Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Ultrasound Elastography: Review of Techniques, Clinical Application, Technical Limitations, and Safety Considerations in Neonatology Cover

Ultrasound Elastography: Review of Techniques, Clinical Application, Technical Limitations, and Safety Considerations in Neonatology

By: F Schrenk,  P Uhrik and  Z Uhrikova  
Open Access
|Aug 2020

References

  1. 1. Shiina T, et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 1: basic principles and terminology. Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2015, 41.5: 1126-1147.
  2. 2. Decampo D, Hwang M. Characterizing the neonatal brain with ultrasound elastography. Pediatric neurology, 2018, 86: 19-26.
  3. 3. Gabriel M L, Piatto V B, Souza A S. Clinical application of transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in premature, very - low - birth - weight neonates. RadiolBras, 2010, 43.4: 213-8.
  4. 4. Sarvazyan A, et al. An overview of elastography - an emerging branch of medical imaging. Current Medical Imaging, 2011, 7.4: 255-282.
  5. 5. Zemanová M. Nová diagnostická zobrazovací metoda - Shear waves elastografie. Česká a Slovenská oftalmologie, 2016, 72.4: 103–110
  6. 6. Kostović I; Jovanov - Milošević N. The development of cerebral connections during the first 20–45 weeks’ gestation. In: Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. WB Saunders, 2006. p. 415-422.
  7. 7. Clouchoux C, et al. Normative fetal brain growth by quantitative in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2012, 206.2: 173. e1-173. e8.
  8. 8. Kostović I; Vasung L. Insights from in vitro fetal magnetic resonance imaging of cerebral development. In: Seminars in perinatology. WB Saunders, 2009. p. 220-233.
  9. 9. Bouyssi-Kobar M, et al. Third trimester brain growth in preterm infants compared with in utero healthy fetuses. Pediatrics, 2016, 138.5: e20161640.
  10. 10. Sigrist R, et al. Ultrasound Elastography: Review of Techniques and Clinical Applications. Theranostics [online].2017,7(5), 1303-1329 [cit. 2019-06-25]. DOI: 10.7150/thno.18650. ISSN 1838-7640.Dostupné z:http://www.thno.org/v07p1303.htm
  11. 11. Gennisson, JL, et al. Ultrasound elastography: Principles and techniques. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging [online].2013, 94(5), 487-495 [cit. 2019-06-25]. DOI: 10.1016/j.diii. 2013.01.022. ISSN 22115684.Dostupné z: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2211568413000302
  12. 12. Garra B S. Elastography: history, principles, and technique comparison. Abdominal imaging, 2015, 40.4: 680-697.
  13. 13. Itoh A, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology, 2006, 239.2: 341-350.
  14. 14. Nightingale K, et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging: in vivo demonstration of clinical feasibility. Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2002, 28.2: 227-235.
  15. 15. Catheline S, et al. Diffraction field of a low frequency vibrator in soft tissues using transient elastography. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 1999, 46.4: 1013-1019.
  16. 16. Dietrich C F, et al. Strain elastography-how to do it?.Ultrasound international open, 2017, 3.04: E137-E149.
  17. 17. Sandrin L, et al. Shear elasticity probe for soft tissues with 1-D transient elastography. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2002, 49.4: 436-446.
  18. 18. Tang A, et al. Ultrasound elastography and MR elastography for assessing liver fibrosis: part 1, principles and techniques. American journal of roentgenology, 2015, 205.1: 22-32.
  19. 19. Ferraioli G, et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 3: liver. Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2015, 41.5: 1161-1179.
  20. 20. Cosgrove D, et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 2: Clinical applications. Ultraschall in der Medizin-European Journal of Ultrasound, 2013, 34.03: 238-253.
  21. 21. Shankar H; Pagel P S. Potential Adverse Ultrasound-related Biological Effects A Critical Review. Anesthesiology: The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, 2011, 115.5: 1109-1124.
  22. 22. Su Y, et al. Evaluation of neonatal brain development using acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI). Neurophysiology, 2015, 47.4: 322-325.
  23. 23. Kim H G, et al. Ultrasound elastography of the neonatal brain: preliminary study. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2017, 36.7: 1313-1319.
  24. 24. Albayrak E; Kasap T. Evaluation of Neonatal Brain Parenchyma Using 2 Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2018, 37.4: 959-967.
  25. 25. El-Ali A M, et al. Feasibility and reproducibility of shear wave elastography in pediatric cranial ultrasound. Pediatric Radiology, 2019, 1-7.
  26. 26. Yao D, et al. Establishment and identification of a hypoxia-ischemia brain damage model in neonatal rats. Biomedical reports, 2016, 4.4: 437-443.
  27. 27. Xu Z S, et al. Evidence of changes in brain tissue stiffness after ischemic stroke derived from ultrasound based elastography. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2013, 32.3: 485-494.
  28. 28. Xu Z S, et al. Detection of mild traumatic brain injury in rodent models using shear wave elastography: preliminary studies. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2014, 33.10: 1763-1771.
  29. 29. Martín A, et al. Imaging of perfusion, angiogenesis, and tissue elasticity after stroke. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 2012, 32.8: 1496-1507.
  30. 30. Wang S-D, et al. Different extent of hypoxic-ischemic brain damage in newborn rats: histopathology, hemodynamic, virtual touch tissue quantification and neurobehavioral observation. International journal of clinical and experimental pathology,2015,8.10: 12177. 6
  31. 31. Zhu Z H, et al. Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging With Virtual Touch Tissue Quantification Enables Characterization of Mild Hypoxic Ischemic Brain Damage in Neonatal Rats. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2019, 38.7: 1797-1805.
  32. 32. Bamber J, et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: Basic principles and technology. Ultraschall in der Medizin-European Journal of Ultrasound, 2013, 34.02: 169-184.
  33. 33. Bercoff J; Tanter M; Fink M. Supersonic shear imaging: a new techniquefor soft tissue elasticity mapping. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2004, 51.4: 396-409.
  34. 34. Ertl M, et al. Transtemporal investigation of brain parenchyma elasticity using 2-D shear wave elastography: Definition of age-matched normal values. Ultrasound in medicine&biology, 2018, 44.1: 78-84.
  35. 35. WFUMB. WFUMB Clinical Safety Statement for Diagnostic Ultrasound – an overview. 2019. WFUMB Administrative Council. Retrieved from: https://wfumb.info/2019/04/15/echoes-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2/
  36. 36. BMUS. Guidelines for the safe use of diagnostic ultrasound equipment. 2010. The Safety Group of the British Medical Ultrasound Society, Ultrasound,18,
  37. 37. Sedlář M; Staffa E; Mornstein V. Zobrazovací metody využívající neionizující záření. 2013. Brno: Biofyzikální ústav Lékařské fakulty Masarykovy univerzity v Brně. Retrieved from: http://www.med.muni.cz/biofyz/zobrazovacimetody/files/zobrazovaci_metody.pdf.
  38. 38. Li C, et al. An experimental study of the potential biological effects associated with 2-D shear wave elastography on the neonatal brain. Ultrasound in medicine&biology, 2016, 42.7: 1551-1559.
  39. 39. Gumulak R, et al. Cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy in term newborns: reference values and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Acta Medica Martiniana, 2019, 19.2: 58-63.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acm-2020-0009 | Journal eISSN: 1338-4139 | Journal ISSN: 1335-8421
Language: English
Page range: 72 - 79
Submitted on: Apr 14, 2020
|
Accepted on: May 15, 2020
|
Published on: Aug 20, 2020
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2020 F Schrenk, P Uhrik, Z Uhrikova, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.