Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Improvement of the Two-Hemisphere Model-Driven Approach for Generation of the UML Class Diagram Cover

Improvement of the Two-Hemisphere Model-Driven Approach for Generation of the UML Class Diagram

Applied Computer Systems
Volume 14 (2013): Issue 1 (June 2013)
By: Oksana Nikiforova,  Konstantins Gusarovs,  Olegs Gorbiks and  Natalja Pavlova  
Open Access
|Jun 2013

References

  1. [1] J. Krogstie, “Integrating enterprise and IS development using a model driven approach.” In: 13th International Conference on Information Systems Development - Advances in Theory, Practice and Education. Vasilecas O. et al. (Eds). Springer Science+Business media, Inc. 2005. pp.43-53.10.1007/0-387-28809-0_5
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] O. Nikiforova and M. Kirikova, “Two-Hemisphere Model Driven Approach: Engineering Based Software Development.” In: CAiSE 2004 16th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering June 7-11, Proceedings, 2004, pp. 219-233.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] O. Nikiforova., “General framework for object-oriented software development process” In: Scientific Proceedings of Riga Technical University (13), 2002, pp. 132-144.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. [4] O.Nikiforova, M.Kirikova, N.Pavlova, „Two-Hemisphere Driven Approach: Application for Knowledge Modelling”, In proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Baltic Conference on DB and IS (BalticDB&IS'2006), O. Vasilecas, J. Eder, A. Caplinskas (Eds.), Vilnius, Lithuania, 2006, pp. 244-250
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. [5] O. Nikiforova and N. Pavlova “Development of the Tool for Generation of UML Class Diagram from Two-Hemisphere Model.” In: Proceedings of The Third International Conference on Software Engineering Advances (ICSEA), International Workshop on Enterprise Information Systems (ENTISY). Mannaert H., Dini P., Ohta T., Pellerin R. (Eds.), Published by IEEE Computer Society, Conference Proceedings Services (CPS), 2008, pp. 105-112.10.1109/ICSEA.2008.37
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. [6] O. Nikiforova “Two Hemisphere Model Driven Approach for Generation of UML Class Diagram in the Context of MDA”, e- Informatics Software Engineering Journal - Volume 3, Issue 1, Huzar Z., Madeyski L. (eds.), Wrocław University of Technology, Institute of Applied Informatics, Wrocław University of Technology, Wrocław, Poland, Copyright by Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej, Wrocław, Poland, [Online]. Available: http://www.einformatyka.pl/wiki/e-Informatica_-_Volume_3, 2009, pp. 59-72.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. [7] O. Nikiforova and N. Pavlova. “Open Work of Two-Hemisphere Model Transformation Definition into UML Class Diagram in the Context of MDA” In: Software Engineering Techniques, 3rd IFIP TC2 Central and East European Conference on Software Engineering Techniques, Revised Selected Papers, Huzar Z. et al (Eds.), LNCS Sublibrary: SL 2 - Programming and Software Engineering, Springer, 2011, pp. 118-130.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] O. Nikiforova and N. Pavlova, “Foundations on generation of relationships between classes based on initial business knowledge.” In: Information Systems Development: Towards a Service Provision Society. Springer US, 2009, pp. 289-297.10.1007/b137171_30
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. [9] O.Nikiforova, N.Pavlova and J.Grigorjev, “Several Facilities of Class Diagram Generation from Two-Hemisphere Model” In: 23rd International Symposium on Computer and Information Sciences (ISCIS 2008). Istanbul, Turkey, 27-29 October 2008, [Online]. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/, 2008, pp.1-6.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] O.Nikiforova, “Object Interaction as a Central Component of Object- Oriented System Analysis.” In: International Conference „Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering” (ENASE 2010), Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop „Model Driven Architecture and Modelling Theory Driven Development” (MDA&MTDD 2010), Osis J., Nikiforova O. (Eds.), Greece, SciTePress. 2010, pp. 3-12.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] Website of BrainTool. [Online]. Available: braintool.rtu.lv/
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] O. Nikiforova, N. Pavlova, K. Gusarovs, O. Gorbiks, J. Vorotilovs, A. Zaharovs, D.Umanovskis, J. Sejans, “Development of the Tool for Transformation of the Two-Hemisphere Model to the UML Class Diagram: Technical Solutions and Lessons Learned”, Proceedings of the 5th International Scientific Conference „Applied Information and Communication Technology 2012”, held on 26-27 April 2012, in Jelgava, Latvia, 2012, pp. 11-19.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. [13] G. Booch, “Object-oriented analysis and design with applications”, Addison Wesley, 1986.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] J. Rumbaugh, M.Blaha, W.Premerlani, F.Eddy, W Lorensen, “Object Oriented modelling and design”, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc/, New Jersey, 1991.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. [15] P.P. Chen, “Historical Events, Future Trends, and Lessons Learned.” Software pioneers, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. New York, 2002, pp. 296 - 310.10.1007/978-3-642-59412-0_17
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. [16] A.Navasa, M. A.Pérez-Toledano, J. M. Murillo, “An ADL dealing with aspects at software architecture stage” Information and Software Technology 51, 2009, pp. 306-324.10.1016/j.infsof.2008.03.009
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. [17] S.V.Overmyer and O.Rambow, “Conceptual Modelling through Linguistics Analysis Using LIDA.” 23rd International Conference on Software engineering, July 2001.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. [18] H. M. Harmain and R.Gaizauskas “CM-Builder: A Natural Language- Based CASE Tool for Object- Oriented Analysis.” Automated Software Engineering. 10(2), 2003, pp.157-181.10.1023/A:1022916028950
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. [19] G.S.Anandha, G.V. Uma “Automatic Construction of Object Oriented Design Models [UML Diagrams] from Natural Language Requirements Specification” PRICAI 2006: Trends in Artificial Intelligence, LNCS 4099/2006, 2006, pp. 1155-1159.10.1007/978-3-540-36668-3_152
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. [20] H. G. Perez-Gonzalez and J.K. Kalita, “GOOAL: A Graphic Object Oriented Analysis Laboratory.” 17th annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications (OOPSLA '02), NY, USA, 2002, pp. 38-39.10.1145/985072.985092
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. [21] E.Insfrán, O.Pastor, and R.Wieringa, “Requirements Engineering-Based Conceptual Modelling.” Requir. Eng., 7, 2002 pp. 61-72.10.1007/s007660200005
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. [22] A.Hovsepyan, S.Baelen, Y.Berbers and Joosen W., “Generic Reusable Concern Compositions.” In Proceedings of the 4th European conference on Model Driven Architecture: Foundations and Applications (ECMDAFA '08), Ina Schieferdecker and Alan Hartman (Eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 231-245.10.1007/978-3-540-69100-6_16
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. [23] H.Afreen, I.S.Bajwa, B.Bordbar, “SBVR2UML: A Challenging Transformation,” fit, 2011 Frontiers of Information Technology, 2011, pp.33-38.10.1109/FIT.2011.14
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acss-2013-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8691 | Journal ISSN: 2255-8683
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 19 - 30
Published on: Jun 8, 2013
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
two-hemisphere model,
UML class diagram,
model transformation,
binary route matrix,
BrainTool
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Artificial intelligence,
Information technology,
Project management,
Software development

© 2013 Oksana Nikiforova, Konstantins Gusarovs, Olegs Gorbiks, Natalja Pavlova, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Previous articleVolume 14 (2013): Issue 1 (June 2013)Next article