Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Finite Mixed Extension of Dyadic Games and their Fair Solutions

Open Access
|May 2025

References

  1. K. Leyton-Brown and Y. Shoham, Essentials of Game Theory: A Concise, Multidisciplinary Introduction. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2008. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00108ED1V01Y200802AIM003
  2. R. B. Myerson, Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. Harvard University Press, 1997.
  3. V. V. Romanuke, “Pure strategies Pareto efficient situations versus pure strategies Nash equilibrium situations by their stochastically constrained payoffs in dyadic game modeling of resources rational usage with alternative choice of action,” Herald of Khmelnytskyi national university. Technical sciences, no. 6, pp. 140–143, 2014.
  4. T. C. Schelling, The Strategy of Conflict. Harvard University, 1980.
  5. J. Sostrin, The Manager’s Dilemma: Balancing the Inverse Equation of Increasing Demands and Shrinking Resources. New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137485809
  6. M. A. Ramírez, M. Smerlak, A. Traulsen, and J. Jost, “Diversity enables the jump towards cooperation for the Traveler’s Dilemma,” Scientific Reports, vol. 13, Jan. 2023, Art. no. 1441. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28600-5
  7. D. Redhead, M. Gervais, K. Kajokaite, J. Koster, A. H. Manyoma, D. H. Manyoma, R. McElreath, and C. T. Ross, “Evidence of direct and indirect reciprocity in network-structured economic games,” Communications Psychology, vol. 2, May 2024, Art. no. 44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-024-00098-1
  8. R. Xue and L. Xiong, “Two-stage evolutionary game model on complex networks for emergency logistics based on blockchain platform,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 256, Dec. 2024, Art. no. 124925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124925
  9. Y. Zhang and H. Zhao, “A multi-agent model for decision making on environmental regulation in urban agglomeration,” The Journal of Supercomputing, vol. 78, pp. 5588–5609, Mar. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-021-04094-8
  10. V. V. Romanuke, “Ecological-economic balance in fining environmental pollution subjects by a dyadic 3-person game model,” Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1451–1474, 2019. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1702_14511474
  11. R. Christmann, “Plea bargaining and investigation effort: inquisitorial criminal procedure as a three-player game,” European Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 56, pp. 497–532, Oct. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-023-09782-9
  12. A. Bharadwaj, V. H. Devaiah, and I. Gupta, “Comparative analysis of policy developments,” in: Locating Legal Certainty in Patent Licensing. Singapore, Springer, 2023, pp. 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0181-4_1
  13. U. Weiss and J. Agassi, “Game Theory and Social Science,” in Games to Play and Games not to Play. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol. 469. Cham, Springer, pp. 61–83, May 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27601-9_5
  14. G. J. Mailath and L. Samuelson, Repeated Games and Reputations: Long-Run Relationships. Oxford University Press, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195300796.001.0001
  15. V. V. Romanuke, “Environment guard model as dyadic three-person game with the generalized fine for the reservoir pollution,” Ecological Safety and Nature Management, vol. 6, pp. 77–94, 2010.
  16. J. F. Mignot, “Strategic behavior in road cycling competitions,” in The Economics of Professional Road Cycling. Sports Economics, Management and Policy, D. Van Reeth, Ed., vol. 19. Cham, Springer, 2022, pp. 227–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11258-4_10
  17. S. Phani Praveen, M. H. Ali, M. A., Jarwar, C. Prakash, C. Ravi Kishore Reddy, L. Malliga, and C. Chandru Vignesh, “6G assisted federated learning for continuous monitoring in wireless sensor network using game theory,” Wireless Networks, vol. 30, pp. 5211–5237, Feb. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-023-03249-0
  18. D. Fudenberg and J. Tirole, Game Theory. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1991.
  19. V. V. Romanuke, “Refinement of acyclic-and-asymmetric payoff aggregates of pure strategy efficient Nash equilibria in finite noncooperative games by maximultimin and superoptimality,” Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 178–199, Dec. 2021. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame210402178r
  20. P. Prokopovych and N. C. Yannelis, “On the existence of mixed strategy Nash equilibria,” Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol. 52, pp. 87–97, May 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmateco.2014.04.002
  21. V. V. Romanuke, “Adaptive finite approximation of continuous noncooperative games,” Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 31–41, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1615/JAutomatInfScien.v52.i10.20
  22. C. E. Lemke and J. T. Howson, “Equilibrium points of bimatrix games,” SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 413–423, 1964. https://doi.org/10.1137/0112033
  23. S. C. Kontogiannis, P. N. Panagopoulou, and P. G. Spirakis, “Polynomial algorithms for approximating Nash equilibria of bimatrix games,” Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 410, no. 17, pp. 1599–1606, Apr. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2008.12.033
  24. P. Bernhard and J. Shinar, “On finite approximation of a game solution with mixed strategies,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-9659(90)90054-F
  25. V. V. Romanuke, “Convergence and estimation of the process of computer implementation of the optimality principle in matrix games with apparent play horizon,” Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 49–56, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1615/JAutomatInfScien.v45.i10.70
  26. S. Yilmaz and S. Sen, “Chapter 2 – Metaheuristic approaches for solving multiobjective optimization problems,” in Comprehensive Metaheuristics, S. Mirjalili and A. H. Gandomi, Eds. Academic Press, 2023, pp. 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91781-0.00002-8
  27. H. Huang and Z. Hao, “Chapter 4 – Application of multiobjective optimization intelligence algorithms,” in Intelligent Algorithms, H. Huang and Z. Hao, Eds. Elsevier, 2024, pp. 143–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-21758-6.00004-8
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acss-2025-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8691 | Journal ISSN: 2255-8683
Language: English
Page range: 47 - 52
Published on: May 15, 2025
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Vadim Romanuke, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.