Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Mental Visualization As Social Practice: Repertoires, Material Mediation, And Micro-Temporality Cover

Mental Visualization As Social Practice: Repertoires, Material Mediation, And Micro-Temporality

Open Access
|Mar 2026

References

  1. Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. University of California Press. ISBN 978-05-200-1871-6.
  2. Association of College and Research Libraries. (2012). Visual literacy competency standards for higher education: Approved by the ACRL Board of Directors, October 2011. College & Research Libraries News, 73(2), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.73.2.8709
  3. BERA. (2024). Ethical guidelines for educational research (5th ed.). British Educational Research Association. https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-fifth-edition-2024-online
  4. Binali, T., Chang, C.-H., Chang, Y.-J., & Chang, H.-Y. (2024). High School and College Students’ Graph-Interpretation Competence in Scientific and Daily Contexts of Data Visualization. Science & Education, 33, 763–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00406-3
  5. Börner, K., Bueckle, A., & Ginda, M. (2019). Data visualization literacy: Definitions, conceptual frameworks, exercises, and assessments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences – PNAS, 116(6), 1857–1864. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807180116
  6. Boy, J., Rensink, R. A., Bertini, E., & Fekete, J.-D. (2014). A Principled Way of Assessing Visualization Literacy. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 20(12), 1963–1972. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346984
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage. ISBN 978-14-739-5324-6. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/thematic-analysis/book248481
  8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
  9. Brockbank, E., Verma, A., Lloyd, H., Huey, H., Padilla, L., & Fan, J. E. (2025). Evaluating convergence between two data visualization literacy assessments. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 10, article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-025-00622-9
  10. Fiorella, L., & Zhang, Q. (2018). Drawing Boundary Conditions for Learning by Drawing. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 1115–1137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9444-8
  11. Fransecky, R. B., & Debes, J. L. (1972). Visual Literacy: A Way to Learn — A Way to Teach. Association for Educational Communications and Technology. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED064884.pdf
  12. Fukuda, K., & Woodman, G. F. (2017). Visual working memory buffers information retrieved from visual long-term memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences – PNAS, 114(20), 5306–5311. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1617874114
  13. Ge, L. W., Cui, Y., & Kay, M. (2023). CALVI: Critical Thinking Assessment for Literacy in Visualizations. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’ 23). (pp. 1–18). Association for Computing Machinery – ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581406
  14. Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419109534381
  15. Hetland, L., Winner, E., Veenema, S., & Sheridan, K. M. (2013). Studio Thinking 2: The Real Benefits of Visual Arts Education (2nd ed.). Teachers College. ISBN 978-0-8077-5435-1.
  16. Jin, F., Hsu, S.-M., & Li, Y. (2024). A Systematic Review of Aphantasia: Concept, Measurement, Neural Basis, and Theory Development. Vision, 8(3), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision8030056
  17. Kirsh, D. (2010). Thinking with external representations. AI & Society, 25, 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-010-0272-8
  18. Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image And Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate. The MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-61124-4.
  19. Paivio, A. (2014). Intelligence, dual coding theory, and the brain. Intelligence, 47, 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.09.002
  20. Pandey, S., & Ottley, A. (2023). Mini-VLAT: A Short and Effective Measure of Visualization Literacy. Computer Graphics Forum, 42(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14809
  21. Pearson, J. (2019). The human imagination: the cognitive neuroscience of visual mental imagery. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 20, 624–634. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-019-0202-9
  22. Schön, D. A. (1992). Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Research in Engineering Design, 3, 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580516
  23. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-57629-2. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acc-2026-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2571-0613 | Journal ISSN: 1803-9782
Language: English
Page range: 35 - 49
Published on: Mar 10, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2026 Tereza Vlasáková, published by Technical University of Liberec
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.