Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Antimicrobial Resistance as a Problem for the Quality of Boar Semen Cover

Antimicrobial Resistance as a Problem for the Quality of Boar Semen

Open Access
|Apr 2020

References

  1. 1. Cottell E, Harrison R.F, McCaffrey M, Walsh T, Mallon E, Barry-Kinsella C: Are seminal fluid microorganisms of significance or merely contaminants?. Fertil Steril 2000, 74, 465-470.10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00709-3
  2. 2. Žura Zaja I, Samardžija M, Vince S, Majić-Balić I, Vilić M, Ðuričcić D, Milinković-Tur S: Influence of boar breeds or hybrid genetic composition onsemen quality and seminal plasma biochemical variables. Anim Reprod Sci, 2016, 164, 169-17610.1016/j.anireprosci.2015.11.02726692346
  3. 3. Althouse GC. and Lu KG: Bacteriospermia in extended porcine semen. Theriogenology 2005, 63, 573-584.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.03115626417
  4. 4. Morrell JM, Wallgren M: Removal of bacteria from boar ejaculates by single layer centrifugation can reduce the use of antibiotics in semen extenders. Anim Reprod Sci 2011, 123, 64–69.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.11.00521145185
  5. 5. Althouse GC, Pierdon MS, Lu KG:Thermotemporal dynamics of contaminant bacteria and antimicrobials in extended porcine semen. Theriogenology 2008, 70, 1317–1323.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.07.01018774598
  6. 6. Bussalleu E, Yeste M, Sepúlveda L, Torner E, Pinart E, Bonet B: Effects of different concentrations of enterotoxigenic and verotoxigenic E. coli on boar sperm quality. Anim Reprod Sci 2011, 127, 176–182.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.07.01821907505
  7. 7. Ubeda JL, Ausejo R, Dahmani Y, Falceto MV, Usan A, Malo C:Adverse effects of members of the Enterobacteriaceae family on boar sperm quality. Theriogenology 2013, 80, 565–570.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.05.02223827823
  8. 8. Fraczek M, Hryhorowicz M, Gaczarzewicz D, Szumala-Kakol A, Kolanowski TJ, Beutin L: Can apoptosis and necrosis coexist in ejaculated human spermatozoa during in vitro semen bacterial infection?. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015, 32, 771–779.10.1007/s10815-015-0462-x442945225808020
  9. 9. Köhn FM, Erdmann I, Oeda T, El Mulla KF, Schiefer HG, Schill WB: Influence of urogenital infections on sperm functions. Andrologia 1998, 30, 73–80.10.1111/j.1439-0272.1998.tb02829.x9629446
  10. 10. Diemer T, Huwe P, Michelmann HW, Mayer F, Schiefer HG, Weidner W: Escherichia coli-induced alterations of human spermatozoa. An electron microscopy analysis. Int J Androl 2000, 23, 178–186.10.1046/j.1365-2605.2000.00224.x10844544
  11. 11. Zan Bar T, Yehuda R, HachamT, Krupnik S, BartoovB: Influence of Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus on ram sperm cell quality. J Med Microbiol 2008, 57, 1405–1410.10.1099/jmm.0.2008/001057-018927420
  12. 12. Prieto-Martínez N, Bussalleu E, Gracia-Bonavila E, Bonet S, Yeste M: Effects of Enterobacter cloacae on boar sperm quality during liquid storage at 17°C. Anim Reprod Sci 2014, 148, 72–82.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.05.00824880981
  13. 13. Monga M and Roberts JA:Spermagglutination by bacteria: receptor-specific interactions. J Androl 1994, 15, 151–156.
  14. 14. Schulz M, Sánchez R, Soto L, Risopatrón J, Villegas J: Effect of Escherichia coli and its soluble factors on mitochondrial membrane potential, phosphatidylserine translocation, viability, and motility of human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 2010, 94, 619–623.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.14019324341
  15. 15. Gączarzewicz D, Udała J, Piasecka M, Błaszczyk B, Stankiewicz T: Bacterial contamination of boar semen and its relationship to sperm quality preserved in commercial extender containing gentamicin sulfate. Pol J Vet Sci 2016, 19, 3, 451–459.10.1515/pjvs-2016-005727760038
  16. 16. International ISO standard 8607, First Edition 2003-02-01 Clean the sensitive animal – Frozen seed of breeding bulls - Number of live aerobic microorganisms, Reference number ISO 8607: 2003 (E)
  17. 17. Rozeboom JK: Evaluating Boar Semen Quality. Animal science facts, Extension Swine Husbandry. North Carolina State University 2000., College of Agriculture & Life Sciences. Publication number: ANS00-812S.
  18. 18. Heriberto Rodriguez-Martinez: Semen evaluation: can we forecast fertility?. Vet stanica 2019, 50, 293-305
  19. 19. Apić J, Stančić I., Vakanjac S, Radović I, Milovanović A, Barna T, Maletić M.,: Influence of the protein content of boar seminal plasma on spermatozoa viability, motility and acrosome integrity in diluted semen stored for 3 days. Animal Reproduction,2016, v.13, n.1, p.36-4110.21451/1984-3143-AR792
  20. 20. Maes D, Nauwynck H, Rijsselaere T, Mateusen B, Vyt P, de Kruif A, Van Soom A: Diseases in swine transmitted by artificial insemination: An overview.Theriogenology 2008, 70, 8, 1337-1345.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.06.01818657310
  21. 21. Maroto Martín LO, Muñoz EC, De Cupere F, Van Driessche E, Echemendia-Blanco D, Rodríguez JMM, Beeckmans S: Bacterial contamination of boar semen affects the litter size. Anim Reprod Sci 2010, 120, 95–104.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.03.00820427136
  22. 22. Bresciani C, Cabassi CS, Morini G, Taddei S, Bettini R, Bigliardi E, Di Ianni F,Sabbioni A, Parmigiani E: Boar semen bacterial contamination in Italy and antibiotic efficacy in a modified extender. Ital. J. Anim Sci 2014, 13, 83–87.10.4081/ijas.2014.3082
  23. 23. Schulze M, Dathe M, Waberski D, Müller K: Liquid storage of boar semen: Current and future perspectives on the use of cationic antimicrobial peptides to replace antibiotics in semen extenders. Theriogenology 2016, 85, 39–46.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.07.01626264695
  24. 24. Okazaki T, Mihara T, Fujita Y, Yoshida S, Teshima H, Shimada M: Polymyxin B neutralizes bacteria-released endotoxin and improves the quality of boar sperm during liquid storage and cryopreservation. Theriogenology 2010, 74, 1691–1700.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.05.01920615528
  25. 25. Kaur K. and Prabha V: Sperm Impairment by sperm agglutinating factor isolated from Escherichia coli: receptor specific interactions. Biomed Res Int 2013, 1, 2, 548-497.10.1155/2013/548497373038523956989
  26. 26. Pirnay JP, Matthijs S, Colak H, Chablain P, Bilocq F, Van Eldere J: Global Pseudomonas aeruginosa biodiversity as reflected in a Belgian river. Environ Microbiol 2005, 7, 7, 969-80.10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00776.x15946293
  27. 27. Heck LW, Morihara K, Abrahamson DR: Degradation of soluble laminin and depletion of tissue-associated basement membrane laminin by Pseudomonas aeruginosa elastase and alkaline protease. Infect Immun 1986, 54, 1, 149-53.10.1128/iai.54.1.149-153.19862601293093382
  28. 28. Lamont IL and Martin LW: Identification and characterization of novel pyoverdine synthesis genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiology 2003, 149, 4, 833-842.10.1099/mic.0.26085-012686626
  29. 29. Jimenez PN, Koch G, Thompson JA, Xavier KB, Cool RH, Quax WJ: The multiple signalling systems regulating virulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2012, 76, 1, 46-65.10.1128/MMBR.05007-11329442422390972
  30. 30. Schulze M, Ammon C, Rüdiger K, Jung M, Grobbel M: Analysis of hygienic critical control points in boar semen production. Theriogenology 2015, 83, 430–437.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.10.00425459424
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acve-2020-0010 | Journal eISSN: 1820-7448 | Journal ISSN: 0567-8315
Language: English
Page range: 136 - 146
Accepted on: Mar 12, 2020
Published on: Apr 3, 2020
Published by: University of Belgrade, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2020 Igor Stojanov, Aleksandar Milovanović, Tomislav Barna, Jasna Prodanov Radulović, Jelena Apić, Dragica Stojanović, Nevena Maksimović, published by University of Belgrade, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.