Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Physics-Stabilized Self-Updating Digital Twin Framework Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Thermal Field Prediction Cover

A Physics-Stabilized Self-Updating Digital Twin Framework Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Thermal Field Prediction

Open Access
|Mar 2026

References

  1. W. Birk, R. Hostettler, M. Razi, K. Atta, and R. Tammia, “Automatic generation and updating of process industrial digital twins for estimation and control: A review,” Frontiers in Control Engineering, vol. 3, Aug. 2022, Art. no. 954858. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcteg.2022.954858
  2. A. Kantaros, T. Ganetsos, E. Pallis, and M. Papoutsidakis, “From mathematical modeling and simulation to digital twins: Bridging theory and digital realities in industry and emerging technologies,” Applied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 16, Aug. 2025, Art. no. 9213. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15169213
  3. H. Peter, Digital Twins and AI: Real-Time Simulation of Complex Systems, Apr. 2025.
  4. M. Diakité and M. K. Traore, “Formalizing a framework of inference capabilities for digital twin engineering,” SIMULATION, vol. 100, no. 9, pp. 887–902, Jan. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/00375497241228281
  5. Y. Tang, M. R. Dehaghani, and G. G. Wang, “Capturing lifecycle system degradation in digital twin model updating,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08953, Mar. 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.08953
  6. T. Wu, F. Yang, U. Farooq, X. Li, and J. Jiang, “An online learning method for constructing self-update digital twin model of power transformer temperature prediction,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 237, Jan. 2024, Art. no. 121728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121728
  7. S. Cai, Z. Wang, S. Wang, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis., “Physics-informed neural networks for heat transfer problems,” Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 143, no. 6, June 2021, Art. no. 060801. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4050542
  8. R. Laubscher, “Simulation of multi-species flow and heat transfer using physics-informed neural networks,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 33, no. 8, Aug. 2021, Art. no. 087101. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0058529
  9. J. Xu, H. Wei, and H. Bao, “Physics-informed neural networks for studying heat transfer in porous media,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 217, Dec. 2023, Art. no. 124671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.124671
  10. S. Manavi, T. Becker, and E. Fattahi, “Enhanced surrogate modelling of heat conduction problems using physics-informed neural network framework,” International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 142, Mar. 2023, Art. no. 106662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2023.106662
  11. D. Jalili, S. Jang, M. Jadidi, G. Giustini, A. Keshmiri, and Y. Mahmoudi, “Physics-informed neural networks for heat transfer prediction in two-phase flows,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 221, Apr. 2024, Art. no. 125089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.125089
  12. J. Zheng, F. Li, and H. Huang, “T-phPINN: Physics-informed neural networks for solving 2D non-Fourier heat conduction equations,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 235, Dec. 2024, Art. no. 126216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2024.126216
  13. P. Cui, W. Fan, M. Yu, W. Liu, and Z. Liu, “Solution and applications of parameterized convective heat transfer equations using physics-informed neural networks,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 247, Sep. 2025, Art. no. 127040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2025.127040
  14. S. Pawar, O. San, B. Aksoylu, A. Rasheed, and T. Kvamsdal, “Physics guided machine learning using simplified theories,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 33, no. 1, Jan. 2021, Art. no. 011701. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0038929
  15. R. Rai and C. K. Sahu, “Driven by data or derived through physics? A review of hybrid physics guided machine learning techniques with cyber-physical system (CPS) focus,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 71050–71073, Apr. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2987324
  16. C. Meng, S. Griesemer, D. Cao, S. Seo, and Y. Liu, “When physics meets machine learning: A survey of physics-informed machine learning,” Machine Learning for Computational Science and Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, May 2025, Art. no. 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44379-025-00016-0
  17. S. M. Razak, J. Cornelio, Y. Cho, H.-H. Liu, R. Vaidya, and B. Jafarpour, “Physics-guided deep learning for improved production forecasting in unconventional reservoirs,” SPE Journal, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 2425–2447, Oct. 2023. https://doi.org/10.2118/214663-PA
  18. E. He, Y. Xie, L. Liu, Z. Jin, D. Zhang, and X. Jia, “Knowledge guided machine learning for extracting, preserving, and adapting physics-aware features,” in Proceedings of the 2024 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM), 2024, pp. 715–723. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611978032.82
  19. F. Zahra, J. Macedo, and C. Málaga-Chuquitaype, “Hybrid data-driven hazard-consistent drift models for SMRF,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1112–1135, Jan. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3807
  20. Q. Wang, F. Li, Y. Tang, and Y. Xu, “Integrating model-driven and data-driven methods for power system frequency stability assessment and control,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 4557–4568, May 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2919522
  21. H. Toubakh and M. Sayed-Mouchaweh, “Hybrid dynamic data-driven approach for drift-like fault detection in wind turbines,” Evolving Systems, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 115–129, Oct. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12530-014-9119-8
  22. F. Li, Q. Wang, Y. Tang, Y. Xu, and J. Dang, “Hybrid analytical and data-driven model based instance-transfer method for power system online transient stability assessment,” CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1664–1675, July 2021. https://doi.org/10.17775/CSEEJPES.2020.03880
  23. X.-B. Jin, R. J. R. Jeremiah, T.-L. Su, Y.-T. Bai, and J.-L. Kong, “The new trend of state estimation: From model-driven to hybrid-driven methods,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 6, Mar. 2021, Art. no. 2085. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21062085
  24. S. Windmann, “Data-driven fault detection in industrial batch processes based on a stochastic hybrid process model,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 3888–3902, Oct. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2021.3138925
  25. F. Balali, H. Seifoddini, and A. Nasiri, “Data-driven predictive model of reliability estimation using degradation models: A review,” Life Cycle Reliability and Safety Engineering, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 113–125, Feb. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41872-020-00111-6
  26. K. Kobayashi and S. B. Alam, “Explainable, interpretable, and trustworthy AI for an intelligent digital twin: A case study on remaining useful life,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 129, Mar. 2024, Art. no. 107620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107620
  27. S. Wang, X. Lai, X. He, Y. Qiu, and X. Song, “Building a trustworthy product-level shape-performance integrated digital twin with multifidelity surrogate model,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 144, no. 3, Mar. 2022, Art. no. 031703. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052390
  28. J. Jeon and G. Theotokatos, “A framework to assure the trustworthiness of physical model-based digital twins for marine engines,” Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, vol. 12, no. 4, Mar. 2024, Art. no. 595. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12040595
  29. N. Bicocchi, M. Fogli, C. Giannelli, M. Picone, and A. Virdis, “Requirements and design architecture for digital twin end-to-end trustworthiness,” IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 31–39, Mar. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2024.3376439
  30. Z. Pervez, Z. Khan, A. Ghafoor, and K. Soomro, “Signed: Smart city digital twin verifiable data framework,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 29430–29446, Mar. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3260621
  31. I. A. Ridhawi, S. Otoum, and M. Aloqaily, “Decentralized zero-trust framework for digital twin-based 6G,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.03107, Feb. 2023. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.03107
  32. K. Shaheen, M. A. Hanif, O. Hasan, and M. Shafique, “Continual learning for real-world autonomous systems: Algorithms, challenges and frameworks,” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, vol. 105, no. 1, Apr. 2022, Art. no. 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-022-01603-6
  33. X. Gu, J. Han, Q. Shen, and P. P. Angelov, “Autonomous learning for fuzzy systems: A review,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 7549–7595, Dec. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10355-6
  34. J. Zeng, S.-B. Lin, Y. Yao, and D.-X. Zhou, “On ADMM in deep learning: Convergence and saturation-avoidance,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 22, no. 1, Jan. 2021, Art. no. 199. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/3546258.3546457
  35. C. Wu, A. R. Kreidieh, K. Parvate, E. Vinitsky, and A. M. Bayen, “Flow: A modular learning framework for mixed autonomy traffic,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1270–1286, July 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2021.3087314
  36. K. G. Vamvoudakis, M. F. Miranda, and J. P. Hespanha, “Asymptotically stable adaptive–optimal control algorithm with saturating actuators and relaxed persistence of excitation,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 2386–2398, Oct. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2015.2487972
  37. W. Senn and S. Fusi, “Convergence of stochastic learning in perceptrons with binary synapses,” Physical Review E, vol. 71, no. 6, July 2005, Art. no. 061907. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.71.061907
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acss-2026-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8691 | Journal ISSN: 2255-8683
Language: English
Page range: 30 - 40
Submitted on: Jan 11, 2026
Accepted on: Mar 2, 2026
Published on: Mar 17, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2026 Aswin Karkadakattil, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.