Abstract
Osteoblastoma and osteoid osteoma are rare benign bone tumours, sometimes considered variations of the same pathologic process. However, they differ in location, incidence, age group, and size. The gold standard treatment is surgical excision for osteoblastoma and radiofrequency ablation for both. Minimally invasive techniques, including radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablations, cryoablation, ultrasound ablation, and laser ablation, are increasingly used. This meta-analysis aimed to review current treatments, focusing on minimally invasive methods versus traditional surgical excision. A data comparison of 17 original articles from the PubMed database (2014-2024) was conducted, examining treatment methods, patient numbers, success rates, pre/post-operative pain scores, and complication rates. New ablation methods achieve similar clinical results to traditional surgery for treating osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma while minimizing invasiveness. Most procedures have technical success rates near 100%. Both invasive and non-invasive methods significantly reduce preoperative pain. Classical surgery has higher minor complication rates compared to minimally invasive treatments. Among ablation techniques, magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound surgery is the least invasive, avoiding radiation and antibiotic-related complications. However, in ablation methods caution is needed to prevent thermal damage to nearby joints and nerves. Protective methods, such as skin protection, hydrodissection, gas dissection, and intraoperative neurostimulation, are recommended. New ablation methods provide less invasive alternatives to surgery, with high clinical and technical success rates and lower complication rates. Among these, magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound surgery is the least invasive and most promising, though more clinical data is needed due to its recent development.