Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Expert Survey on Current Trends in Agile, Disciplined and Hybrid Practices for Software Development

Open Access
|Jun 2021

References

  1. [1] M. Kuhrmann, P. Diebold, J. Munch, P. Tell, K. Trektere, F. McCaffery, V. Garousi, M. Felderer, O. Linssen, E. Hanser, and C. R. Prause, “Hybrid Software Development Approaches in Practice: A European Perspective,” IEEE Software, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 20–31, Jul. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2018.11016124510.1109/MS.2018.110161245
  2. [2] M. Singh, N. Chauhan and R. Popli, “A Framework for Transitioning of Traditional Software Development Method To Distributed Agile Software Development,” in 2019 International Conference on Issues and Challenges in Intelligent Computing Techniques (ICICT), Ghaziabad, India, Sep. 2019, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICT46931.2019.897765410.1109/ICICT46931.2019.8977654
  3. [3] S. Komai, H. Nakanishi and H. Saidi, “Guidelines for Selecting Agile Development Method in System Requirements Definition,” in 2017 7th IEEE International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE), Penang, Nov. 2017, pp. 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSCE.2017.828437810.1109/ICCSCE.2017.8284378
  4. [4] S. A. Ruk, M. F. Khan, S. G. Khan, and S. M. Zia, “A Survey on Adopting Agile Software Development: Issues & Its impact on Software Quality,” in 2019 IEEE 6th International Conference on Engineering Technologies and Applied Sciences (ICETAS), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Dec. 2019, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETAS48360.2019.911732410.1109/ICETAS48360.2019.9117324
  5. [5] L. R. Vijayasarathy and C. W. Butler, “Choice of Software Development Methodologies: Do Organizational, Project, and Team Characteristics Matter?,” IEEE Software, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 86–94, Sep. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2015.2610.1109/MS.2015.26
  6. [6] H. Ishii, K. Maruya, T. Habara and H. Washizaki, “Compatibility Assessment Method for Agile Development Based on Project Characteristics,” SIG Technical Reports, vol. 2015-SE-187, no. 36, 2015.
  7. [7] A. Shimoda and T. Yabuki, “Cost and Value Analysis of Software Development Method Focused on Individual Function,” in 2017 Eighth International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Information Systems (ICICIS), Cairo, Dec. 2017, pp. 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1109/INTELCIS.2017.826005310.1109/INTELCIS.2017.8260053
  8. [8] J. Sheffield and J. Lemétayer, “Factors Associated with the Software Development Agility of Successful Projects,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 459–472, Apr. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.01110.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.011
  9. [9] T. Imani and M. Nakano, “Managing Large-Scale IT Projects: A Decision-Making Flow Using Plan-Driven and Agile Method for a Hybrid Approach,” Journal of the Society of Project Management, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 14–19, 2016.
  10. [10] A. Rauf and M. AlGhafees, “Gap Analysis between State of Practice and State of Art Practices in Agile Software Development,” in 2015 Agile Conference, Washington, DC, Aug. 2015, pp. 102–106. https://doi.org/10.1109/Agile.2015.2110.1109/Agile.2015.21
  11. [11] S. A. Ruk, M. F. Khan, S. G. Khan, and S. M. Zia, “A Survey on Adopting Agile Software Development: Issues & Its impact on Software Quality,” in 2019 IEEE 6th International Conference on Engineering Technologies and Applied Sciences (ICETAS), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Dec. 2019, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETAS48360.2019.911732410.1109/ICETAS48360.2019.9117324
  12. [12] B. Boehm and R. Turner, “Management Challenges to Implementing Agile Processes in Traditional Development Organizations,” IEEE Software, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 30–39, Sep. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2005.12910.1109/MS.2005.129
  13. [13] M. Marinho, J. Noll, I. Richardson, and S. Beecham, “Plan-Driven Approaches Are Alive and Kicking in Agile Global Software Development,” in 2019 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), Porto de Galinhas, Recife, Brazil, Sep. 2019, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2019.887016810.1109/ESEM.2019.8870168
  14. [14] K. K. Lija, K. Laakso, and J. Palomäki, “Using the Delphi Method,” in 2011 Proceedings of PICMET’11: Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET), Portland, OR, 2011, pp. 1–10
  15. [15] L. Leimane., O. Nikiforova. “Results from Expert Survey on System Analysis Process Activities”, in Applied Computer Systems, Vol. 24, Issue 2, pp. 141.-149., 2019. https://doi.org/10.2478/acss-2019-001810.2478/acss-2019-0018
  16. [16] O. Nikiforova and U. Sukovskis, “Framework for Comparison of System Modelling Tool”, in Proceedings of Fifth IEEE International Baltic Workshop on DB and IS, BalticDB&IS’2002, Tallinn, Estonia, Jan. 2002, vol. 1, pp. 63–70.
  17. [17] L. Madelāne, “Analytical Review on Agile, Disciplined and Hybrid Approaches to Software Development,” Bachelor thesis, Riga Technical University, 2020.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acss-2021-0005 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8691 | Journal ISSN: 2255-8683
Language: English
Page range: 38 - 43
Published on: Jun 4, 2021
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year

© 2021 Oksana Ņikiforova, Kristaps Babris, Linda Madelāne, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.