Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Results From Expert Survey on System Analysis Process Activities Cover

Results From Expert Survey on System Analysis Process Activities

Applied Computer Systems
Volume 24 (2019): Issue 2 (December 2019)
By: Laima Leimane and  Oksana Nikiforova  
Open Access
|Feb 2020

References

  1. [1] A. Batool, Y. H. Motla, Bushra, S. Asghar, M. Riaz, M. Mukhtar, and M. Ahmed, “Comparative Study of Traditional Requirement Engineering and Agile Requirement Engineering” in International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), 2013, pp. 1006–1014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] K. S. Rubin. Essential Scrum: A Practical Guide to the Most Popular Agile Process. USA: Addison-Wesley Professional, 2012. 500 p. ISBN 978-0137043293.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] K. Beck, M. Beedle, A. van Bennekum, et al., Manifesto for Agile Software Development, 2001. [Online]. Available: http://agilemanifesto.org/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] W. Shim and S. W. Lee, “An Agile Approach for Managing Requirements to Improve Learning and Adaptability,” in 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW), 2017, pp. 435–438. https://doi.org/10.1109/REW.2017.4610.1109/REW.2017.46
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] N. Bik, G. Lucassen, and S. Brinkkemper, “A Reference Method for User Story Requirements in Agile Systems Development,” in 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW), 2017, pp. 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1109/REW.2017.8310.1109/REW.2017.83
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] K. Pohl and C. Rupp, Requirements Engineering Fundamentals: A Study Guide for the Certified Professional for Requirements Engineering Exam – Foundation Level – IREB compliant, 2nd ed. USA: Rocky Nook Inc., 2015. 184 p. ISBN 978-1937538774.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] P. Kummler, L. Vernisse, and H. Fromm, “How Good Are My Requirements?: A New Perspective on the Quality Measurement of Textual Requirements,” in 11th International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC), 2018, pp. 156–159. https://doi.org/10.1109/QUATIC.2018.0003110.1109/QUATIC.2018.00031
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] R. R. Maiti and F. J. Mitropoulos, “Prioritizing Non-Functional Requirements in Agile Software Engineering” in Proceedings of the SouthEast Conference (ACM SE ‘17), 2017, pp. 212–214. https://doi.org/10.1145/3077286.307756510.1145/3077286.3077565
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] J. Slankas and L. Williams, “Automated Extraction of Non-functional Requirements in Available Documentation,” in 1st International Workshop on Natural Language Analysis in Software Engineering (NaturaLiSE), 2013, pp. 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/NAturaLiSE.2013.661171510.1109/NAturaLiSE.2013.6611715
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] S. Anwer, L. Wen, and Z. Wang, “A Systematic Approach for Identifying Requirement Change Management Challenges: Preliminary Results” in Proceedings of the Evaluation and Assessment on Software Engineering (EASE ‘19), 2019, pp. 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319008.331903110.1145/3319008.3319031
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] F. Dalpiaz and S. Brinkkemper, “Agile Requirements Engineering With User Stories,” in 2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), Banff, AB, 2018, pp. 506–507. https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2018.0007510.1109/RE.2018.00075
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] A. O. J. Sabriye and W. M. N. W. Zainon, “A Framework for Detecting Ambiguity in Software Requirement Specification” in 2017 8th International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT), Amman, Jordan, 2017, pp. 209–2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITECH.2017.808000210.1109/ICITECH.2017.8080002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] L. Leimane and O. Ņikiforova, “Mapping of Activities for Object-Oriented System Analysis”, Applied Computer Systems, vol. 23, iss. 1, pp. 5–11, May 2018. https://doi.org/10.2478/acss-2018-000110.2478/acss-2018-0001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] O. Ņikiforova and U. Sukovskis, “Framework for Comparison of System Modelling Tools,” in Proceedings of Fifth IEEE International Baltic Workshop on DB and IS, BalticDB&IS’, vol. 1, 2002, pp. 63–70.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] L. Leimane, “Research on Usage of Object-Oriented System Analysis Methods for Software Requirement Determination,” Master thesis, Riga Technical University, 2018, 90 p.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] K. K. Lilja, K. Laakso, and J. Palomaki, “Using the Delphi Method,” in 2011 Proceedings of PICMET ‘11: Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET), 2011.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] H. B. Triantono, M. B. Susetyarto, “Technical Use of Analytical Hierarchy Process and Delphi Method in Determining Terminal Location Multi Function of Merak Port,” in 2017 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech), 2018, pp. 350–355. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech.2017.827356410.1109/ICIMTech.2017.8273564
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] A. Silva, P. R. Pinheiro, A. Albuquerque, and J. Barroso, “Evaluation of an Approach to Define Elicitation Guides of Non-Functional Requirements,” IET Software, vol. 11, iss. 5, pp. 221–228, Oct. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-sen.2016.030210.1049/iet-sen.2016.0302
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] D. Kung, J. Lei, “An Object-Oriented Analysis and Design Environment,” in 2016 IEEE 29th International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEET), 2016, pp. 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET.2016.2010.1109/CSEET.2016.20
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Q. Wei, G. Danwei, X. Yaohong, F. Jingtao et al., “Research on Software Development Process Conjunction of Scrum and UML modeling,” in 2014 Fourth International Conference on Instrumentation and Measurement, Computer, Communication and Control (IMCCC), 2014, pp. 978–982. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCCC.2014.20610.1109/IMCCC.2014.206
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] V. I. Abdulaev, Programmnaja inzhenerija: uchebnoe posobie, Ch. 1. Proektirovanie sistem. Russia: PGTU, 2016.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] K. Kluza, P. Wiśniewski, K. Jobczyk, A. Ligeza, “Comparison of Selected Modeling Notations for Process, Decision and System Modeling,” in 2017 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), 2017, pp. 1095–1098. https://doi.org/10.15439/2017F45410.15439/2017F454
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] S. Dragicevic, S. Celar, L. Novak, “Use of Method for Elicitation, Documentation and Validation of Software User Requirements (MEDoV) in Agile Software Development Projects,” in 2014 Sixth International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Communication Systems and Networks (CICSyN), 2014, pp. 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1109/CICSyN.2014.2710.1109/CICSyN.2014.27
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] A. Zeaaraoui, Z. Bougroun, M. G. Belkasmi, T. Bouchentouf, “User Stories Template for Object-Oriented Applications,” in 2013 Third International Conference on Innovative Computing Technology (INTECH), 2013, pp. 407–409. https://doi.org/10.1109/INTECH.2013.665368110.1109/INTECH.2013.6653681
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] “About the Decision Model and Notation specification version 1.0,” Object Management Group, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.omg.org/spec/DMN/1.0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] A. P. Murray, The Complete Software Project Manager: Mastering Technology From Planning to Launch and Beyond. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/978111922001510.1002/9781119220015
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] L. P. Binamungu, S. M. Embury, N. Konstantinou, “Maintaining Behaviour Driven Development Specifications: Challenges and Opportunities,” in 2018 IEEE 25th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER), 2018. pp. 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2018.833020710.1109/SANER.2018.8330207
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] A. Scholz, C. Hildebrandt, A. Fay, “Functional Modelling in Production Engineering Workflows,” in 2017 13th IEEE Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), 2018. pp. 695–700. https://doi.org/10.1109/COASE.2017.825618410.1109/COASE.2017.8256184
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] S. Ciemiņa, “Research of Object Oriented System Analysis Activities,” Master thesis, Riga Technical University, 2010, 65 p.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] M. Kassab, “An Empirical Study on the Requirements Engineering Practices for Agile Software Development,” in 2014 40th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, 2014, pp. 254–261. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2014.7710.1109/SEAA.2014.77
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] M. Kassab, “The Changing Landscape of Requirements Engineering Practices over the Past Decade,” in 2015 IEEE Fifth International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE), 2015, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/EmpiRE.2015.743129910.1109/EmpiRE.2015.7431299
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acss-2019-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8691 | Journal ISSN: 2255-8683
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 141 - 149
Published on: Feb 20, 2020
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open
Keywords:
Delphi method,
expert survey,
framework,
system analysis
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Artificial intelligence,
Information technology,
Project management,
Software development

© 2020 Laima Leimane, Oksana Nikiforova, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 24 (2019): Issue 2 (December 2019)Next article