Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Screening of Barley Genotypes for Resistance to Pyrenophora teres f. teres under Controlled Inoculation Conditions Cover

Screening of Barley Genotypes for Resistance to Pyrenophora teres f. teres under Controlled Inoculation Conditions

Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Abebe, W. (2021). Barley net blotch disease management: A review. International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, 7(9), 69 − 81. Available at: https://ijoear.com/assets/articles_menuscripts/file/IJOEAR-SEP-2021-20.pdf [Accessed 16 March 2026].
  2. Adhikari, A., Steffenson, B., Smith, M., and Dill‐Macky, R. (2019). Genome‐wide association mapping of seedling net form net blotch resistance in an ethiopian and eritrean barley collection. Crop Science, 59(4), 1625 − 1638. DOI:10.2135/cropsci2019.01.0003.
  3. Afanasenko, O., Hartleb, H., Guseva, N., Minarikova V., and Janosheva M. (1995). A set of differentials to characterize populations of Pyrenophora teres Drechs. for international use. Journal of Phytopathology, 143(8), 501 − 507. DOI:10.1111/J.1439-0434.1995.Tb04562.X .
  4. Afanasenko, O., Mironenko, N., Filatova, O., Kopahnke, D., Krämer, I., and Ordon, F. (2007). Genetics of host-pathogen interactions in the Pyrenophora teres f. teres (net form)–barley (Hordeum vulgare) pathosystem. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 117(3), 267-280. DOI:10.1007/s10658-006-9093-5
  5. Afanasenko, O., Jalli, M., Pinnschmidt, H., Filatova, O., and Platz, G. (2009). Development of an international standard set of barley differential genotypes for Pyrenophora teres f. teres. Plant Pathology, 58(4), 665 − 676. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2009.02062.x.
  6. Akhavan, A., Strelkov, S., Kher, S., Askarian, H., Tucker, J., Legge, W., Tekauz, A., and Turkington, T. (2017). Resistance to Pyrenophora teres f. teres and P. teres f. maculata in canadian barley genotypes. Crop Science, 57(1), 151-160. DOI:10.2135/cropsci2016.05.0385 .
  7. Backes, A., Guerriero, G., Barka, E. A., and Jacquard, C. (2021). Pyrenophora teres: Taxonomy, morphology, interaction with barley, and mode of control. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 614951. DOI:10.3389/fpls.2021.614951.
  8. Bakonyi, J. and Justesen, A. (2007). Genetic relationship of Pyrenophora graminea, P. teres f. maculata and P. teres f. teres assessed by RAPD analysis. Journal of Phytopathology, 155(2), 76 − 83. DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0434.2007.01192.x.
  9. Bouajila, A., Zoghlami, N., Ahmed, M., Baum, M., Ghorbel, A., and Nazari, K. (2011). Comparative virulence of Pyrenophora teres f. teres from Syria and Tunisia and screening for resistance sources in barley: implications for breeding. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 53(5), 489 − 502. DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2011.03127.x.
  10. Clare, S., Wyatt, N., Brueggeman, R.. and Friesen, T. (2019). Research advances in the Pyrenophora teres–barley interaction. Molecular Plant Pathology, 21(2), 272 − 288. DOI: 10.1111/mpp.12896.
  11. Deadman, M. and Cooke, B. (1986). A comparison of detached leaf, greenhouse and field experiments for screening barley cultivars to drechslera-teres. Irish Journal Of Agricultural Research, 25(1), 63 − 70. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25556135 [Accessed 16 Feb. 2026].
  12. Dinglasan, E., Hickey, L., Ziems, L., Fowler, R., Anisimova, A., Baranova, O., Lashina, N., and Afanasenko, O. (2019). Genetic characterization of resistance to Pyrenophora teres f. teres in the international barley differential canadian lake shore. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 326. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00326.
  13. D’Souza, N., Dinh, H., Lawrence, J., Palmiero, E., Muria-Gonzalez, M., Gupta, S., Forrest, K., and Ellwood, S. (2025). Exploiting barley landraces to reintroduce lost genetic diversity: Resistance to net form net blotch. Crop Science, 65(3), e70088. DOI:10.1002/csc2.70088.
  14. El-Mor, I., Fowler, R., Platz, G., Sutherland, M., and Martin, A. (2018). An improved detached-leaf assay for phenotyping net blotch of barley caused by Pyrenophora teres. Plant Disease, 102(4), 760 − 763. DOI:10.1094/pdis-07-17-0980-re.
  15. Ellwood, S., Syme, R., Moffat, C., and Oliver, R. (2012). Evolution of three Pyrenophora cereal pathogens: Recent divergence, speciation and evolution of non-coding DNA. Fungal Genetics and Biology, 49(10), 825 − 829. DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2012.07.003.
  16. Friesen, T., Faris, J., Lai, Z., and Steffenson, B. (2006). Identification and chromosomal location of major genes for resistance to Pyrenophora teres in a doubled-haploid barley population. Genome, 49(7), 855 − 859. DOI:10.1139/g06-024.
  17. Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. and Ryan, P. (2001). PAST: Paleonto-logical statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4, 1 − 9. Available at: http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm [Accessed 5 March 2026].
  18. Hassett, K., Muria‐Gonzalez, M., Martin, A., Karakaya, A., Oğuz, A., Bakonyi, J., Knight, N., Prins, R. and Ellwood, S. (2024). Global spread, genetic differentiation, and selection of barley spot form net blotch isolates. Phytopathology, 114(7), 1542 − 1553. DOI:10.1094/phyto-11-23-0442-r.
  19. Jönsson, R., Bryngelsson, T., Jalli, M., and Gustafsson, M. (1998). Effect of Growth Stage on Resistance to Drechslera teres f. teres in Barley. Journal of Phytopathology, 146(5 − 6), 261 − 265. DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0434.1998. tb04688.x.
  20. Jordan, V. and Allen, E. (1984). Barley net blotch: influence of straw disposal and cultivation methods on inoculum potential, and on incidence and severity of autumn disease. Plant Pathology, 33, 547 – 559. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-3059.1984. tb02879.x.
  21. Jørgensen, J., Bech, C. and Jensen, J. (2000). Reaction of European spring barley varieties to a population of the net blotch fungus. Plant Breeding, 119(1), 43 − 46. DOI:10.1046/j.1439-0523.2000.00455.x.
  22. Mathre, D. (1982). Compendium of Barley Diseases. American Phytopathology Society, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA. 78 p.
  23. Oğuz, A., Rahimi, A. and Karakaya, A. (2019). Seedling response of iranian barley landraces to Pyrenophora teres f. teres and Pyrenophora teres f. maculata. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 25(1), 86 − 92. DOI:10.15832/ankutbd.539006.
  24. Poudel, B., Vaghefi, N., McLean, M., Platz, G., Sutherland, M., and Martin, A. (2019). Genetic structure of a Pyrenophora teres f. teres population over time in an Australian barley field as revealed by Diversity Arrays Technology markers. Plant Pathology, 68(7), 1331 − 1336. DOI:10.1111/ppa.13035.
  25. Robinson, J. and Jalli, M. (1997). Grain yield, net blotch and scald of barley in Finnish official variety trials. Agricultural and Food Science, 6(5 − 6), 399 − 408. DOI:0.23986/afsci.72803.
  26. Rozanova, I., Lashina, N., Mustafin, Z., Gorobets, S., Efimov, V., Afanasenko, O., and Khlestkina, E. (2019). SNPs associated with barley resistance to isolates of Pyrenophora teres f. teres. BMC Genomics, 20(S3), 292. DOI:10.1186/s12864-019-5623-3.
  27. Sharma, H. (1984). Assessment of the reaction of some spring barley cultivars to Pyrenophora teres using whole plants, detached leaves and toxin bioassay. Plant Pathology, 33(3), 371-376. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-3059.1984.tb01332.x.
  28. Tekauz, A. (1985). A numerical scale to classify reactions of barley to Pyrenophora teres. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 7(2), 181-183. DOI: 10.1080/07060668509501499
  29. Tomić, A., Trkulja, V., Matić, S., Trkulja, N., Iličić. R., Scortichini, M., and Milovanović, T. (2024). Net blotch (Pyrenophora teres Drechsler): An increasingly significant threat to barley production. Plant Protection Science, 60, 1 – 30. DOI:10.17221/122/2023-pps.
  30. Tuohy, J., Jalli, M., Cooke, B., and Sullivan, E. (2006). Pathogenic variation in populations of Drechslera teres f. teres and D. teres f. maculata and differences in host cultivar responses. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 116, 177 – 185. DOI:10.1007/s10658-006-9001-z.
  31. Vahamidis, P., Stefopoulou, A., Lagogianni, C., Economou, G., Dercas, N., Kotoulas, V., Kalivas, D., and Tsitsigiannis, D. (2020). Pyrenophora teres and Rhynchosporium secalis establishment in a Mediterranean malt barley field: assessing spatial, temporal and management effects. Agriculture, 10(11), 553. DOI:10.3390/agriculture10110553.
  32. Vatter, T., Maurer, A., Kopahnke, D., Perović, D., Ordon, F. and Pillen, K. (2017). A nested association mapping population identifies multiple small effect QTL conferring resistance against net blotch (Pyrenophora teres f. teres) in wild barley. Plos One, 12(10), e0186803. DOI:10.1371/journal. pone.0186803.
  33. Wallwork, H., Vassos, E., Garrard, T., Butt, M., Abood, E., Sznajder, B., and Mather, D. (2024). Adult-plant resistance to net form net blotch in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.): Durability and genetic control. Plant Breeding, 143(4), 587 – 596. DOI:10.1111/pbr.13191.
  34. Williams, K., Smyl, C., Lichon, A., Wong, K., and Wallwork, H. (2001). Development and use of an assay based on the polymerase chain reaction that differentiates the pathogens causing spot form and net form of net blotch of barley. Australasian Plant Pathology, 30, 37 – 44. DOI:10.1071/AP00063.
  35. Wonneberger, R., Ficke, A. and Lillemo, M. (2017). Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with resistance to net form net blotch in a collection of Nordic barley germplasm. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 130(10), 2025 − 2043. DOI:10.1007/s00122-017-2940-2.
  36. Zia, R., Popper, Z. and Kildea, S. (2025). Barley Disease screening: A multiplex digital droplet PCR approach for the detection of Ramularia collo‐cygni, Rhynchosporium graminicola and Pyrenophora teres. Plant Pathology, 74(6), 1752 − 1762. DOI:10.1111/ppa.14123.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/agri-2026-0002 | Journal eISSN: 1338-4376 | Journal ISSN: 0551-3677
Language: English
Page range: 17 - 30
Submitted on: Mar 31, 2026
Accepted on: Jun 16, 2026
Published on: Sep 5, 2026
Published by: National Agricultural and Food Centre
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:

© 2026 Miriam Nadubinská, Matúš Hrotík, Martina Hudcovicová, Katarína Ondreičková, René Hauptvogel, Pavol Hauptvogel, published by National Agricultural and Food Centre
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.