Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effect of surface hydrophobicity of therapeutic protein loaded in polyelectrolyte nanoparticles on transepithelial permeability Cover

Effect of surface hydrophobicity of therapeutic protein loaded in polyelectrolyte nanoparticles on transepithelial permeability

Open Access
|Jul 2018

References

  1. 1. J. K. Ryu, H. S. Kim and D. H. Nam, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Engin., 17 (2012) 900-911; http://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-012-0095-110.1007/s12257-012-0095-1
  2. 2. J. Wang, V. Yadav, A. L. Smart, S. Tajiri and A. W. Basit, Toward oral delivery of biopharmaceuticals: an assessment of the gastrointestinal stability of 17 peptide drugs, Mol. Pharm. 12 (2015) 966–973; http://doi.org/10.1021/mp500809f10.1021/mp500809f
  3. 3. O. Zupančič and A. Bernkop-Schnürch, Lipophilic peptide character – What oral barriers fear the most?, J. Control. Release255 (2017) 242–257; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.04.03810.1016/j.jconrel.2017.04.038
  4. 4. K. Park, I. C. Kwan and K. Park, Oral protein delivery: current status and future prospect, React. Funct. Polym.71 (2011) 280–287; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2010.10.00210.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2010.10.002
  5. 5. D. Vllasaliu, R. Exposito-Harris, A. Heras, L. Casettari, M. Garnett, L. Illum and S. Stolnik, Tight junction modulation by chitosan nanoparticles: Comparison with chitosan solution, Int. J. Pharm. 400 (2010) 183–193; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.08.02010.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.08.020
  6. 6. G. Camenisch, J. Alsenz, H. V. Waterbeemd and G. Folkers, Estimation of permeability by passive diffusion through Caco-cell monolayers using the drugs’ lipophilicity and molecular weight, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.6 (1998) 317–324; http://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-0987(97)10019-710.1016/S0928-0987(97)10019-7
  7. 7. B. F. Choonara, Y. E. Choonara, P. Kumar, D. Bijukumar, L. C. du Toit and V. Pillay, A review of advanced oral drug delivery technologies facilitating the protection and absorption of protein and peptide molecules, Biotechnol. Adv.32 (2014) 1269–1282; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.07.00610.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.07.006
  8. 8. T. Jung, W. Kamm, A. Breitenbach, E. Kaiserling, J. X. Xiao and T. Kissel, Biodegradable nanoparticles for oral delivery of peptides: is there a role for polymers to affect mucosal uptake? Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 50 (2000) 147–160; http://doi.org/10.1016/S0939-6411(00)00084-910.1016/S0939-6411(00)00084-9
  9. 9. P. Ahlin Grabnar and J. Kristl, The manufacturing techniques of drug-loaded polymeric nanoparticles from preformed polymers, J. Microencaps. 28 (2011) 323–335; http://doi.org/10.3109/02652048.2011.56976310.3109/02652048.2011.56976321545323
  10. 10. J. Mirtič, J. Ilaš and J. Kristl, Influence of different classes of crosslinkers on alginate polyelectrolyte nanoparticle formation, thermodynamics and characteristics, Carbohydrate polymers181 (2018) 93–102; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.10.04010.1016/j.carbpol.2017.10.04029254056
  11. 11. A. T. Florence, Nanoparticle uptake by the oral route: Fulfilling its potential? Drug Discovery Today: Technologies2 (2005) 75–81; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ddtec.2005.05.01910.1016/j.ddtec.2005.05.019
  12. 12. L. Yin, J. Ding, C. He, L. Cui, C. Tang and C. Yin, Drug permeability and mucoadhesion properties of thiolated trimethyl chitosan nanoparticles in oral insulin delivery, Biomaterials30 (2009) 5691–5700; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.05510.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.055
  13. 13. Y. Li, X. Chen and N. Gu, Computational investigation of interaction between nanoparticles and membranes: Hydrophobic/hydrophilic effect, J. Phys. Chem. B.112 (2008) 16647–16653; http://doi.org/10.1021/jp805190610.1021/jp8051906
  14. 14. J. Renukuntla, A. D. Vadlapudi, A. Patel, S. H. S. Boddu and A. K. Mitra, Approaches for enhancing oral bioavailability of peptides and proteins, Int. J. Pharm.447 (2013) 75–93; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.02.03010.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.02.030
  15. 15. C. Contini, M. Schneemilch, S. Gaisford and N. Quirkedoi, Nanoparticle-membrane interactions, J. Exper. Nanosci.13 (2018) 62–81; http://doi.org/10.1080/17458080.2017.141325310.1080/17458080.2017.1413253
  16. 16. Y. Xiao, M. R. Wiesner, Characterization of surface hydrophobicity of engineered nanoparticles, J. Hazard. Mater,215–216 (2012) 146–151; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.02.04310.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.02.043
  17. 17. J. A. Patel and S. Garde, Efficient method to characterize the context-dependent hydrophobicity of proteins, Phys. Chem. B. 118 (2014) 1564–1573; http://doi.org/10.1021/jp408197710.1021/jp4081977
  18. 18. A. Hawe, M. Sutter and W. Jiskoot, Extrinsic fluorescent dyes as tools for protein characterization, Pharm. Res.25 (2008) 1487–1499; http://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-007-9516-910.1007/s11095-007-9516-9
  19. 19. D. Matulis, R. Lovrien, 1-Anilino-8-naphthalene sulfonate anion-protein binding depends primarily on ion pair formation, Biophys. J.74 (1998) 422–429; http://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77799-910.1016/S0006-3495(98)77799-9
  20. 20. B. Press and D. Di Grandi, Permeability for intestinal absorption: Caco-2 assay and related issues, Curr. Drug Metab.9 (2008) 893–900; http://doi.org/10.2174/13892000878648511910.2174/13892000878648511918991586
  21. 21. I. Hubatsch, E. G. Ragnarsson and P. Artursson, Determination of drug permeability and prediction of drug absorption in Caco-2 monolayers, Nat. Protoc. 2 (2009) 2111–2119; http://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.30310.1038/nprot.2007.303
  22. 22. K. Berginc, S. Žakelj, L. Levstik, D. Uršič and A. Kristl, Fluorescin transport properties across artificial lipid membranes, Caco-2 cell monolayers and rat jejunum, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 66 (2007) 281–285; http://doi.org/10.2016/j.ejpb.2006.10.02310.1016/j.ejpb.2006.10.023
  23. 23. M. Cegnar, B. Podobnik, S. Caserman, M. Homar and J. Kerc, EPO Compositions for Oral Administration, WO2015/032973 (A1), 12 Mar 2015.
  24. 24. M. Marušič, T. Zupančič, G. Hribar, R. Komel, G. Anderluh and S. Caserman, The Caco-2 cell culture model enables sensitive detection of enhanced protein permeability in the presence of N-decyl-ß-D-maltopyranoside, New Biotechnologies30 (2013) 507–515; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2013.05.00810.1016/j.nbt.2013.05.008
  25. 25. C. L. Cooper, P. L. Dubin, A. B. Kayitmazer and S. Turksen, Polyelectrolyte-protein complexes, Curr. Opin. Colloid. Interface Sci.10 (2005) 52–78, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2005.05.00710.1016/j.cocis.2005.05.007
  26. 26. P. Maurel, Relevance of dielectric constant and solvent hydrophobicity to the organic solvent effect in enzymology, J. Biol. Chem.253 (1978) 1671–1683.10.1016/S0021-9258(17)34918-9
  27. 27. E. Y. Chi, S. Krishnan, T. W. Randolph and J. F. Carpenter, Physical stability of proteins in aqueous solution: mechanism and driving forces in non-native protein aggregation, Pharm. Res. 20 (2003) 1325–1336; http://doi.org/10.1023/A:102577142190610.1023/A:1025771421906
  28. 28. A. M. M. Sadeghi, F. A. Dorkoosh, M. R. Avadi, M. Weinhold, A. Bayat, F. Delie, R. Gurny, B. Larijani, M. Rafiee-Tehrani and H. E. Junginger, Permeation enhancer effect of chitosan and chitosan derivatives: Comparison of formulations as soluble polymers and nanoparticulate systems on insulin absorption in Caco-2 cells, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 70 (2008) 270–278; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2008.03.004.2910.1016/j.ejpb.2008.03.004
  29. 29. M. A. Mohammed, J. T. M. Syeda, K. M. Wasan and E. K. Wasan, An overview of chitosan nanoparticles and its application in non-parenteral drug delivery, Pharmaceutics9 (2017) E53; http://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics904005310.3390/pharmaceutics9040053575065929156634
  30. 30. I. Pereira de Sousa, C. Steiner, M. Schmutzler, M. D. Wilcox, G. J. Veldhuis, J. P. Pearson, C. W. Huck, W. Salvenmoser and A. Bernkop-Schnürch, Mucus permeating carriers: formulation and characterization of highly densely charged nanoparticles, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 97 (2015) 273–279; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2014.12.02410.1016/j.ejpb.2014.12.02425576256
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acph-2018-0032 | Journal eISSN: 1846-9558 | Journal ISSN: 1330-0075
Language: English
Page range: 275 - 293
Accepted on: May 25, 2018
Published on: Jul 4, 2018
Published by: Croatian Pharmaceutical Society
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2018 Ana Miklavžin, Mateja Cegnar, Janez Kerč, Julijana Kristl, published by Croatian Pharmaceutical Society
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.