Abstract
This paper examines how political considerations shape the use of research evidence in policy-making. It stresses that systematic and transparent approaches are essential for presenting complex issues and the best available evidence to ministers. By categorising policymakers and proposing that researchers have ethical responsibilities to engage beyond academia, the paper emphasises the need for the ‘three Cs’, citizens, context and clarity, as essential criteria for communicating evidence to decision makers. Using real-world examples, it shows why research, even where findings are uncertain or inconclusive, is crucial for decision-making. The paper calls for evidence to be transparent, accessible and relevant, so that ministers can make more equitable and effective policy decisions, strengthening the connection between research and policy systems, and improving public outcomes.
© 2026 Denis Naughten, published by The Institute of Public Administration of Ireland
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.