Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Harmonization of International Law and National Law Systems in Ensuring a High-Level Protection of Human Rights Cover

The Harmonization of International Law and National Law Systems in Ensuring a High-Level Protection of Human Rights

By: Marius Kailius  
Open Access
|Nov 2025

References

  1. Klabbers, A Peters & G Ulfstein (eds), The Constitutionalization of International Law (2009).
  2. H. G. Cohen, ‘From Fragmentation to Constitutionalization' (2011) 24 Pacific McGeorge Global Business & Development Law Journal; UGA Legal Studies Research Paper No 11–14.
  3. Statute of the Council of Europe, 5 May 1949, 87 UNTS 103.
  4. Austria v Italy, ECmHR App No 788/60, 11 January 1961, 18, http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-115598.
  5. T. Buergenthal, ‘The Normative and Institutional Evolution of International Human Rights' (1997) 19 HRQ 703.
  6. Prosecutor v Tadić (Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction) (International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, IT-94-1-AR72, 2 October 1995).
  7. Munich Security Conference Broadened the Hybrid Concept to Include Diplomatic, Information, Military, Economic, Financial, Intelligence and Law Enforcement.
  8. Hubert D. and Weiss Th., The Responsibility to Protect: Supplementary Volume to the Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, International Development Research Centre, Canada 2001.
  9. P. Dupuy, ‘The Danger of Fragmentation or Unification of the International Legal System and the International Court of Justice' (1999) 31 NYUJILP 791, 791-792; J I Charney, ‘Is International Law Threatened by Multiple International Tribunals?' (1998) 271 RCADI 162; R Higgins, ‘Respecting Sovereign States and Running a Tight Courtroom' (2001) 50 ICLQ.
  10. K. Oellers-Frahm, ‘Multiplication of International Courts and Tribunals and Conflicting Jurisdiction – Problems and Possible Solutions' (2001) 5 Max Planck UNYB 67.
  11. A. Bradley, ‘Introduction: The need for both international and national protection of human rights – the European challenge', in S Flogaitis, T Zwart & J Fraser (eds), The European Court of Human Rights and its Discontents: Turning Criticism Into Strength (2013).
  12. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, 4 November 1950.
  13. L. Burgorgue-Larsen, ‘The Indirect Contentious Jurisdiction of the Court', in L BurgorgueLarsen & A Ubeda de Torres (eds), The Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Case Law and Commentary (2011) 25.
  14. African Charter on Human Rights and Peoples' Rights (Banjul Charter), 28 June 1981.
  15. V. Orlu Nmehielle, The African Human Rights System: Its Laws, Practice, and Institutions (2001).
  16. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3314 (XXIX), A/RES/3314, (UNGAR 3314), 14 December 1974.
  17. Hsiao A., Is China’s Policy to Use Force against Taiwan a violation of the Principle of Non-Use of Force under International Law, New England Law Review, 1998, Vol. 32.
  18. Valek P., Is Unilateral Humanitarian Intervention Compatible with the UN. Charter, Michigan Journal of International Law, 2005, vol. 26.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acpro-2025-0007 | Journal eISSN: 3044-7259 | Journal ISSN: 1691-6077
Language: English
Page range: 87 - 97
Published on: Nov 10, 2025
Published by: Turiba University Ltd
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Marius Kailius, published by Turiba University Ltd
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.