Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Drosophila melanogaster research: history, breakthrough and perspectives Cover

Drosophila melanogaster research: history, breakthrough and perspectives

Open Access
|Jan 2019

References

  1. 1. Jennings BH. Drosophila-a versatile model in biology & medicine. Mater Today. 2011;14:190–5; DOI:10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70113-4.10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70113-4
  2. 2. Nagel J. Getting started. Lect. Notes Energy. Humana Press. 2008;69:231–56; DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-96355-6_5.10.1007/978-3-319-96355-6_5
  3. 3. Arbeitman MN, Furlong EEM, Imam F, Johnson E, Null BH, Baker BS, Krasnow MA, Scott MP, Davis RW, White KP. Gene expression during the life cycle of Drosophila melanogaster. Science (80- ). 2002;297:2270–5; DOI:10.1126/science.1072152.10.1126/science.1072152
  4. 4. Bull AL. Bicaudal, a genetic factor which affects the polarity of the embryo inDrosophila melanogaster. J Exp Zool. 1966;161:221–41; DOI:10.1002/jez.1401610207.10.1002/jez.1401610207
  5. 5. Schüpbach T, Wieschaus E. Maternal-effect mutations altering the anterior-posterior pattern of the Drosophila embryo. Roux's Arch Dev Biol. 1986;195:302–17; DOI:10.1007/BF00376063.10.1007/BF00376063
  6. 6. Arthur LL, Chung JJ, Janakirama P, Keefer KM, Kolotilin I, Pavlovic-Djuranovic S, Chalker DL, Grbic V, Green R, Menassa R, True HL, Skeath JB, Djuranovic S. Corrigendum: Rapid generation of hypomorphic mutations. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14705; DOI:10.1038/ncomms14705.10.1038/ncomms14705
  7. 7. Nüsslein-Volhard C. Genetic analysis of pattern-formation in the embryo of Drosophila melanogaster - Characterization of the maternal-effect mutant Bicaudal. Wilhelm Roux's Arch Dev Biol. 1977;183:249–68; DOI:10.1007/BF00867325.10.1007/BF00867325
  8. 8. Sega GA. A review of the genetic effects of ethyl methanesulfonate. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol. 1984;134:113–42; DOI:10.1016/0165-1110(84)90007-1.10.1016/0165-1110(84)90007-1
  9. 9. Hoy MA. Genetic Systems, Genome Evolution, and Genetic Control of Embryonic Development in Insects. Insect Mol. Genet., Academic Press. 2013;103–79; DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-415874-0.00004-4.10.1016/B978-0-12-415874-0.00004-4
  10. 10. Nüsslein-Volhard C, Wieschaus E. Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature. 1980;287:795–801; DOI:10.1038/287795a0.10.1038/287795a0
  11. 11. Ingham P, Gergen P. Interactions between the pair-rule genes runt, hairy, even-skipped and fushi tarazu and the establishment of periodic pattern in the Drosophila embryo. Development. 1988;104.10.1242/dev.104.Supplement.51
  12. 12. Martinez-Arias A, Lawrence PA. Parasegments and compartments in the Drosophila embryo. Nature. 1985;313:639–42; DOI:10.1038/313639a0.10.1038/313639a0
  13. 13. Martinez Arias A, Baker NE, Ingham PW. Role of segment polarity genes in the definition and maintenance of cell states in the Drosophila embryo. Development. 1988;103.10.1242/dev.103.1.157
  14. 14. Driever W, Nüsslein-Volhard C. A gradient of bicoid protein in Drosophila embryos. Cell. 1988;54:83–93.10.1016/0092-8674(88)90182-1
  15. 15. Driever W, Nüsslein-Volhard C. The bicoid protein determines position in the Drosophila embryo in a concentration-dependent manner. Cell. 1988;54:95–104.10.1016/0092-8674(88)90183-3
  16. 16. Nüsslein-Volhard C, Dham R. Zebrafish: A practical approach. New York Oxford Univ Press. 2002; DOI:10.1017/S0016672303216384.10.1017/S0016672303216384
  17. 17. Mullins MC, Hammerschmidt M, Haffter P, Nüsslein-Volhard C. Large-scale mutagenesis in the zebrafish: in search of genes controlling development in a vertebrate. Curr Biol. 1994;4:189–202.10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00048-8
  18. 18. Bergantiños C, Vilana X, Corominas M, Serras F. Imaginal discs: Renaissance of a model for regenerative biology. BioEssays. 2010;32:207–17; DOI:10.1002/bies.200900105.10.1002/bies.200900105
  19. 19. Bell AJ, McBride SMJ, Dockendorff TC. Flies as the ointment: Drosophila modeling to enhance drug discovery. Fly (Austin). 2009;3:39–49; DOI:10.4161/fly.3.1.7774.10.4161/fly.3.1.7774
  20. 20. Giacomotto J, Ségalat L. High-throughput screening and small animal models, where are we? Br J Pharmacol. 2010;160:204–16; DOI:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00725.x.10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00725.x
Language: English
Page range: 182 - 185
Submitted on: Nov 7, 2018
Accepted on: Nov 28, 2018
Published on: Jan 3, 2019
Published by: Foundation for Cell Biology and Molecular Biology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Małgorzata Popis, Blanka Borowiec, Maurycy Jankowski, published by Foundation for Cell Biology and Molecular Biology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.