Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assessment of the Welfare of Extensively Managed Autochtonous Sheep Breed Vlasicka Zackel using Animal-Based Measurements Cover

Assessment of the Welfare of Extensively Managed Autochtonous Sheep Breed Vlasicka Zackel using Animal-Based Measurements

Open Access
|Jun 2020

References

  1. 1. EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW): Statement on the use of animal-based measures to assess the welfare of animals. EFSA Journal 2012, 10(6): 2767, 29.10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2767
  2. 2. FAO STATISTICAL YEAR BOOK (FAOSTAT). World food and agriculture. Rome, 2019. Production of sheep in the world. [http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QA/visualize].
  3. 3. EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare: Scientific Opinion on the welfare risks related to the farming of sheep for wool, meat and milk production. EFSA Journal 2014, 12:1–128.10.2903/sp.efsa.2015.EN-738
  4. 4. Morris S: Overview of sheep production systems. In: Ferguson D, Lee C, Fisher A, editors. Advances in sheep welfare. 1st edition. Woodhead Publishing; 2017, 19–33.10.1016/B978-0-08-100718-1.00002-9
  5. 5. Goddard P, Waterhouse T, Dwyer C, Stott A: The perception of the welfare of sheep in extensive systems. Small Rumin Res 2006, 62: 215–225.10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.08.016
  6. 6. Richmond SE, Wemelsfelder F, de Heredia IB, Ruiz R, Canali E, Dwyer CM: Evaluation of Animal-Based Indicators to Be Used in a Welfare Assessment Protocol for Sheep. Front Vet Sci 2017, 4:210.10.3389/fvets.2017.00210573213929322048
  7. 7. Važić B, Rogić B, Drinić M, Savić N: Morphometric similarities and differences between tree genotype of pramenka sheep from central Bosnia. Biotechnol Anim Husb 2017, 33: 291-298.10.2298/BAH1703291V
  8. 8. AWIN welfare assessment protocol for sheep. DOI: 10.13130/AWIN_SHEEP_2015
  9. 9. Pulina G, Bencini R: Dairy Sheep Nutrition. CABI Publishing, Cambridge, Massachusetts; 2004, 222.10.1079/9780851996813.0000
  10. 10. Everett-Hincks JM, Blair HT, Stafford KJ, Lopez-Villalobos N, Kenyon PR, Morris ST: The effect of pasture allowance during pregnancy on maternal behavior and lamb rearing performance in highly fecund ewes. Livest Prod Sci 2005 97: 253-266.10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.05.006
  11. 11. Dwyer C: The behaviour of sheep and goats. In: Per Jensen. The Ethology of Domestic Animals, 3rd edition: an Introductory Text, CABI Publishing, United Kingdom; 2017, 199-214.10.1079/9781786391650.0199
  12. 12. Munoz CA, Campbell AJD, Hemsworth PH, Doyle RE: Evaluating the welfare of extensively managed sheep. PLoS One 2019, 14(6): e0218603.10.1371/journal.pone.0218603658396931216326
  13. 13. Verbeek E, Oliver MH, Waas JR, McLeay LM, Blache D, Matthews LR: Reduced cortisol and metabolic responses of thin ewes to an acute cold challenge in mid-pregnancy: implications for animal physiology and welfare. PLoS One 2012, 7: e37315.10.1371/journal.pone.0037315
  14. 14. Caldeira RM, Belo AT, Santos CC, Vazques MI, Portugal A V: The effect of body condition score on blood metabolites and hormonal profiles in ewes hormonal profiles in ewes. Small Rumin Res 2007, 68: 233–241.10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.08.027
  15. 15. Morgan-Davies C, Waterhouse A, Pollock ML, and Milner JM: Body condition score as indicator of ewe survival under extensive conditions. Anim Welf 2008, 17: 71-77.10.1017/S0962728600032000
  16. 16. Mutinati M, Piccinno M, Roncetti M, Campanile D, Rizzo A, Sciorsci RL: Oxidative stress during pregnancy in the sheep. Review article. Reprod Domest Anim 2013, 48:353–357.10.1111/rda.12141
  17. 17. McGregor BA: Incisor development, wear and loss in sheep and their impacton ewe production, longevity and economics: A review. Small Rumin 2011, 95: 79–87.10.1016/j.smallrumres.2010.11.012
  18. 18. Waterhouse A: Animal welfare and sustainability of production under extensive systems – A European perspective. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1996, 49: 29-4010.1016/0168-1591(95)00665-6
  19. 19. Færevik G, Andersen IL, Bøe KE: Preferences of sheep for different types of pen flooring. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2005, 90: 265–276.10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.010
  20. 20. Vučinić M: Ponašanje, dobrobit i zaštita životinja VKS, Beograd, 2004, 388.
  21. 21. Hosie BD: Infectious Keratoconjunctivitis. Aitken ID, ed. Diseases of Sheep: Blackwell Publishing; 2007, 342–345.
  22. 22. Schreiner D, Ruegg PL: Relationship between udder and leg hygiene scores and subclinical mastitis. J Dairy Sci 2003, 86: 3460–3465.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73950-2
  23. 23. Winter AC: Lameness in sheep. Small Rumin Res 2008, 76: 149–153.10.1016/j.smallrumres.2007.12.008
  24. 24. Fitzpatrick J, Scott M, Nolan A: Assessment of pain and welfare in sheep. Small Rumin Res 2006, 62: 55–61.10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.07.028
  25. 25. Dwyer CM, Lawrence AB: The Welfare of Sheep, in: Dwyer, C.M. (Ed.): The Welfare of Sheep. Springer Science and Business Media BV; 2008, 1–40.10.1007/978-1-4020-8553-6_1
  26. 26. Goddard P: Welfare assessment in sheep In Practice 2011, 33: 508-516.10.1136/inp.d7316
  27. 27. Fragkou I, Boscos CM, Fthenakis GC: Diagnosis of clinical or subclinical mastitis in ewes. Small Rumin Res 2014; 118: 86–92.10.1016/j.smallrumres.2013.12.015
  28. 28. Law on Animal Husbandry in Bosnia and Herzegovina (“Sl. novine FBiH”, 66, 28 Avgust 2013)
  29. 29. Hemsworth P: Human–animal interactions in livestock production. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2003, 81: 185–198.10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00280-0
  30. 30. Boivin X, Lensink J, Tallet C, Veissier I: Stockmanship and farm animal welfare. Anim Welf 2003, 12: 479–492.10.1017/S0962728600026075
  31. 31. Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ: Improving the attitude and behaviour of stockpersons towards pigs and the consequences on the behaviour and reproductive performance of commercial pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1994, 39, 349–362.10.1016/0168-1591(94)90168-6
  32. 32. Boissy A, Bouissou M: Assessment of individual differences in behavioural reactions of heifers exposed to various fear-eliciting situations. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1995, 46: 17–31.10.1016/0168-1591(95)00633-8
  33. 33. Waiblinger S, Boivin X, Pedersen V, Tosi M, Janczak A, Visser E, Jones R: Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed species: A critical review. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2006, 101: 185–242.10.1016/j.applanim.2006.02.001
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acve-2020-0015 | Journal eISSN: 1820-7448 | Journal ISSN: 0567-8315
Language: English
Page range: 207 - 218
Submitted on: Jun 21, 2019
|
Accepted on: Feb 6, 2020
|
Published on: Jun 8, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2020 Nenadović Katarina, Karać Petar, Vučinić Marijana, Teodorović Radislava, Živanov Dragan, Trailović Ružica, Beckei Zsolt, Janković Ljiljana, published by University of Belgrade, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.