In vitro evaluation of stearylamine cationic nanoemulsions for improved ocular drug delivery

Bisera Jurišić Dukovski; Ana Bračko; Marija Šare; Ivan Pepić; Jasmina Lovrić

doi:10.2478/acph-2019-0054

References

1. S. Tamilvanan and S. Benita, The potential of lipid emulsion for ocular delivery of lipophilic drugs, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.58 (2004) 357–368; https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJPB.2004.03.03310.1016/j.ejpb.2004.03.033
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. F. Lallemand, P. Daull, S. Benita, R. Buggage and J.-S. Garrigue, Successfully improving ocular drug delivery using the cationic nanoemulsion, Novasorb, J. Drug Deliv.2012 (2012) 604204; https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/60420410.1155/2012/604204
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. L. Gan, J. Wang, M. Jiang, H. Bartlett, D. Ouyang, F. Eperjesi, J. Liu and Y. Gan, Recent advances in topical ophthalmic drug delivery with lipid-based nanocarriers, Drug Discov. Today18 (2013) 290–297; https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DRUDIS.2012.10.00510.1016/j.drudis.2012.10.005
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. C. Maïssa, M. Guillon, P. Simmons and J. Vehige, Effect of castor oil emulsion eyedrops on tear film composition and stability, Contact Lens Anterior Eye33 (2010) 76–82; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2009.10.00510.1016/j.clae.2009.10.005
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. A. Manosroi, K. Podjanasoonthon and J. Manosroi, Development of novel topical tranexamic acid liposome formulations, Int. J. Pharm.235 (2002) 61–70; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(01)00980-210.1016/S0378-5173(01)00980-2
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. S. C. de Araújo, A. C. A. de Mattos, H. F. Teixeira, P. M. Z. Coelho, D. L. Nelson and M. C. de Oliveira, Improvement of in vitro efficacy of a novel schistosomicidal drug by incorporation into nanoemulsions, Int. J. Pharm.337 (2007) 307–315; https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPHARM.2007.01.00910.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.01.009
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. M. Fraga, M. Laux, B. Zandoná, G. R. Santos, C. dos Santos Giuberti, M. C. de Oliveira, U. Matte and H. Ferreira Teixeira, Optimization of stearylamine-based nanoemulsions obtained by spontaneous emulsification process as nucleic acids delivery systems, J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol.18 (2008) 398–403; https://doi.org/10.1016/S1773-2247(08)50078-510.1016/S1773-2247(08)50078-5
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. S. H. Klang, J. Frucht-Pery, A. Hoffman and S. Benita, Physicochemical characterization and acute toxicity evaluation of a positively-charged submicron emulsion vehicle, J. Pharm. Pharmacol.46 (1994) 986–993; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1994.tb03254.x10.1111/j.2042-7158.1994.tb03254.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. I. A. Sogias, A. C. Williams and V. V Khutoryanskiy, Why is chitosan mucoadhesive?, Biomacro-molecules9 (2008) 1837–1842; https://doi.org/10.1021/bm800276d10.1021/bm800276d
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. W. T. Liau and A. M. Kasko, Poly(methyl 6-acryloyl-β-d-glucosaminoside) as a cationic glycomimetic of chitosan, Biomacromolecules18 (2017) 4133–4140; https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.7b0119110.1021/acs.biomac.7b01191
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. M. Juretić, B. Jurišić Dukovski, I. Krtalić, S. Reichl, B. Cetina-Čižmek, J. Filipović-Grčić, J. Lovrić and I. Pepić, HCE-T cell-based permeability model: A well-maintained or a highly variable barrier phenotype?, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.104 (2017) 23–30; https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJPS.2017.03.01810.1016/j.ejps.2017.03.018
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. M. Juretić, B. Cetina-Čižmek, J. Filipović-Grčić, A. Hafner, J. Lovrić and I. Pepić, Biopharmaceutical evaluation of surface active ophthalmic excipients using in vitro and ex vivo corneal models, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.120 (2018) 133–141; https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJPS.2018.04.03210.1016/j.ejps.2018.04.032
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. K. Kinnunen, A. Kauppinen, N. Piippo, A. Koistinen, E. Toropainen and K. Kaarniranta, Cationorm shows good tolerability on human HCE-2 corneal epithelial cell cultures, Exp. Eye Res.120 (2014) 82–89; https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EXER.2014.01.00610.1016/j.exer.2014.01.006
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. A. Pauly, M. Meloni, F. Brignole-Baudouin, J.-M. Warnet and C. Baudouin, Multiple endpoint analysis of the 3D-reconstituted corneal epithelium after treatment with benzalkonium chloride: Early detection of toxic damage, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.50 (2009) 1644–1652; Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.08-299210.1167/iovs.08-2992
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. I. Pereira de Sousa, C. Steiner, M. Schmutzler, M. D. Wilcox, G. J. Veldhuis, J. P. Pearson, C. W. Huck, W. Salvenmoser and A. Bernkop-Schnürch, Mucus permeating carriers: formulation and characterization of highly densely charged nanoparticles, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.97 (2015) 273–279; https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJPB.2014.12.02410.1016/j.ejpb.2014.12.024
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Y. Singh, J. G. Meher, K. Raval, F. A. Khan, M. Chaurasia, N. K. Jain and M. K. Chourasia, Nanoemulsion: Concepts, development and applications in drug delivery, J. Control. Release252 (2017) 28–49; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.03.00810.1016/j.jconrel.2017.03.008
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. V. K. Rai, N. Mishra, K. S. Yadav and N. P. Yadav, Nanoemulsion as pharmaceutical carrier for dermal and transdermal drug delivery: Formulation development, stability issues, basic considerations and applications, J. Control. Release270 (2018) 203–225; https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCONREL.2017.11.04910.1016/j.jconrel.2017.11.049
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. S. M. Đorđević, A. Santrač, N. D. Cekić, B. D. Marković, B. Divović, T. M. Ilić, M. M. Savić and S. D. Savić, Parenteral nanoemulsions of risperidone for enhanced brain delivery in acute psychosis: Physicochemical and in vivo performances, Int. J. Pharm.533 (2017) 421–430; https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPHARM.2017.05.05110.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.05.051
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. L. Gan, J. Wang, M. Jiang, H. Bartlett, D. Ouyang, F. Eperjesi, J. Liu and Y. Gan, Recent advances in topical ophthalmic drug delivery with lipid-based nanocarriers, Drug Discov. Today18 (2013) 290–297; https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DRUDIS.2012.10.00510.1016/j.drudis.2012.10.005
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. R. L. Walenga, A. H. Babiskin, X. Zhang, M. Absar, L. Zhao and R. A. Lionberger, Impact of Vehicle Physicochemical Properties on Modeling-Based Predictions of Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion Bioavailability and Tear Film Breakup Time, J. Pharm. Sci.108 (2019) 620–629; https://doi.org/10.1016/J.XPHS.2018.10.03410.1016/j.xphs.2018.10.034
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. H. Qu, J. Wang, Y. Wu, J. Zheng, Y. S. R. Krishnaiah, M. Absar, S. Choi, M. Ashraf, C. N. Cruz and X. Xu, Asymmetric flow field flow fractionation for the characterization of globule size distribution in complex formulations: A cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion case, Int. J. Pharm.538 (2018) 215–222; https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPHARM.2018.01.01210.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.01.012
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. T. J. Wooster, M. Golding and P. Sanguansri, Impact of Oil Type on Nanoemulsion Formation and Ostwald Ripening Stability, Langmuir24 (2008) 12758–12765; https://doi.org/10.1021/la801685v10.1021/la801685v
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
23. S. Uluata, E. A. Decker and D. J. McClements, Optimization of Nanoemulsion Fabrication Using Microfluidization: Role of Surfactant Concentration on Formation and Stability, Food Biophys.11 (2016) 52–59; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11483-015-9416-110.1007/s11483-015-9416-1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
24. H. D. Silva, M. A. Cerqueira and A. A. Vicente, Influence of surfactant and processing conditions in the stability of oil-in-water nanoemulsions, J. Food Eng.167 (2015) 89–98; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.07.03710.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.07.037
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
25. S. Brösel and H. Schubert, Investigations on the role of surfactants in mechanical emulsification using a high-pressure homogenizer with an orifice valve, Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif.38 (1999) 533–540; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0255-2701(99)00050-110.1016/S0255-2701(99)00050-1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
26. J.-P. Hsu and A. Nacu, Behavior of soybean oil-in-water emulsion stabilized by nonionic surfactant, J. Colloid Interface Sci.259 (2003) 374–381; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9797(02)00207-210.1016/S0021-9797(02)00207-2
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
27. J. M. Tiffany, N. Winter and G. Bliss, Tear film stability and tear surface tension, Curr. Eye Res.8 (1989) 507–515; https://doi.org/10.3109/0271368890900003110.3109/02713688909000031
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
28. B. Nagyová and J. M. Tiffany, Components responsible for the surface tension of human tears, Curr. Eye Res.19 (1999) 4–11; https://doi.org/10.1076/ceyr.19.1.4.534110.1076/ceyr.19.1.4.5341
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
29. A. Puinhas, P. Sampaio, E. M. S. Castanheira, M. E. C. D. Real Oliveira and M. Lira, Comparison of IgA, TNF-α and surface tension of the tear film in two different times of the day, Contact Lens Anterior Eye36 (2013) 140–145; https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLAE.2012.12.00510.1016/j.clae.2012.12.005
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
30. M. Hotujac Grgurević, M. Juretić, A. Hafner, J. Lovrić and I. Pepić, Tear fluid-eye drops compatibility assessment using surface tension, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm.43 (2017) 275–282; https://doi.org/10.1080/03639045.2016.123892410.1080/03639045.2016.1238924
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
31. A. Ludwig and H. Reimann, Eye BT – Practical Pharmaceutics: An International Guideline for the Preparation, Care and Use of Medicinal Products, In Y. Bouwman-Boer, V. Fenton-May, & P. Le Brun (Eds.), (pp. 163–188). Cham: Springer International Publishing; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15814-3_1010.1007/978-3-319-15814-3_10
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
32. K. A. Fitzgerald, M. Malhotra, C. M. Curtin, F. J. O’ Brien and C. M. O’ Driscoll, Life in 3D is never flat: 3D models to optimise drug delivery, J. Control. Release215 (2015) 39–54; https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCONREL.2015.07.02010.1016/j.jconrel.2015.07.020
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
33. M. Ruponen and A. Urtti, Undefined role of mucus as a barrier in ocular drug delivery, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.96 (2015) 442–446; https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJPB.2015.02.03210.1016/j.ejpb.2015.02.032
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
34. I. Pepić, J. Lovrić, B. Cetina-Čižmek, S. Reichl and J. Filipović-Grčić, Toward the practical implementation of eye-related bioavailability prediction models, Drug Discov. Today19 (2014) 31–44; https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DRUDIS.2013.08.00210.1016/j.drudis.2013.08.002
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
35. I. Krtalić, S. Radošević, A. Hafner, M. Grassi, M. Nenadić, B. Cetina-Čižmek, J. Filipović-Grčić, I. Pepić and J. Lovrić, D-Optimal Design in the Development of Rheologically Improved In Situ Forming Ophthalmic Gel, J. Pharm. Sci.107 (2018) 1562–1571; https://doi.org/10.1016/J.XPHS.2018.01.01910.1016/j.xphs.2018.01.019
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
36. J. Bassi da Silva, S. B. de S. Ferreira, O. de Freitas and M. L. Bruschi, A critical review about methodologies for the analysis of mucoadhesive properties of drug delivery systems, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm.43 (2017) 1053–1070; https://doi.org/10.1080/03639045.2017.129460010.1080/03639045.2017.1294600
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
37. E. E. Hassan and J. M. Gallo, A Simple Rheological Method for the in Vitro Assessment of Mucin-Polymer Bioadhesive Bond Strength, Pharm. Res. An Off. J. Am. Assoc. Pharm. Sci. (1990); https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101581261563510.1023/A:1015812615635
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

In vitro evaluation of stearylamine cationic nanoemulsions for improved ocular drug delivery

References

Paradigm

My account