Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Method for Creating Domain-Specific Dataset Ontologies from Text in Uncontrolled English

Applied Computer Systems
Volume 30 (2025): Issue 1 (January 2025)
By:
Open Access
|Jan 2025

References

  1. I. Moreno-Montes de Oca, M. Snoeck, H. A. Reijers, and A. Rodríguez-Morffi, “A systematic literature review of studies on business process modeling quality,” Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 58, pp. 187–205, Feb. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.07.011
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. D. Orlovskyi and A. Kopp, “An approach to business process model structuredness analysis: Errors detection and cost-saving estimation,” in ICTERI 2021 Workshops, O. Ignatenko et al., Eds., in ICTERI 2021 Workshops. ICTERI 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1635. Springer, Cham, Sep. 2022, pp. 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14841-5_2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. M. Omar and G. Baryannis, “Semi-automated development of conceptual models from natural language text,” Data Knowl. Eng., vol. 127, May 2020, Art. no. 101796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2020.101796
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. T. Rozman, G. Polancic, and R. V. Horvat, “Analysis of most common process modeling mistakes in BPMN process models,” EuroSPI’2007, Sep. 2007. [Online]. Available: https://conference.eurospi.net/images/proceedings/EuroSPI2007-ISBN-978-3-9809145-6-7.pdf#page=30. Accessed on: Dec. 12, 2023.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. J. Herbst and D. Karagiannis, “An inductive approach to the acquisition and adaptation of workflow models,” in Proceedings of the IJCAI, 1999, pp. 52–57. [Online]. Available: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=03d2b48ef058590661877829529770de93f30d51. Accessed: Dec. 13, 2023.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. M. Osborne and C. K. MacNish, “Processing natural language software requirement specifications,” in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Requirements Engineering, Colorado Springs, CO, USA, Apr. 1996, pp. 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRE.1996.491451
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. K. R. Chowdhary, “Natural language processing,” in Fundamentals of Artificial Intelligence, K. R. Chowdhary, Ed. New Delhi: Springer India, Apr. 2020, pp. 603–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3972-7_19
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. F. Friedrich, J. Mendling, and F. Puhlmann, “Process model generation from natural language text,” in Advanced Information Systems Engineering. CAiSE 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, H. Mouratidis and C. Rolland, Eds., vol 6741. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 482–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21640-4_36
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. F. Lin, M. Yang, and Y. Pai, “A generic structure for business process modeling,” Bus. Process Manag. J., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 19–41, Mar. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150210418610
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. F. Bargiela-Chiappini, C. Nickerson, and B. Planken, “What is business discourse?” in Business Discourse. Research and Practice in Applied Linguistics, F. Bargiela-Chiappini, C. Nickerson, and B. Planken, Eds. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2013, pp. 3–44. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137024930_1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. T. Jacobs and R. Tschötschel, “Topic models meet discourse analysis: a quantitative tool for a qualitative approach,” Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 469–485, Sep. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1576317
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. V. Dogra et al., “A complete process of text classification system using state-of-the-art NLP models,” Comput. Intell. Neurosci., vol. 2022, Jun. 2022, Art. no. e1883698. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1883698
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. A. Bhardwaj, Y. Narayan, and M. Dutta, “Sentiment analysis for Indian stock market prediction using Sensex and Nifty,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 70, pp. 85–91, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.10.043
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. A. Ittoo and A. van den Bosch, “Text analytics in industry: Challenges, desiderata and trends,” Comput. Ind., vol. 78, pp. 96–107, May 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.12.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. V. Prokhorov, M. T. Pilehvar, D. Kartsaklis, P. Lio, and N. Collier, “Unseen word representation by aligning heterogeneous lexical semantic spaces,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 33, no. 1, 2019, pp. 6900–6907. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33016900
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. E. Darics and J. Clifton, “Making applied linguistics applicable to business practice. Discourse analysis as a management tool,” Appl. Linguist., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 917–936, Dec. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy040
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. S. Xu, “Bayesian Naïve Bayes classifiers to text classification,” J. Inf. Sci., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 48–59, Feb. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551516677946
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. G. H. John and P. Langley, “Estimating continuous distributions in Bayesian classifiers,” ArXiv Prepr. ArXiv13024964, Feb. 2013. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1302.4964
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. X. Luo, “Efficient English text classification using selected Machine Learning Techniques,” Alex. Eng. J., vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 3401–3409, Jun. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.02.009
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. N. Ur-Rahman and J. A. Harding, “Textual data mining for industrial knowledge management and text classification: A business oriented approach,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 4729–4739, Apr. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.124
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. P. Sunagar, A. Kanavalli, S. S. Nayak, S. R. Mahan, S. Prasad, and S. Prasad, “News topic classification using machine learning techniques,” in International Conference on Communication, Computing and Electronics Systems, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, V. Bindhu, J. M. R. S. Tavares, A.-A. A. Boulogeorgos, and C. Vuppalapati, Eds., vol. 733. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021, pp. 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4909-4_35
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. S. Godbole and S. Roy, “Text classification, business intelligence, and interactivity: automating C-Sat analysis for services industry,” in Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, Las Vegas Nevada USA, Aug. 2008, pp. 911–919. https://doi.org/10.1145/1401890.1401999
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. V. A. Zeithaml, M. J. Bitner, and D. D. Gremler, “The gaps model of service quality,” Serv. Mark., pp. 37–49, 1996.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. S. Albitar, S. Fournier, and B. Espinasse, “An effective TF/IDF-based text-to-text semantic similarity measure for text classification,” in Web Information Systems Engineering – WISE 2014, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8786, B. Benatallah, A. Bestavros, Y. Manolopoulos, A. Vakali, and Y. Zhang, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014, pp. 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11749-2_8
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. H. Leopold, Ed., Natural Language in Business Process Models: Theoretical Foundations, Techniques, and Applications, LNBIP, vol. 168. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04175-9
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. K. Honkisz, K. Kluza, and P. Wiśniewski, “A concept for generating business process models from natural language description,” in Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management: 11th International Conference, KSEM 2018, Part I 11, Changchun, China, Aug. 2018, pp. 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99365-2_8
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. M. Camargo, M. Dumas, and O. González-Rojas, “Learning accurate LSTM models of business processes,” in Business Process Management, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, T. Hildebrandt, B. F. Van Dongen, M. Röglinger, and J. Mendling, Eds., vol. 11675. Cham: Springer International Publishing, July 2019, pp. 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26619-6_19
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. M. Kocbek, G. Jost, M. Hericko, and G. Polancic, “Business process model and notation: The current state of affairs,” Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 509–539, 2015. https://doi.org/10.2298/CSIS140610006K
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. M. El Kassis, F. Trousset, N. Daclin, and G. Zacharewicz, “Business process web-based platform for multi modeling and simulation,” in JFMS 2022-Les Journées Francophones de la Modélisation et de la Simulation: Ingénierie Dirigée par les Modèles pour la Théorie de la Modélisation et de la Simulation et les Systèmes Multi-Agents, cepadues, 2022.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. J. Erasmus, I. Vanderfeesten, K. Traganos, and P. Grefen, “Using business process models for the specification of manufacturing operations,” Comput. Ind., vol. 123, Dec. 2020, Art. no. 103297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103297
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. M. Wiemuth, D. Junger, M. A. Leitritz, J. Neumann, T. Neumuth, and O. Burgert, “Application fields for the new object management group (OMG) standards case management model and notation (CMMN) and decision management notation (DMN) in the perioperative field,” Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg., vol. 12, pp. 1439–1449, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1608-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. R. Kumar, K. S. R. Murthy, J. Ramesh Babu, and A. Shaik, “Live text analyzer to detect unsolicited messages using count vectorizer,” J. Eng. Sci., vol. 14, no. 06, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://jespublication.com/uploads/2023-V14I60100.pdf. Accessed on: Jan. 02, 2024.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. R. Odegua, “An empirical study of ensemble techniques (bagging, boosting and stacking),” in Proc. Conf.: Deep Learn. IndabaXAt, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rising-Odegua/publication/338681864_An_Empirical_Study_of_Ensemble_Techniques_Bagging_Boosting_and_Stacking/links/5e2417c2458515ba2092f5cf/An-Empirical-Study-of-Ensemble-Techniques-Bagging-Boosting-and-Stacking.pdf. Accessed on: Nov. 12, 2023.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. G. Kunapuli, Ensemble Methods for Machine Learning. Simon and Schuster, 2023.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. T.-T. Wong and H.-C. Tsai, “Multinomial naïve Bayesian classifier with generalized Dirichlet priors for high-dimensional imbalanced data,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 228, Sep. 2021, Art. no. 107288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107288
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. L. Jiang, S. Wang, C. Li, and L. Zhang, “Structure extended multinomial naive Bayes,” Inf. Sci., vol. 329, pp. 346–356, Feb. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2015.09.037
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. E. Mayoraz and E. Alpaydin, “Support vector machines for multi-class classification,” in Engineering Applications of Bio-Inspired Artificial Neural Networks, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, J. Mira and J. V. Sánchez-Andrés, Eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999, pp. 833–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0100551
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. J. Weston and C. Watkins, “Support vector machines for multi-class pattern recognition.,” in Esann, 1999, pp. 219–224. [Online]. Available: https://www.esann.org/sites/default/files/proceedings/legacy/es1999-461.pdf. Accessed on: Nov. 12, 2023.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. W. S. Noble, “What is a support vector machine?” Nat. Biotechnol., vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1565–1567, Dec. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1206-1565
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. R. Flowers and C. Edeki, “Business process modeling notation,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Mob. Comput., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 35–40, Mar. 2013. https://ijcsmc.com/docs/papers/March2013/V2I3201305.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. I. Mel’čuk and A. Polguere, “A formal lexicon in meaning-text theory (or how to do lexica with words),” Comput. Linguist., vol. 13, pp. 261–275, 1987.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. J. Mendling, Metrics for Process Models: Empirical Foundations of Verification, Error Prediction, and Guidelines for Correctness, vol. 6. Springer Science & Business Media, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=LDUh05-ZkkC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Mendling,J.:MetricsforProcessModels:EmpiricalFoundationsofVerification,Error+Prediction,+and+Guidelines+for+Correctness.+LNBIP,+vol.+6.+Springer,+Heidelberg+(1974)&ots=7ZlqcB4No9&sig=SNjDw5vugvHaH1F22Lk3aRnGrJ8. Accessed: Dec. 19, 2023.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. S. Qaiser and R. Ali, “Text mining: use of TF-IDF to examine the relevance of words to documents,” Int. J. Comput. Appl., vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 25–29, July 2018. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2018917395
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. N. Japkowicz, “Why question machine learning evaluation methods,” in AAAI workshop on evaluation methods for machine learning, 2006, pp. 6–11. [Online]. Available: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=46ecd8f4708764a9c5efb4916395f5d013b970cb. Accessed: Nov. 12, 2023.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. S. S. Biswas, “Role of Chat GPT in public health,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 868–869, Mar. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03172-7
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. I. Adeshola and A. P. Adepoju, “The opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in education,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1–14, Sep. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2253858
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. B. D. Lund and T. Wang, “Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries?” Libr. Hi Tech News, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 26–29, Feb. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. M. Dumas, M. La Rosa, J. Mendling, and H. A Reijers, Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer, Mar. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33143-5
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acss-2025-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8691 | Journal ISSN: 2255-8683
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 11
Submitted on: Dec 9, 2024
Accepted on: Jan 3, 2025
Published on: Jan 21, 2025
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Business process modelling,
domain analysis,
natural language processing,
ontology
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Artificial intelligence,
Information technology,
Project management,
Software development

© 2025 Shokoufeh Salem Minab, Erika Nazaruka, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 30 (2025): Issue 1 (January 2025)Next article