References
- Bishop, P., and Williams, L. (2012). The Temporary City. Routledge.
- Till, K. E., and McArdle, R. (2015). The Improvisional City: Valuing Urbanity beyond the Chimera of Permanence. Irish Geography, 48(1), 37–68.
- Burgers, J. (2000). Urban landscapes on public space in the post-industrial city. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 15, 145–164.
- Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Polity Press.
- Bauman, Z., and Tester, K. (2001). Conversations with Zygmunt Bauman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Urbaniak, M. (2014). Gorzki posmak płynnej nowoczesności. Wybrane zagadnienia z filozofii społecznej Zygmunta Baumana (eng.: The bitter aftertaste of liquid modernity. Selected issues from Zygmunt Bauman's social philosophy). KNUV, 42, 5–27.
- Hou, J. (2020). Guerrilla urbanism: urban design and the practices of resistance. Urban design international, 25, 117–125.
- Koolhaas, R., and Mau, B. (1995). S, M, L, XL. The Monacelli Press.
- Tschumi, B. (1994). Event-Cities. Cambridge: MIT Press Ltd.
- Rewers, E. (2005). POST-POLIS. Wstęp do filozofii ponowoczesnego miasta (eng: An introduction to the philosophy of the postmodern city). Kraków: Universitas.
- Gołębiewski, J. I. (2016). Perspektywy rewitalizacji Międzyodrza w Szczecinie przy zastosowaniu tymczasowych interwencji przestrzennych (eng.: Prospects for revitalisation of Międzyodrza in Szczecin using temporary spatial interventions.). Szczecin: Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny (eng.: Szczecin: West Pomeranian University of Technology).
- Martin, M., Hincks, S., and Deas, I. (2020). Temporary use in England's core cities: Looking beyond the exceptional. Urban Studies, 57(16), 3381–3401.
- Bosák, V., Slach, O., Nováček, A., and Krtička, L. (2020). Temporary use and brown-field regeneration in post-socialist context: From bottom-up governance to artists exploitation. European Planning Studies, 28(3), 604–626.
- O’Callaghan, C., and Lawton, P. (2015). Temporary Solutions? Vacant Space Policy and Strategies for ReUse in Dublin. Irish Geography, 48(1), 69–87.
- Lauermann, J. (2016). Temporary projects, durable outcomes: Urban development through failed Olympic bids? Urban Studies, 53(9), 1885–1901.
- Corner, J. (2006). Terra Fluxus [in:] The Landscape Urbanism Reader, Waldheim, C. [ed.], New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
- Galdini, R. (2019). Temporary uses in contemporary spaces. A European project in Rome. Cities, 96, 103–868.
- Oswalt, P., Overmeyer, K., and Misselwitz, P. (2013). Urban Catalyst: The Power of Temporary Use. Berlin: DOM publishers.
- Lehtovuori, P., and Ruoppila, S. (2012). Temporary uses as means of experimental urban planning. SAJ-Serbian Architectural Journal, 4(1), 29–54.
- Andres, L., and Kraftl, P. (2021). New directions in theorizing temporary urbanisms: Adaptability, activation, and trajectory. Progress in Human Geography, 45(5), 1237–1253.
- Chang, R. A., and Gerrits, L. (2022). What spatially stabilizes temporary use? A qualitative comparative analysis of 40 temporary use cases along synchronized stabilization trajectories. Cities, 130, 103–868.
- Andres, L. (2013). Differential spaces, power hierarchy, and collaborative planning: a critique of the role of temporary uses in shaping and making places. Urban Studies, 50(4), 759–775.
- Moore-Cherry, N., and McCarthy, L. (2016). Debating temporary uses for vacant urban sites: Insights for practice from a stakeholder workshop. Planning Practice and Research, 31(3), 347–357.
- Gorard, S. (2002). The Role of Secondary Data in Combining Methodological Approaches. Educational Review, 54(3), 231–237.
- Bednarowska, Z. (2015). Desk research – wykorzystanie potencjału danych zastanych w prowadzeniu badań marketingowych i społecznych (eng.: Desk research – harnessing the potential of foundational data in marketing and social research). Marketing i rynek (eng.: Marketing and the market), 7(2015), 18–26.
- Moore-Cherry, N. (2017). Beyond art in ‘meanwhile spaces’: Temporary parks, urban governance, and the co-production of an urban area. The impact of artists on contemporary European urban development, 207–224.
- Sasser, J. (2016). Mike Lydon and Anthony Garcia, Tactical Urbanism: Short Term Action for Long Term Change. Washington, DC: Island Press.
- Madsen, K. (2010). Kragh and Berglund. A+t. Vitoria-Gasteiz, 80–91.
- Kamvasinou, K. (2017). Short Term Projects, Long Term Ambitions: Facets of Transience in Two London Development Sites. Transience and Permanence in Urban Development, 65–83.
- Samson, K. (2015). Aesthetic Performativity in Urban Design and Art. Engaging Spaces: Sites of Performance, Interaction, and Reflection, 292.
- Deboosere, B., De Raeve, W., and Miessen, M. (2016). On Tempelhofer Feld. Spector Books.
- Roskamm, N. (2013). 4,000,000 m2 of Public Space: The Berlin “Tempelhofer Feld” and a Short Walk with Lefebvre and Laclau. In Public Space and the Challenges of Urban Transformation in Europe (pp. 63–77). Routledge.
- St Hill, C. (2019). This is Temporary: how transient projects are redefining architecture. Routledge.
- Ataman, C., and Tuncer, B. (2022). Urban interventions and participation tools in urban design processes: a systematic review and thematic analysis (1995–2021). Sustainable Cities and Society, 76, 103–462.
- Mackrodt, U. (2015). Cui bono? Die Pioniernutzungen auf dem Tempelhofer Feld in Berlin zwischen Partizipation, Stadtmarketing und Protest. Städtische Planungskulturen im Spiegel von Konflikten, Protesten und Initiativen, 277–302.
- SenStadt (Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung Berlin) (2010). Zwischen und Pioniernutzungen im Tempelhofer Park. Berlin.
- Team Ideenwerkstatt Berlin (2008). Dokumentation Expertenkonferenz am 29. und 30. November 2007 im Flughafen Berlin-Tempelhof. Berlin.
- Huber, E. E. (2021). Wir schenken der Welt das Tempelhofer Feld. Praxismanual Situationsansatz: Ein Bildungskonzept für Pädagogik, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 295–323.
- Leonhard, S. (2016). Das Tempelhofer Feld-Partizipationsprozess und Bewertung der Nachnutzungskonzepte (Doctoral dissertation, Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Berlin).
- Roskamm, N., and Karge, T. (2010). Grand opening Tempelhofer Feld. Berlin: Universitätsverlag der Technischen Universität Berlin.
- Schönball, R. (2012). Tempelhofer Feld. Brennpunkt der Gentrifizierung. Der Tagesspiegel, 30.10.2012.
- Dehne, M. (2015). Soziologie der Angst. Konzeptuelle Grundlagen, soziale Bedingungen und empirische Analysen, Wiesbaden, Springer Fachmedien.
- Colomb, C. (2012). Pushing the urban frontier: Temporary uses of space, city marketing, and the creative city discourse in 2000s Berlin. Journal of Urban Affairs, 34(2), 131–152.
- Chen, L., and Conroy, M. M. (2023). Vacant urban land temporary use and neighborhood sustainability: A comparative study of two Midwestern cities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 1–25.
- Fabian, L., and Samson, K. (2016). Claiming participation–a comparative analysis of DIY urbanism in Denmark. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 9(2), 166–184.
- Römer, A., and Aït Sidhoum, N. (2013). Low Tech Transgression: The Interventional Work of EXYZT. Architectural Design, 83(6), 66–69.
- Suau, C., Davidson, R., and Lascelles, M. (2011). DIY: Do It Yourself. In The Union Street Urban Orchard: A Case Study of Creative Interim Use.
- Stevens, Q. (2018). Temporary uses of urban spaces: How are they understood as “creative”? Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 12(3), 90.
- Priemus, H. (2004). The path to successful urban renewal: Current policy debates in the Netherlands. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19, 199–209.
- Pratt, A. C., and Hutton, T. A. (2013). Reconceptualizing the Relationship between the Creative Economy and the City: Learning from the Financial Crisis. Cities, 33, 86–95.
- Ferreri, M. (2015). The seductions of temporary urbanism. Ephemera, 15(1), 181–191.
- Bragaglia, F., and Rossignolo, C. (2021). Temporary urbanism as a new policy strategy: a contemporary panacea or a trojan horse? International planning studies, 26(4), 370–386.
- Sandler, D. (2020). Correction to: Grassroots urbanism in contemporary São Paulo. Urban Design International, 25, 137–151.
- Madanipour, A. (2018). Temporary use of space: Urban processes between flexibility, opportunity, and precarity. Urban Studies, 55(5), 1093–1110.
- Kamvasinou, K. (2017). Temporary intervention and long term legacy: lessons from London case studies. Journal of Urban Design, 22(2), 187–207.
- Schultz, M., and Hernes, T. (2020). The temporal interplay between strategy and identity: Punctuated, subsumed, and sustained modes. Strategic Organization, 18(1), 106–135.