References
- Alhossini, M. A., Ntim, C. G. & Zalata, A. M. (2021). Corporate board committees and corporate outcomes: An international systematic literature review and agenda for future research. International Journal of Accounting, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1094406021500013
- Baron, R. J. (2015). Professional self-regulation in a changing world: Old problems need new approaches. JAMA – Journal of the American Medical Association, 313(18), 1807–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.4060
- Baum, H. (2016). The rise of the independent director: A historical and comparative perspective. Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law Research Paper 16/20.
- Becker, K. & Bish, A. (2021). A framework for understanding the role of unlearning in onboarding. Human Resource Management Review, 31(1), 100730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100730
- Benton, D. C. et al. (2019). Acting in the public interest: Learnings and commentary on the occupational licensure literature. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 10(2), S1–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2155-8256(19)30120-6
- Benton, D. C., Catizone, C. A. & Chaudhry, H. J. (2017). The changing dynamics of professional regulation: A perspective from medicine, nursing and pharmacy. Journal of Medical Regulation, 103(4), 32–5. https://doi.org/10.30770/2572-1852-103.4.32
- Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Bridges, S. J. (2018). Professional identity development: Learning and journeying together. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 14(3), 290–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.03.054
- Brown, N. (2021). Scope and continuum of participatory research. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 45(2), 200–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2021.1902980
- Byrne, C. (2016). Ready or not? Statutory registration, regulation and continuing professional development for social care workers in Ireland. Administration, 64(2), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1515/admin-2016-0014
- Caldwell, C. & Peters, R. (2018). New employee onboarding – psychological contracts and ethical perspectives. Journal of Management Development, 37(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-10-2016-0202
- Canning, M. & O’Dwyer, B. (2013). The dynamics of a regulatory space realignment: Strategic responses in a local context. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(3), 169–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2013.01.002
- Chamberlain, J. M. (2016). Risk-based regulation and reforms to Fitness to Practise Tribunals in the United Kingdom: Serving the public interest? Risk & Society, 18(5.6), 318–34.
- Coghlan, D. (2019). Doing action research in your organisation. 5th ed. Sage Publications Ltd.
- Conroy, S. A., Becker, W. J. & Menges, J. I. (2017). The meaning of my feelings depends on who I am: Work-related identifications shape emotion effects in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 60(3), 1071–93. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.1040
- Corbin Dwyer, S. & Buckle, J. L. (2018). Reflection/Commentary on a past article: ‘The space between: On being an insider-outsider in qualitative research’. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918788176
- Crucke, S. & Knockaert, M. (2016). When stakeholder representation leads to faultlines: A study of board service performance in social enterprises. Journal of Management Studies, 53(5), 768–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12197
- Central Statistics Office. (2017). Census of population 2016 – Profile 3: An age profile of Ireland.
- Central Statistics Office. (2023). Press statement census of population 2022 – Summary results.
- Darwin Holmes, A. G. (2020). Researcher positionality – A consideration of its influence and place in qualitative research – A new researcher guide. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i4.3232
- Department of Further and Higher Education Research Innovation and Science. (2022). Minister Harris welcomes publication of OECD report on third level education [Press release]. www.gov.ie/en/department-of-further-and-higher-education-research-innovation-and-science/press-releases/minister-harris-welcomes-publication-of-oecd-report-on-third-level-education
- Department of Public Expenditure and Reform. (2016). Code of practice for the governance of state bodies. https://govacc.per.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/Code-of-Practice-for-the-Governance-of-State-Bodies.pdf
- Department of Public Expenditure and Reform. (2022). Gender balance diversity on state boards: The next steps. www.gov.ie/en/publication/1c236-gender-balance-diversity-on-state-boards-the-next-steps/
- Elms, N. & Nicholson, G. (2020). How director identification shapes accountability and scope of contribution. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 33(8), 1815–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2019-4358
- Fantham, P. et al. (2021). Professionalizing regulatory practice within the public service: Lessons from the New Zealand G-REG Initiative. In H. Sullivan, H. Dickinson & H. Henderson (Eds), The Palgrave handbook of the public servant. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Ferreira, D. (2015). Board diversity: Should we trust research to inform policy? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(2), 108–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12092
- Fletcher, A. (2019). An invited outsider or an enriched insider? Challenging contextual knowledge as a critical friend researcher. Educational Researchers and the Regional University: Agents of Regional-Global Transformations, 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6378-8_5
- Gilman, D. J. & Fairma, J. (2015). Antitrust and the future of nursing: Federal competition policy and the scope of practice. Health Matrix: The Journal of Law- Medicine, 24(1). https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/healthmatrix/vol24/iss1/8
- Gremillion, H., Tolich, M. & Bathurst, R. (2015). Lay members of New Zealand research ethics committees: Who and what do they represent? Research Ethics, 11(2), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016115581723
- Han, I. (2017). Conceptualisation of English teachers’ professional identity and comprehension of its dynamics. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(5), 549–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1206525
- Harris, L. et al. (2020). Reclaiming the social in socialization: A practice-based understanding of newcomer adjustment. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 31(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21384
- Horan, A. & Mulreany, M. (2021). Corporate governance in the public sector: Reflections on experience in Ireland. Administration, 68(4), 121–44. https://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2020-0027
- International Council of Nurses (ICN). (2014). Regulatory board governance toolkit ICN Regulation Series, 1–65. www.icn.ch/sites/default/files/inline-files/2014_Regulatory_Board_Governance_Toolkit.pdf
- Irish Nurses Organisation. (2008). Submission to Department of Health and Children Draft Heads of the Proposed Nurses & Midwives Bill.
- Institute of Directors Ireland & Mazars. (2017). Governance for directors on state boards. www.iodireland.ie/resources-media/research-publications/director-handbooks/governance-directors-state-boards
- Issa, A. & Fang, H. X. (2019). The impact of board gender diversity on corporate social responsibility in the Arab Gulf states. Gender in Management, 34(7), 577–605. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-07-2018-0087
- Johnson, D. A. et al. (2019). The role and value of public members in health care regulatory governance. Academic Medicine, 94(2), 182–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002481
- Knight, L. et al. (2020). Trust, professionalism and regulation: A critical exploration. University College London Medical School, Research Department of Medical Education. www.ucl.ac.uk/medical-sciences/sites/medical_sciences/files/final-nuffield-executive-summary.pdf
- Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning; legitimate peripheral participation. 20th ed. Cambridge University Press.
- Leslie, K. et al. (2021). Regulating health professional scopes of practice: comparing institutional arrangements and approaches in the US, Canada, Australia and the UK. Human Resources for Health, 19(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-020-00550-3
- Levitt, H. M. et al. (2021). The methodological integrity of critical qualitative research: Principles to support design and research review. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 68(3), 357–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000523
- McNiff, J. (2017). Action research: All you need to know. Sage Publications Ltd.
- Murphy, D., Gilligan, K. & Watson, D. (2021). From the community handywomen to frontline heroes: Charting a century of Irish nursing and midwifery regulation. Administration, 69(3), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2021-0019
- Nursing and Midwifery Board of Ireland. (2022). State of the Register 2022.
- Nunes, R., Rego, G. & Brandão, C. (2009). Healthcare regulation as a tool for public accountability. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 12(3), 257–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-008-9177-4
- Oehmichen, J. et al. (2017). Boards of directors and organizational ambidexterity in knowledge-intensive firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(2), 283–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1244904
- Oireachtas na hÉireann. (2011). Nurses and Midwives Act. Houses of the Oireachtas. www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2011/act/41/enacted/en/print.html
- O’Regan, P. & Killian, S. (2014). ‘Professionals who understand’: Expertise, public interest and societal risk governance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(8), 615–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.07.004
- Pickard, S. & Smith, K. (2001). A ‘Third Way’ for lay involvement: What evidence so far? Health Expectations, 4(3), 170–9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00131.x
- Price, T. et al. (2020). Reviving clinical governance? A qualitative study of the impact of professional regulatory reform on clinical governance in healthcare organisations in England. Health Policy, 124(4), 446–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.01.004
- Richardson, E. et al. (2019). User involvement in regulation: A qualitative study of service user involvement in Care Quality Commission inspections of health and social care providers in England. Health Expectations, 22(June 2018), 245–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12849
- Saks, A. M. & Gruman, J. A. (2018). Socialization resources theory and newcomers’ work engagement: A new pathway to newcomer socialization. Career Development International, 23(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-12-2016-0214
- Santos, D. (2016). Re-signifying participatory action research (PAR) in higher education: What does ‘P’ stand for in PAR? Educational Action Research, 24(4), 635–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1103658
- Sendall, M. C. et al. (2018). Participatory action research, mixed methods, and research teams: Learning from philosophically juxtaposed methodologies for optimal research outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0636-1
- Skinner, B., Leavey, G. & Rothi, D. (2021). Managerialism and teacher professional identity: impact on well-being among teachers in the UK. Educational Review, 73(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1556205
- Stievano, A. et al. (2019). Shaping nursing profession regulation through history – A systematic review. International Nursing Review, 66(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12449
- Trainor, C. J. (2020). The business case for boardroom heterogeneity. The Journal of Gender, Race and Justice, 23(2), 451–94. https://jgrj.law.uiowa.edu/online-edition/volume-23/the-business-case-forboardroom-heterogeneity
- Trede, F., Macklin, R. & Bridges, D. (2012). Professional identity development: A review of the higher education literature. Studies in Higher Education, 37(3), 365–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.521237
- Veltrop, D. B. et al. (2021). Too unsafe to monitor? How board-CEO cognitive conflict and chair leadership shape outside director monitoring. Academy of Management Journal, 64(1), 207–34. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2017.1256
- Watt, R. & Perkins, M. (2020). Leading public service reform: Some reflections. Administration, 68(4), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2020-0024
- Weck, M. K. et al. (2022). Why and when female directors are less engaged in their board duties: An interface perspective. Long Range Planning, 55(3), 102123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2021.102123
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge University Press. Wenghofer, E. F. (2015). Research in medical regulation: An active demonstration of accountability. Journal of Medical Regulation, 101(3), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.30770/2572-1852-101.3.13
- Wertsch, J. (2008). From social interaction to higher psychological processes: A clarification and application of Vygotsky’s theory. Human Development, 51(1),66–79. https://doi.org/10.1159/000112532
- Withers, M. C. & Hillman, A. J. (2008). Director identities and the role of the board in organizational turnaround. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2008(1) [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2008.33640675