‘Best advice available’ – Challenge and change in developing an optimal policy advisory system in Ireland

Connaughton, Bernadette; Devane, Cian

doi:10.2478/admin-2023-0016

Abstract

The concept of a policy advisory system (PAS) is devised to study the diverse range of actors involved in the policy formulation process from a system level. An optimal PAS should be adaptable, autonomous and transparent, and should deliver substantive and timely advice. This article discusses factors influencing developments in Ireland’s PAS, including the broader trends of politicisation and externalisation. The findings are informed by interviews and a survey circulated to Irish civil servants who perform policy worker tasks and are engaged in providing advice to ministers. The research finds that new structural and institutional arrangements introduced to Ireland’s PAS have created a greater capacity for evidence-based advice in the internal PAS and a more contested space for policy advice. It also highlights that this has not fundamentally disturbed embedded characteristics of the Irish policymaking environment. Political demand pressures from ministers (both personal and electoral) can drive elements of politicisation within the civil service whereby policy advice is weighted or discarded based on ministerial preferences.

References

Boin, A., Brock, K., Craft, J., Halligan, J., ‘t Hart, P., Roy, J., ... & Turnbull, L. (2020). Beyond Covid 19: Five commentaries on expert knowledge, executive action, and accountability in governance and public administration. Canadian Public Administration, 63(3), 339–68.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Boyle, R., & O’Riordan, J. (2021). Policy analysis in the civil service. In J. Hogan & M. Murphy (Eds), Policy analysis in Ireland (pp. 107–22). Bristol University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Comptroller and Auditor General. (2007). Special report 56 – Improving performance-public service case studies. www.audit.gov.ie
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Connaughton B. (2010). Glorified gofers, policy experts or good generalists: A classification of the roles of the Irish ministerial adviser. Irish Political Studies, 25(3), 347–69.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Connaughton, B. (2012). Ministers and their departments: Inside the ‘black box’ of the public policy process. In E. O’Malley & M. MacCarthaigh (Eds), Governing Ireland: From cabinet government to delegated governance (pp. 61–87). Institute of Public Administration.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Connaughton, B. (2015). Developing a hybrid identity? The Europeanisation of public servants at the continent’s far west. In F. Sager & P. Overeem (Eds), The European public servant a shared administrative identity (pp. 199–217). ECPR Press/Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Connaughton, B. (2017). Political–administrative relations: The role of political advisers. Administration, 65(2), 165–82.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Connaughton, B. (2022). Ireland’s core executive at one hundred years of self-government: Navigating coalition, crisis and complexity. In K. Kolltveit & R. Shaw (Eds), Core executives in a comparative perspective: Governing in complex times (pp. 123–41). Palgrave Macmillan.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Connaughton, B., Rice, C., & Shaw, R. (2023). The Westminster tradition. In R. Shaw (Ed.), Handbook on ministerial and political advisers (pp. 296–317). Edward Elgar.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Craft, J., & Halligan, J. (2017). Assessing 30 years of Westminster policy advisory system experience. Policy Sciences, 50(1), 47–62.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Craft, J. & Howlett, M. (2012). Policy formulation, governance shifts and policy influence: Location and content in policy advisory systems. Journal of Public Policy, 32(2), 79–98.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Craft, J., & Howlett, M. (2013). The dual dynamics of policy advisory systems: The impact of externalisation and politicisation on policy advice. Policy and Society, 32(3), 187–97.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Craft, J., & Wilder, M. (2017). Catching a second wave: Context and compatibility in advisory system dynamics. Policy Studies Journal, 45(1), 1–25.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Diamond, P. (2020). Polycentric governance and policy advice: Lessons from Whitehall policy advisory systems. Policy and Politics, 48(4), 563–81.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Donadelli, F. & Gregory, R. (2022). Speaking truth to power and power to truth: Reflections from the pandemic. Public Organisation Review, 22, 327–44.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Eichbaum, C., & Shaw, R. (2008). Revisiting politicisation: Political advisers and public servants in Westminster systems. Governance, 21(3), 337–63.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Galanti, M., & Lippi, L. (2022). Government research institutes in the Italian policy advisory system. International Review of Administrative Sciences. Advance online publication.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gornitzka, A., & Sverdrup, U. (2010). Enlightened decision making? The role of scientists in EU governance. Politique Européenne, 32, 125–49. Government of Ireland. (2020). Our shared future. Department of the Taoiseach.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Government of Ireland. (2021). Civil service renewal 2030 strategy: ‘Building on our strengths’. Department of Public Expenditure and Reform.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Halligan, J. (1995). Policy advice and the public service. In B. G. Peters & D. Savoie (Eds), Governance in a changing environment (pp. 138–72). McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hogan, J., & Murphy, M. (2021). Contextualising policy analysis in Ireland. In J. Hogan & M. Murphy (Eds), Policy analysis in Ireland (pp. 3–15). Bristol University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Honohan, P. (2010). The Irish banking crisis regulatory and financial stability policy 2003–2008: A report to the Minister for Finance by the Governor of the central bank. www.socialjustice.ie
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Houses of the Oireachtas. (2021). Report on the processes and procedures applying to the appointment of senior executives in the public service. Joint Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure, Reform and Taoiseach.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Howlett, M. (2011). Public managers as the missing variable in policy studies: An empirical investigation using Canadian data. Review of Policy Research, 28(3), 247–63.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Howlett, M. (2019). Comparing policy advisory systems beyond the OECD: Models, dynamics and the second-generation research agenda. Policy Studies, 40(3–4), 241–59.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Howlett, M., & Migone, A. (2014). Duplicative or complementary? The relationship between policy consulting and internal policy analysis in Canadian government. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 113–34.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hustedt, T. (2019). Studying policy advisory systems: Beyond the Westminster-bias? Policy Studies, 40(3–4), 260–9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hustedt, T. (2022). Ministerial advisory systems and politics. In A. Ladner & F. Sager, Handbook on the politics of public administration (pp. 93–101). Edward Elgar.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hustedt, T., & Veit, S. (2017). Policy advisory systems: Change dynamics and sources of variation. Policy Sciences, 50, 41–6.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Irish Government Economic and Evaluation Service. (2020). IGEES medium term strategy 2020–2022. Irish Government Economic and Evaluation Service.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lee, J. (1989). Ireland 1912–1985: Politics and society. Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
LSE GV314 Group. (2018). Politicians in white coats? Scientific advisory committees and policy in Britain. Public Policy and Administration, 33(4), 428–46.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MacCarthaigh, M. (2014). Agency termination in Ireland: Culls and bonfires, or life after death? Public Administration, 92(4), 1017–37.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MacCarthaigh, M. (2017). Public sector reform in Ireland: Countering crisis. Palgrave MacMillan.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MacCarthaigh, M. (2021). The changing policy analysis capacity of the Irish state. In J. Hogan & M. Murphy (Eds), Policy analysis in Ireland (pp. 47–62). Bristol University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MacCormaic, A. (2016). Modes of politicisation in the Irish civil service: Ministers and the politico–administrative relationship in Ireland. Palgrave Macmillan.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Manwaring, R. (2018). Understanding impact in policy advisory systems: The Australian case of the thinker in residence. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(11), 868–79.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Manwaring, R. (2019). Political demand and policy advice: A framework for analysis. Policy Studies, 40(3–4), 270–86.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Marciano, R. (2023). More than just experts for hire: A conceptualisation of the roles of consultants in public policy formulation. Policy Studies Journal. Advance online publication.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Marciano, R., & Craft, J. (2023). Theorising policy advisory system management: Approaches and practice. Journal of Public Policy. Advance online publication.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McCarthy, A. (2014). Leading during uncertainty and economic turbulence: An investigation of leadership strengths and development needs in the senior Irish public sector. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(1), 54–73.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Murphy, G. (2017). Lobbying regulation in Ireland: Fool’s errand or finest hour? Administration, 65(2), 127–44.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
National Economic and Social Council. (2022). The Covid-19 pandemic: Lessons for Irish public policy. Council Report no. 158. National Economic and Social Development Office.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nistotskaya, M., Dahlberg, S., Axelsson, S., & Mert Dali, C. (2021). The quality of government expert survey 2020 (wave III). QoG, University of Gothenburg.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
OECD. (2008). OECD public management reviews – Ireland: Towards an integrated public service. OECD.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
OECD. (2017). Policy advisory systems. OECD.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
OECD. (2023). Strengthening policy development in the public sector in Ireland. OECD.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
O’Toole, J., & Dooney, S. (2009). Irish government today. Gill and Macmillan. Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2004). Politicisation of the civil service in comparative perspective: The quest for control. Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rafter, K. (2015). Holding to account: Some reflections on civil service reform. Administration, 63(1), 27–37.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ruane, F. (2021). Introducing evidence into policy making in Ireland. In J. Hogan & M. Murphy (Eds), Policy analysis in Ireland (pp. 63–75). Policy Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ruane, F., & Lunn, P. (2013). Increasing the contribution of evidence to policy. In P. Lunn & F. Ruane (Eds), Using evidence to inform policy (pp. 266–74). Gill and Macmillan.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Russell, M., & Serban, R. (2021). The muddle of the ‘Westminster model’: A concept stretched beyond repair. Government and Opposition, 56(4), 744–64.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Seymour-Ure, C. (1987). Institutionalisation and informality in advisory systems. In W. Plowden (Ed.), Advising the rulers. Blackwell.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shaw, R. (2023). For better or for worse? Into the future. In R. Shaw (Ed.), Handbook on ministerial and political advisers (pp. 406–18). Edward Elgar.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shaw, R., & Eichbaum, C. (2018). Conclusion: New directions in studying ministerial advisers. In R. Shaw & C. Eichbaum (Eds), Ministers, minders, and mandarins: An international study of relationships at the executive summit of parliamentary democracies (pp. 198–217). Edward Elgar.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Staroňová, K., & Rybář, M. (2023). Comparing ministerial advisers across politicization settings: Still hiding in the shadows? Governance, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12760
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Travers J. (2005). Interim report on the report on certain issues of management and administration in the Department of Health and Children associated with the practice of charges for persons in long stay health care in health board institutions and related matters. Oireachtas Joint Committee on Health and Children.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Top Level Appointments Committee. (2021). The ninth report to the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform from the Top Level Appointments Committee (TLAC): 2020 developments and trends. www.publicjobs.ie
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Top Level Appointments Committee. (2022). The tenth report to the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform from the Top Level Appointments Committee (TLAC): 2021 developments and trends. www.publicjobs.ie
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
van den Berg, C. (2017). Dynamics in the Dutch policy advisory system: Externalisation, politicisation and the legacy of pillarisation. Policy Sciences, 50(1), 63–84.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Veit, S., Hustedt, T., & Bach, T. (2017). Dynamics of change in internal policy advisory systems: The hybridization of advisory capacities in Germany. Policy Sciences, 50, 85–103.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Veselý, A. (2013). Externalization of policy advice: Theory, methodology and evidence. Policy and Society, 32(3), 199–209.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Veselý, A. (2017). Policy advice as policy work: A conceptual framework for multi-level analysis. Policy Sciences, 50, 139–54.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Weible, C. M., Nohrstedt, D., & Cairney, P. (2020) Covid-19 and the policy sciences: Initial reactions and perspectives. Policy Sciences, 53, 225–41.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wildavksy, A. (1979). Speaking truth to power: The art and craft of policy analysis. Little Brown.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wright, R. (2010). Strengthening the capacity of the Department of Finance – Report of the Independent Review Panel. Department of Finance.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

‘Best advice available’ – Challenge and change in developing an optimal policy advisory system in Ireland

Abstract

Paradigm

My account