Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Mapping of Source and Target Data for Application to Machine Learning Driven Discovery of IS Usability Problems Cover

Mapping of Source and Target Data for Application to Machine Learning Driven Discovery of IS Usability Problems

Open Access
|Jun 2021

References

  1. [1] L. v. Bertalanffy, General System Theory. New York: George Brazillier, 1969.
  2. [2] Spencer Kinney Digital Marketing Agency, “Why Smooth User Experience (UX) is Vital For Business” [Online]. Available: https://www.spencerkinney.com/why-smooth-user-experience-ux-is-vital-for-business/ [Accessed: 18 Dec. 2020].
  3. [3] M. Chromik, F. Lachner, and A. Butz, “ML for UX? – An Inventory and Predictions on the Use of Machine Learning Techniques for UX Research”, in NordiCHI’20: Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society, Oct. 2020, Article No. 57 pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.342016310.1145/3419249.3420163
  4. [4] Q. Yu, X. Che, Y. Yang, and L. Wang, “A Transfer Learning Based Interpretable User Experience Model on Small Samples”, in 2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security, Jul. 2019, pp. 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS.2019.0003510.1109/QRS.2019.00035
  5. [5] J. Oh and U. Lee, “Exploring UX Issues in Quantified Self Technologies”, in 2015 Eighth International Conference on Mobile Computing and Ubiquitous Networking (ICMU), Jan. 2015, pp. 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMU.2015.706102810.1109/ICMU.2015.7061028
  6. [6] C. Y. Wong, K. Chu, and M. Pauzi, “Advocating UX Practice in Industry: Lessons Learnt from UX Innovate Bootcamp”, in 2016 4th International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr), Aug. 2016, pp. 204–209. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/IUSER.2016.785796110.1109/IUSER.2016.7857961
  7. [7] M. Pallot, K. Pawar, P. Krawczyk, M. Topolewski, A. Lecossier, and A. R. Abdel Razek, “Evaluating User eXperience as a Means to Reveal the Potential Adoption of Innovative Ideas”, in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), June 2020. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/ICE/ITMC49519.2020.919836810.1109/ICE/ITMC49519.2020.9198368
  8. [8] H. Degen, G. Guillen, and H. Schmidt, “Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit Ratio of Weekly User Group Sessions”, in Design, User Experience, and Usability. Design Philosophy and Theory, A. Marcus, W. Wang, Eds. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2019, HCII 2019, LNCS 11583, pp. 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23570-3_1610.1007/978-3-030-23570-3_16
  9. [9] G. Dove, K. Halskov, J. Forlizzi, and J. Zimmerman, “UX Design Innovation: Challenges for Working with Machine Learning as a Design Material”, in Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, May 2017, pp. 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.302573910.1145/3025453.3025739
  10. [10] L. J. Lopez, D. H. Garcia, M. Talancon, M. A. Camacho, A. F. Valentin, “Mathematical Modeling for Design Thinking Innovation Method Based on Markov Chain Theory”, NISCAIR-CSIR, pp. 135–138, 2019.
  11. [11] R. Hartson, and P. Pyla, The UX Book. 2019, 916 p.
  12. [12] S. Khan, and M. Iqbal, “AI-Powered Customer Service: Does it Optimize Customer Experience?”, in 2020 8th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions), Jun. 2020. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/ICRITO48877.2020.919800410.1109/ICRITO48877.2020.9198004
  13. [13] N. Behare, S. Waghulkar, and S. Shah, “A Theoretical Perspective on Customer Experience (CX) in Digital Business Strategy”, in 2018 International Conference on Research in Intelligent and Computing in Engineering (RICE), Aug. 2018. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/RICE.2018.850907910.1109/RICE.2018.8509079
  14. [14] J. Nielsen, “Enhancing the Explanatory Power of Usability Heuristics,” in CHI ‘94: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1994, pp. 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.19172910.1145/191666.191729
  15. [15] L. Sanchez-Adame, S. Mendoza, B. A. Gonzalez-Beltran, J. Rodriguez, and A. Meneses Viveros, “AUX and UX Evaluation of User Tools in Social Networks”, in 2018 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI), Dec. 2018. pp. 104–111. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/WI.2018.0-10110.1109/WI.2018.0-101
  16. [16] S. Filippi and D. Barattin, “User Experience (UX) Evaluation Based on Interaction-Related Mental Models”, Advances in Usability and User Experience, pp. 634–645, June 2018. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60492-3_6010.1007/978-3-319-60492-3_60
  17. [17] P. Buono, D. Caivano, M. F. Costabile, G. Desolda, and R. Lanzilotti, “Towards the Detection of UX Smells: The Support of Visualizations”, IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 6901–6914, Dec. 2019. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.296176810.1109/ACCESS.2019.2961768
  18. [18] C. Haughey, “How to Improve UX with AI and Machine Learning” [Online], July 2019. Available: https://www.springboard.com/blog/improve-ux-with-ai-machine-learning/ [Accessed: 14 Dec. 2020].
  19. [19] P. Osipov, L. Aleksejeva, A. Borisov, Y. Chizhov, T. Zmanovska, and V. Zabiniako, “Implementation and Operation Aspects of a System for Detecting Abnormally Level of User Activity”, Automatic Control and Computer Sciences, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 417–425, Nov. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3103/S014641161706005010.3103/S0146411617060050
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acss-2021-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8691 | Journal ISSN: 2255-8683
Language: English
Page range: 22 - 30
Published on: Jun 4, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Oksana Ņikiforova, Vitaly Zabiniako, Jurijs Kornienko, Madara Gasparoviča-Asīte, Amanda Siliņa, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.