Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparison of high-performance thin layer chromatography/UV-densitometry and UV-derivative spectrophotometry for the determination of trimetazidine in pharmaceutical formulations Cover

Comparison of high-performance thin layer chromatography/UV-densitometry and UV-derivative spectrophotometry for the determination of trimetazidine in pharmaceutical formulations

Open Access
|Jun 2019

References

  1. 1. W. C. Stanley and M. Marzilli, Metabolic therapy in the treatment of ischaemic heart disease: The pharmacology of trimetazidine, Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol.17 (2003) 133–145; https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-8206.2003.00154.x10.1046/j.1472-8206.2003.00154.x
  2. 2. P. Chrusciel, J. Rysz and M. Banach, Defining the role of trimetazidine in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders: some insights on its role in heart failure and peripheral artery disease, Drugs74 (2014) 971–980; https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-014-0233-510.1007/s40265-014-0233-5
  3. 3. European Medicines Agency, European Medicines Agency recommends restricting use of trimetazidine-containing medicines, EMA/CHMP/417861/2012; EMA, London 2012, https://www.ema.europa.eu/documents/press-release/european-medicines-agency-recommends-restricting-use-trimetazi-dine-containing-medicines_en.pdf; last access date August 31, 2018.
  4. 4. Z. Liu, J. M. Chen, H. Huang, M. Kuznicki, S. Zheng, W. Sun, N. Quan, L. Wang, H. Yang, H. M. Guo, J. Li and J. Zhuang, The protective effect of trimetazidine on myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury through activating AMPK and ERK signaling pathway, Metabolism65 (2016) 122–130; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2015.10.02210.1016/j.metabol.2015.10.022
  5. 5. A. Onay-Besikci and S. A. Özkan, Trimetazidine revisited: A comprehensive review of the pharmacological effects and analytical techniques for the determination of trimetazidine, Cardiovasc. Ther.26 (2008) 147–165; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-3466.2008.00043.x10.1111/j.1527-3466.2008.00043.x
  6. 6. T. K. Murthy, G. D. Sankar and S. R. Yarraguntla, Visible spectrophotometric methods for the determination of trimetazidine dihydrochloride in pharmaceutical formulations, Indian Drugs39 (2002) 230–233.
  7. 7. A. A. Chiş, F. G. Gligor, G. Cormoş, E. Curea and M. Bojiţă, Spectrophotometric method for the determination of amorolfine, Farmacia58 (2010) 629–636.
  8. 8. S. O. Thoppil, R. M. Cardoza and P. D. Amin, Stability indicating HPTLC determination of trimetazidine as bulk drug and in pharmaceutical formulations, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.25 (2001) 15–20; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7085(00)00440-410.1016/S0731-7085(00)00440-4
  9. 9. L. I. Bebawy, M. F. El Tarras and S. A. El Sabour, Determination of trimetazidine dihydrochloride in the presence of its acid-induced degradation products, J. AOAC Int.87 (2004) 827–833.10.1093/jaoac/87.4.827
  10. 10. M. Gackowski, M. Koba and K. Mądra-Gackowska, Determination of lormetazepam in tablets using high-performance liquid chromatography, and derivative spectrophotometry methods, J. Planar Chromatogr. - Mod. TLC31 (2018) 235–242; https://doi.org/10.1556/1006.2018.31.3.910.1556/1006.2018.31.3.9
  11. 11. M. Gackowski, M. Koba and S. Kruszewski, Comparison of UV- and derivative-spectrophotometric and HPTLC UV-densitometric methods for the determination of amrinone and milrinone in bulk drugs, Curr. Pharm. Anal.14 (2018) 1–8; https://doi.org/10.2174/157341291466618062714165910.2174/1573412914666180627141659
  12. 12. AOAC International, Guidelines for Standard Method Performance Requirements (Appendix F), AOAC Off. Methods Anal; AOAC Int. 2016, http://www.eoma.aoac.org/app_f.pdf; https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20883.89125, access date August 31, 2018.
  13. 13. P. Rashmin, P. Mrunali, D. Nitin, D. Nidhi and P. Bharat, HPTLC method development and validation: Strategy to minimize methodological failures, J. Food Drug Anal.20 (2012) 794–804; https://doi.org/10.6227/jfda.2012200408
  14. 14. M. Koba, K. Koba and T. Bączek, Determination of oxazepam in pharmaceutical formulation by HPTLC UV-densitometric and UV-derivative spectrophotometry methods, Anal. Lett.42 (2009) 1831–1843; https://doi.org/10.1080/0003271090306071910.1080/00032710903060719
  15. 15. B. Spangenberg, Does the Kubelka-Munk theory describe TLC evaluations correctly?, J. Planar Chromatogr. – Mod. TLC19 (2006) 332–341; https://doi.org/10.1556/JPC.19.2006.5.110.1556/JPC.19.2006.5.1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acph-2019-0028 | Journal eISSN: 1846-9558 | Journal ISSN: 1330-0075
Language: English
Page range: 413 - 422
Accepted on: Jan 21, 2019
|
Published on: Jun 26, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2019 Marcin Gackowski, Marcin Koba, Katarzyna Mądra-Gackowska, Stefan Kruszewski, published by Croatian Pharmaceutical Society
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.