Erving Goffman’s Enduring Legacy in Social Interaction Studies

Kuznetsov, Michael Yuryevich

doi:10.2478/acc-2025-0017

Abstract

Erving Goffman (1922-1982) significantly shaped modern sociology through his contributions to microsociology, particularly his theories of symbolic interactionism and dramaturgical analysis. This article examines Goffman’s theoretical frameworks, with a particular emphasis on his dramaturgical analysis, which likens social interactions to theatrical performances, and his frame analysis, which investigates how individuals construct and interpret social realities. The research is based on a qualitative analysis and key scholarly interpretations (comparative, textual, and conceptual). Drawing from the Chicago School of Sociology, Goffman’s work integrates insights from Max Weber and George Herbert Mead to analyze how individuals navigate social roles, stigmas, and institutional structures.

References

Bacon, F. (1977). Works in two volumes (Vol. 1) (2^nd ed.). Moscow: Mysl’. https://imwerden.de/pdf/bekon_tom1_1977_text.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bacon, F. (1978). Works in two volumes (Vol. 2) (2^nd ed.). Moscow: Mysl’. https://imwerden.de/pdf/bekon_tom2_1978_text.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bakhtin, M. M. (2009). Rabelais and His World. Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0-253-20341-0.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-03905-3.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Batygin, G. S. (2001). Continuum of Frames: Irving Goffman’s Dramaturgical Realism. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriia: Sotsiologiia, 2001(2), 5–24. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kontinuum-freymov-dramaturgicheskiy-realizmirvinga-gofmana
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Prentice-Hall. ISBN 978-0138799243.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Burns, T. (1991). Erving Goffman. Routledge. ISBN 9780415067720.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dante, A. (1932). Vita Nova (M. Barbi Ed.). Bemporad, Firenze. https://skypescuola.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/dante-alighieri-vita-nova.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Durkheim, É. (1997). Suicide: A Study in Sociology. The Free Press. ISBN 0-684-83632-7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Vintage. ISBN 0-385-09402-7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Pantheon Books. ISBN 0-394-70631-5.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Goffman, E. (1969). Strategic Interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN 978-0-8122-1011-8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harper & Row. ISBN 978-0060903725.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN 0-8122-7790-2.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Goffman, E. (1986). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-0671622442.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Goffman, E. (2007). Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-0-202-30971-2.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gran, A.-B. (2025). Performing Not-Not-Me in SoMe: A New Theatrical Typology of Self-Presentation Online. Social Media + Society, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251315256
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Guise, A. (2024). Stigma power in practice: Exploring the contribution of Bourdieu’s theory to stigma, discrimination and health research. Social Science & Medicine, 347, Article 116774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116774
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Inglis, D., & Thorpe, C. (2023). Beyond the “inimitable” Goffman: from “social theory” to social theorizing in a Goffmanesque manner. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, Article 1171087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1171087
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lenin, V. I. (2022). Materialism and Empirio-Criticism. Paris: Foreign Languages Press. ISBN 978-2-493844-36-1. https://foreignlanguages.press/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/C41-Empiriocriticism-Lenin-2nd-Printing-FINAL-1.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lippmann, W. (1998). Public Opinion (2^nd ed.). Transaction Publishers. ISBN 1-56000-999-3. https://monoskop.org/images/b/bf/Lippman_Walter_Public_Opinion.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Luhmann, N. (1996). Social Systems. Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0804726252.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lukács, G. (1968). History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Hermann Luchterhand Verlag. ISBN 0-262-62020-0. https://monoskop.org/images/3/3b/Lukacs_Georg_History_and_Class_Consciousness_Studies_in_Marxist_Dialectics.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Marx, K. (1977). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 1. Vintage. ISBN 0-394-72657-X.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mead, G. H. (1967). Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. The University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0226516684.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social Theory and Social Structure. Free Press. ISBN 978-0029211304.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Parsons, T. (1964). The Social System. The Free Press/Macmillan. ISBN 978-0029241905.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Plekhanov, G. V. (1938). On the Development of the Monistic View of History. Moscow: State Publishing House of Political Literature. https://library.udpu.edu.ua/library_files/rarutetu/1/8.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ricoeur, P. (1990). Time and Narrative, (Vol. 3). University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-71336-6.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rogozin, D. M. (2005). Irving Goffman’s Anti-Phenomenological Project. Yuzhno-rossiiskii zhurnal sotsial’nykh nauk, 2005(3), 41–50. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/antifenomenologicheskiy-proekt-irvinga-gofmana
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Scheff, T. J. (2006). Goffman Unbound! A New Paradigm for Social Science. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-59451-196-7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shalin, D. N. (2023). Erving Goffman: The Social Science Maverick. Assessing the Interdisciplinary Impact of the Most Cited American Sociologist. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 52(6), 752–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912416231190911
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Smith, G. (2022). Fiction in Goffman. The Sociological Review, 70(4), 711–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261221109029
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Spencer, H. (2004). The Principles of Sociology, (Vol. 1). University Press of the Pacific. ISBN 978-1410211842.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ukhtomsky, A. A. (2019). Dominant. St. Petersburg: Piter. ISBN 978-5-4461-1183-1.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vahstein, V. S. (2003). Irving Goffman’s Dramaturgical Theory: Two Readings. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie, 3(4), 104–118. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/dramaturgicheskaya-teoriya-irvinga-gofmana-dvaprochteniya
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vahstein, V. S. (2007). In Memory of Irving Goffman. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie, 6(2), 65–78. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pamyati-irvinga-gofmana-1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Weber, M. (2001). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-25406-9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yadow, V. A. (2011). An Attempt to Rethink Irving Goffman’s Concept of Frames. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noi antropologii, 14(2), 85–97. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/popytka-pereosmyslit-kontseptsiyu-freymov-irvingagofmana
Search in Google Scholar Back to article