Have a personal or library account? Click to login
‘Double activation’: Workfare meets marketisation Cover

‘Double activation’: Workfare meets marketisation

By: Michael McGann  
Open Access
|May 2021

References

  1. Adkins, L. (2017). Disobedient workers, the law and the making of unemployment markets. Sociology, 51 (2), 290–305.10.1177/0038038515598276
  2. Bartlett, W. (1991). Quasi-markets and contracts: A markets and hierarchies perspective on NHS reform. Public Money and Management, 11 (3), 53–61.10.1080/09540969109387669
  3. Bennett, H. (2017). Re-examining British welfare-to-work contracting using a transaction cost perspective. Journal of Social Policy, 46 (1), 129–48.10.1017/S0047279416000337
  4. Boland, T., & Griffin, R. (2015). The death of unemployment and the birth of job-seeking in welfare policy: Governing a liminal experience 1. Irish Journal of Sociology, 23 (2), 29–48.10.7227/IJS.23.2.3
  5. Boland, T., & Griffin, R. (2018). The purgatorial ethic and the spirit of welfare. Journal of Classical Sociology, 18 (2), 87–103.10.1177/1468795X17722079
  6. Bonoli, G. (2010). The political economy of active labor-market policy. Politics & Society, 38 (4), 435–57.10.1177/0032329210381235
  7. Bredgaard, T., & Larsen, F. (2007). Implementing public employment policy: What happens when non-public agencies take over? International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27 (7/8), 287–300.10.1108/01443330710773863
  8. Brodkin, E. Z. (2011). Policy work: Street-level organisations under new managerialism. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21 (supplement), i253–i277.10.1093/jopart/muq093
  9. Brodkin, E. Z. (2013a). Street-level organisations and the welfare state. In E. Z. Brodkin & G. Marston (Eds), Work and the welfare state: Street-level organisations and workfare politics (pp. 17–36). Copenhagen: Djof.10.4324/9781315694474-3
  10. Brodkin, E. Z. (2013b). Work and the welfare state. In E. Z. Brodkin & G. Marston (Eds), Work and the welfare state: Street-level organisations and workfare politics (pp. 3–16). Copenhagen: Djof.
  11. Carter, E., & Whitworth, A. (2015). Creaming and parking in quasi-marketised welfare-to-work schemes: Designed out of or designed into the UK Work Programme? Journal of Social Policy, 44 (2), 277–96.10.1017/S0047279414000841
  12. Comptroller and Auditor General. (2018). Report on the accounts of the public services 2017. Dublin: Government of Ireland.
  13. Considine, M., Lewis, J. M., & O’Sullivan, S. (2011). Quasi-markets and service delivery flexibility following a decade of employment assistance reform in Australia. Journal of Social Policy, 40 (4), 811–33.10.1017/S0047279411000213
  14. Considine, M., Lewis, J. M., O’Sullivan, S., & Sol, E. (2015). Getting welfare to work: Street-level governance in Australia, the UK, and the Netherlands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198743705.001.0001
  15. Considine, M., O’Sullivan, S., McGann, M., & Nguyen, P. (2020). Contracting personalization by results: Comparing marketization reforms in the UK and Australia. Public Administration, 98 (4), 873–90.10.1111/padm.12662
  16. Cousins, M. (2019). Welfare conditionality in the Republic of Ireland after the Great Recession. Journal of Social Security Law, 26 (1), 30–41.
  17. Department of Employment Affairs and Social Protection. (2019). Evaluation of JobPath outcomes for Q1 2016 participants. Dublin: Department of Employment Affairs and Social Protection.
  18. Department of Public Expenditure and Reform. (2011). Public service reform plan. Dublin: Department of Public Expenditure and Reform.
  19. Department of Public Expenditure and Reform. (2014). Public sector reform plan 2014–2016. Dublin: Department of Public Expenditure and Reform.
  20. Department of Social Protection. (2013). Request for tender by the Department of Social Protection for the provision of employment services. Dublin: Department of Social Protection.
  21. Dukelow, F., & Considine, M. (2014). Between retrenchment and recalibration: The impact of austerity on the Irish social protection system. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 41 (1), 55.
  22. Fuertes, V., & Lindsay, C. (2016). Personalisation and street-level practice in activation: The case of the UK’s Work Programme. Public Administration, 94 (2), 526–41.10.1111/padm.12234
  23. Government of Ireland. (2011). Government for national recovery 2011–16. Dublin: Government of Ireland.
  24. Greer, I. (2016). Welfare reform, precarity and the re-commodification of labour. Work, Employment and Society, 31 (1), 162–73.10.1177/0950017015572578
  25. Greer, I., Breidahl, K. N., Knuth, M., & Larsen, F. (2017). The marketization of employment services: The dilemmas of Europe’s work-first welfare states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  26. Grover, C. (2009). Privatizing employment services in Britain. Critical Social Policy, 29 (3), 487–509.10.1177/0261018309105181
  27. Hill, J. (2013). The marketization of employment services and the British Work Programme. Competition and Change, 17 (2), 197–207.10.1179/1024529413Z.00000000033
  28. Holden, C. (2003). Decommodification and the workfare state. Political Studies Review, 1, 303–16.10.1111/1478-9299.t01-2-00001
  29. Indecon. (2018). Indecon review of Local Employment Services. Dublin: Indecon International Economic Consultants.
  30. Kallio, J., Blomberg, H., & Kroll, C. (2013). Social workers’ attitudes towards the unemployed in Nordic countries. International Journal of Social Welfare, 22 (1), 219–29.10.1111/j.1468-2397.2012.00891.x
  31. Kelly, E., McGuinness, S., Redmond, P., Savage, M., & Walsh, J. R. (2019). An initial evaluation of the effectiveness of Intreo activation reforms. Dublin: Economic and Social Research Institute.10.26504/rs81
  32. Köppe, S., & MacCarthaigh, M. (2019). Public service integration in hard times: Merging unemployment benefit and labour market activation measures. Administration, 67 (2), 137–60.10.2478/admin-2019-0017
  33. Labour Market Advisory Council. (2020). Preparing for economic recovery. Dublin: Labour Market Advisory Council.
  34. Lavelle, O., & Callaghan, N. (2018). Public Employment Services: Mapping activation. Dublin: Department of Public Expenditure and Reform.
  35. Le Grand, J. (1997). Knights, knaves or pawns? Human behaviour and social policy. Journal of Social Policy, 26 (2), 149–69.10.1017/S0047279497004984
  36. Le Grand, J. (2010). Knights and knaves return: Public service motivation and the delivery of public services. International Public Management Journal, 13 (1), 56–71.10.1080/10967490903547290
  37. Le Grand, J., & Bartlett, W. (1993a). Introduction. In J. Le Grand & W. Bartlett (Eds), Quasi-markets and social policy (pp. 1–12). London: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-22873-7_1
  38. Le Grand, J., & Bartlett, W. (1993b). Quasi-markets and social policy: The way forward? In J. Le Grand & W. Bartlett (Eds), Quasi-markets and social policy (pp. 202–20). London: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-22873-7_9
  39. Lowe, S. (2015). JobPath: The proposed introduction of an employment programme in the Republic of Ireland. The Public Sphere, 3 (2), 113–30.
  40. MacCarthaigh, M. (2017). Reforming the Irish public service: A multiple streams perspective. Administration, 65 (2), 145–64.10.1515/admin-2017-0019
  41. MacCarthaigh, M., & Hardiman, N. (2020). Exploiting conditionality: EU and international actors and post-NPM reform in Ireland. Public Policy and Administration, 35 (2), 179–200.10.1177/0952076718796548
  42. Martin, J. P. (2015). Activation and active labour market policies in OECD countries: Stylised facts and evidence on their effectiveness. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 4 (4).10.1186/s40173-015-0032-y
  43. McCarthy, C., McNally, D., McLaughlin, P., O’Connell, M., Slattery, W., & Walsh, M. (2009). Report of the Special Group on Public Service Numbers and Expenditure Programmes. Dublin: Department of Finance.
  44. McDonald, C., & Marston, G. (2008). Motivating the unemployed? Attitudes at the front line. Australian Social Work, 61 (4), 315–26.10.1080/03124070802428167
  45. Mead, L. (1986). Beyond entitlement: The social obligations of citizenship. New York: The Free Press.
  46. Morris, L. (2020). Activating the welfare subject: The problem of agency. Sociology, 54 (2), 275–91.10.1177/0038038519867635
  47. Murphy, M. P., & Hearne, R. (2019). Implementing marketisation: Comparing Irish activation and social housing. Irish Political Studies, 34 (3), 444–63.10.1080/07907184.2019.1583215
  48. Murphy, M. P., Irwin, A., & Maher, M. (2020). Winners and losers? The social marketisation of civil society. Galway: Maynooth University Social Sciences Institute and Community Work Ireland.
  49. Murray, C. (1984). Losing ground. Philadelphia: Basic Books.
  50. Newman, J. (2007). The ‘double dynamics’ of activation: Institutions, citizens and the remaking of welfare governance. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27 (9/10), 364–75.10.1108/01443330710822066
  51. Peck, J. (2001). Workfare states. New York: The Guildford Press.
  52. Rogers, S. (2014, April 30). Fears over companies outsourcing JobPath. Irish Examiner. Retrieved from https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-20266960.html [23 March 2021].
  53. Shutes, I., & Taylor, R. (2014). Conditionality and the financing of employment services: Implications for the social divisions of work and welfare. Social Policy and Administration, 48 (2), 204–20.10.1111/spol.12057
  54. Soss, J., Fording, R., & Schram, S. (2011). Disciplining the poor: Neoliberal paternalism and the persistent power of race. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226768786.001.0001
  55. Soss, J., Fording, R., & Schram, S. (2013). Performance management as a disciplinary regime: Street-level organizations in a neoliberal era of poverty governance. In E. Brodkin & G. Marston (Eds), Work and the welfare state: Street-level organisations and workfare politics (pp. 125–42). Copenhagen: Djof.
  56. Struyven, L., & Steurs, G. (2005). Design and redesign of a quasi-market for the reintegration of jobseekers: Empirical evidence from Australia and the Netherlands. Journal of European Social Policy, 15 (3), 211–29.10.1177/0958928705054083
  57. van Berkel, R. (2013). Triple activation: Introducing welfare-to-work into Dutch social assistance. In E. Brodkin & G. Marston (Eds), Work and the welfare state: Street-level organisations and workfare politics (pp. 87–102). Copenhagen: Djof.
  58. van Berkel, R. (2017). State of the art in frontline studies of welfare-to-work: A literature review. In R. van Berkel, D. Caswell, P. Kupka, & F. Larsen (Eds), Frontline delivery of welfare-to-work policies in Europe: Activating the unemployed (pp. 12–35). London: Routledge.
  59. van Berkel, R., & Knies, E. (2016). Performance management, caseloads and the frontline provision of social services. Social Policy and Administration, 50 (1), 59–78.10.1111/spol.12150
  60. van Berkel, R., & van Der Aa, P. (2005). The marketization of activation services: A modern panacea? Some lessons from the Dutch experience. Journal of European Social Policy, 15 (4), 329–43.10.1177/0958928705057264
  61. Whelan, J. (2021). We have our dignity, yeah? Scrutiny under suspicion: Experiences of welfare conditionality in the Irish social protection system. Social Policy and Administration, 55 (1), 34–50.10.1111/spol.12610
  62. Wiggan, J. (2015a). Varieties of marketisation in the UK: Examining divergence in activation markets between Great Britain and Northern Ireland 2008–2014. Policy Studies, 36 (2), 115–132.10.1080/01442872.2014.996934
  63. Wiggan, J. (2015b). What variety of employment service quasi-market? Ireland’s JobPath as a private power market. Social Policy Review, 27, 151–65.10.2307/j.ctt1t894dv.13
  64. Wright, S. (2012). Welfare-to-work, agency and personal responsibility. Journal of Social Policy, 42 (2), 309–28.10.1017/S0047279411001000
  65. Zacka, B. (2017). When the state meets the street: Public service and moral agency. Cambridge MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674981423
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2021-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2449-9471 | Journal ISSN: 0001-8325
Language: English
Page range: 19 - 42
Published on: May 12, 2021
Published by: The Institute of Public Administration of Ireland
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Michael McGann, published by The Institute of Public Administration of Ireland
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.