Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The role of the ‘centre’ in public service reform Cover

The role of the ‘centre’ in public service reform

Open Access
|Dec 2020

References

  1. Agranoff, R. (2006). Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review, 66, 56–65.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00666.x
  2. Bouckaert, G., Peters, B. G., & Verhoest, K. (2010). The coordination of public sector organizations: Shifting patterns of public management. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230275256
  3. Bowler, S., Bräuninger, T., Debus, M., & Indridason, I. H. (2016). Let’s just agree to disagree: Dispute resolution mechanisms in coalition agreements. Journal of Politics, 78 (4), 1264–78.10.1086/686805
  4. Boyle, R. (2004). The role of the centre in promoting civil service modernisation [CPMR discussion paper no. 27]. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
  5. Boyle, R. (2016). Public service reform. In W. K. Roche, P. J. O’Connell & A. Prothero (Eds), Austerity and recovery in Ireland: Europe’s poster child and the great recession (pp. 214–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Boyle, R., & Joyce, L. (1988). Making change work: Student of organisational change in Irish civil service. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
  7. Boyle, R., & Lemaire, D. (Eds) (1999). Building effective evaluation capacity: Lessons from practice. London: Transaction Publishers.
  8. Boyle, R., & MacCarthaigh, M. (2011). Fit for purpose? Challenges for Irish public administration and priorities for public service reform [State of the public service series no. 4]. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
  9. Burch, M., & Holliday, I. (2004). The Blair government and the core executive. Government and Opposition, 39 (1), 1–21. doi:10.1111/j.0017-257x.2004.00029.x10.1111/j.0017-257x.2004.00029.x
  10. Corbett, J., Veenendaal, W., & Connell, J. (in press). The core executive and small states: Is coordination the primary challenge? Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.1268210.1111/padm.12682
  11. Department of Public Expenditure and Reform. (2017). Our public service 2020. Dublin: Department of Public Expenditure and Reform.
  12. Dunleavy, P., & Rhodes, R. (1990). Core executive studies in Britain. Public Administration, 68 (1), 3–28.10.1111/j.1467-9299.1990.tb00744.x
  13. Elgie, R. (2011). Core executive studies two decades on. Public Administration, 89 (1), 64–77.10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01899.x
  14. Government of Ireland. (2017). Civil service employee engagement survey. Dublin: Department of Public Expenditure and Reform.
  15. Hardiman, N. (2006) Politics and social partnership: Flexible network governance. Economic and Social Review, 37 (3), 347–74.
  16. Hardiman, N., & MacCarthaigh, M. (2011). The unpolitics of new public management in Ireland. In J. M. Eymeri-Douzans & J. Pierre (Eds), Administrative reforms and democratic governance (pp. 55–67). London: Routledge.
  17. Hardiman, N., Regan, A., & Shayne, M. (2010) The core executive: The Department of the Taoiseach and the challenge of policy coordination. In E. O’Malley & M. MacCarthaigh (Eds), Governing Ireland: From cabinet governance to delegated governance (pp. 106–27). Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
  18. Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69 (1), 3–19.10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
  19. Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (Eds) (1997). Managing complex networks. London: Sage.
  20. Laffan, B., & O’Mahoney, J. (2008). Ireland and the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  21. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  22. MacCarthaigh, M. (2017). Public sector reform in Ireland: Countering crisis. Basingstoke: Palgrave.10.1007/978-3-319-57460-8
  23. MacCarthaigh, M., & Hardiman, N. (2020). Exploiting conditionality: EU and international actors and post-NPM reform in Ireland. Public Policy and Administration, 35 (2), 179–200. doi:10.1177/095207671879654810.1177/0952076718796548
  24. OECD. (2008). Ireland: Towards an integrated public service. Paris: OECD.
  25. Office of the Comptroller and Auditor General. (2005). Special report 51 – Development of human resource management system for the health service. Dublin: Office of the Comptroller and Auditor General.
  26. Peters B. G., Rhodes R. A. W., & Wright V. (2000). Staffing the summit – The administration of the core executive: Convergent trends and national specificities. In B. G. Peters, R. A. W. Rhodes, & V. Wright (Eds), Administering the summit. Transforming government (pp. 3–24). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  27. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, C. (2017). Public management Reform: A comparative analysis – Into the age of austerity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  28. Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1973). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  29. Public Services Organisation Review Group. (1969). Report of the Public Services Organisation Review Group [The Devlin report]. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
  30. Randma-Liiv, T., & Kickert, W. (2017). The impact of the fiscal crisis on public administration reforms: Comparison of 14 European countries. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 19 (2), 155–72. doi: 10.1080/13876988.2015.112973710.1080/13876988.2015.1129737
  31. Rhodes, R. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  32. Thompson, G., Frances, J., Levačić, R., & Mitchell, J. (1991). Markets, hierarchies & networks: The coordination of social life. London: Sage.
  33. Torfing, J., Andersen, L. B., Greve, C., & Klausen, K. K. (2020). Public governance paradigms: Competing and co-existing. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781788971225
  34. Ward, T. (2018). Critical junctures and the Department of Finance: From DPS to DPER? Irish Political Studies, 33 (1): 68–87. doi: 10.1080/07907184.2017.128125110.1080/07907184.2017.1281251
  35. Wynen, J., Verhoest, K., & Kleizen, B. (2019). Are public organizations suffering from repetitive change injury? A panel study of the damaging effect of intense reform sequences. Governance, 32 (4), 695–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.1240410.1111/gove.12404
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2020-0022 | Journal eISSN: 2449-9471 | Journal ISSN: 0001-8325
Language: English
Page range: 27 - 40
Published on: Dec 31, 2020
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2020 Muiris MacCarthaigh, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.