Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Response to abiotic and organic substances stimulation belongs to ontologic groups significantly up-regulated in porcine immature oocytes Cover

Response to abiotic and organic substances stimulation belongs to ontologic groups significantly up-regulated in porcine immature oocytes

Open Access
|Dec 2018

References

  1. 1. Mermillod P, Oussaid B, Cognié Y. Aspects of follicular and oocyte maturation that affect the developmental potential of embryos. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1999;54:449–60.
  2. 2. Yang MY, Rajamahendran R. Expression of Bcl-2 and Bax proteins in relation to quality of bovine oocytes and embryos produced in vitro. Anim Reprod Sci. 2002;70(3–4):159–69.10.1016/S0378-4320(01)00186-5
  3. 3. Hyttel P, Fair T, Callesen H, Greve T. Oocyte growth, capacitation and final maturation in cattle. Theriogenology. 1997;47(1):23–32; DOI:10.1016/S0093-691X(96)00336-6.10.1016/S0093-691X(96)00336-6
  4. 4. Bachvarova R, De Leon V, Johnson A, Kaplan G, Paynton B V. Changes in total RNA, polyadenylated RNA, and actin mRNA during meiotic maturation of mouse oocytes. Dev Biol. 1985;108(2):325–31.10.1016/0012-1606(85)90036-3
  5. 5. Humblot P, Holm P, Lonergan P, Wrenzycki C, Lequarré A-S, Joly CG, et al. Effect of stage of follicular growth during superovulation on developmental competence of bovine oocytes. Theriogenology. 2005;63(4):1149–66; DOI:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.06.002.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.06.002
  6. 6. Hashimoto N, Kishimoto T. Regulation of meiotic metaphase by a cytoplasmic maturation-promoting factor during mouse oocyte maturation. Dev Biol. 1988;126(2):242–52.10.1016/0012-1606(88)90135-2
  7. 7. Kishimoto T, Kuriyama R, Kondo H, Kanatani H. Generality of the action of various maturation-promoting factors. Exp Cell Res. 1982;137(1):121–6; DOI:10.1016/0014-4827(82)90014-3.10.1016/0014-4827(82)90014-3
  8. 8. Abeydeera LR. In vitro production of embryos in swine. Theriogenology. 2002;57(1):256–73.10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00670-7
  9. 9. Zhang W, Yi K, Yan H, Zhou X. Advances on in vitro production and cryopreservation of porcine embryos. Anim Reprod Sci. 2012;132(3–4):115–22; DOI:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.05.008.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.05.00822698497
  10. 10. Kątska-Książkiewicz Lucyna. Pig embryo production by in vitro maturation and fertilization of ovarian oocytes. A review. J Anim Feed Sci. 2006;15(4):525–42.10.22358/jafs/66923/2006
  11. 11. Ożegowska K, Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska M, Celichowski P, Nawrocki MJ, Bryja A, Jankowski M, et al. Expression pattern of new genes regulating female sex differentiation and in vitro maturational status of oocytes in pigs. Theriogenology. 2018;121:122–33; DOI:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.08.019.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.08.01930145542
  12. 12. Al-aghbari AM, Menino AR. Survival of oocytes recovered from vitrified sheep ovarian tissues. Anim Reprod Sci. 2002;71(1–2):101–10.10.1016/S0378-4320(02)00011-8
  13. 13. Nascimento A, Albornoz M, Che L, Visintin J, Bordignon V. Synergistic Effect of Porcine Follicular Fluid and Dibutyryl Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate on Development of Parthenogenetically Activated Oocytes from Pre-Pubertal Gilts. Reprod Domest Anim. 2009;45(5):851–9; DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0531.2009.01368.x.10.1111/j.1439-0531.2009.01368.x
  14. 14. Le Guienne B. Small atlas of bovine oocyte. Atlas Bov Oocyte. 1998;288(1):24–30.
  15. 15. Pujol M, López-Béjar M, Paramio M-T. Developmental competence of heifer oocytes selected using the brilliant cresyl blue (BCB) test. Theriogenology. 2004;61(4):735–44; DOI:10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00250-4.10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00250-4
  16. 16. Ericsson SA, Boice ML, Funahashi H, Day BN. Assessment of porcine oocytes using brilliant cresyl blue. Theriogenology. 1993;39(1):214; DOI:10.1016/0093-691X(93)90069-H.10.1016/0093-691X(93)90069-H
  17. 17. Budna J, Celichowski P, Bryja A, Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska M, Jeseta M, Bukowska D, Antosik P, Brüssow KP, Bruska M, Nowicki M, Zabel M, Kempisty B. Significant Down-Regulation of “Biological Adhesion” Genes in Porcine Oocytes after IVM. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(12):2685; DOI:10.3390/ijms18122685.10.3390/ijms18122685575128729232894
  18. 18. Budna J, Bryja A, Celichowski P, Kranc W, Ciesiółka S, Borys S, Rybska M, Kolecka-Bednarczyk A, Jeseta M, Bukowska D, Antosik P, Brüssow KP, Bruska M, Nowicki M, Zabel M, Kempisty B. “Bone Development” Is an Ontology Group Upregulated in Porcine Oocytes Before In Vitro Maturation: A Microarray Approach. DNA Cell Biol. 2017;36(8):638–46; DOI:10.1089/dna.2017.36710.1089/dna.2017.3677
  19. 19. Walter W, Sánchez-Cabo F, Ricote M. GOplot: an R package for visually combining expression data with functional analysis: Fig. 1. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(17):2912–4; DOI:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv300.10.1093/bioinformatics/btv30025964631
  20. 20. De Bock M, Kerrebrouck M, Wang N, Leybaert L. Neurological manifestations of oculodentodigital dysplasia: a Cx43 channelopathy of the central nervous system? Front Pharmacol. 2013;4:120; DOI:10.3389/fphar.2013.00120.10.3389/fphar.2013.00120378384024133447
  21. 21. Richard S, Baltz JM. Prophase I Arrest of Mouse Oocytes Mediated by Natriuretic Peptide Precursor C Requires GJA1 (connexin-43) and GJA4 (connexin-37) Gap Junctions in the Antral Follicle and Cumulus-Oocyte Complex1. Biol Reprod. 2014;90(6):137; DOI:10.1095/biolreprod.114.118505.10.1095/biolreprod.114.11850524804968
  22. 22. Li SH, Lin MH, Hwu YM, Lu CH, Yeh LY, Chen YJ, et al. Correlation of cumulus gene expression of GJA1, PRSS35, PTX3, and SERPINE2 with oocyte maturation, fertilization, and embryo development. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13(1); DOI:10.1186/s12958-015-0091-3.10.1186/s12958-015-0091-3453756626276571
  23. 23. Guinea-Viniegra J, Zenz R, Scheuch H, Jiménez M, Bakiri L, Petzelbauer P, et al. Differentiation-induced skin cancer suppression by FOS, p53, and TACE/ADAM17. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(8):2898–910; DOI:10.1172/JCI63103.10.1172/JCI63103340874522772468
  24. 24. Spiegelman BM, Distel RJ, Ro H-S, Rosen BS, Satterberg B. Mini-Review fos Protooncogene and the Regulation of Gene Expression in Adipocyte Differentiation. n.d.
  25. 25. Zhou H, Gao J, Lu ZY, Lu L, Dai W, Xu M. Role of c-Fos/JunD in protecting stress-induced cell death. Cell Prolif. 2007;40(3):431–44; DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2184.2007.00444.x.10.1111/j.1365-2184.2007.00444.x
  26. 26. Schlesinger TK, Bonvin C, Jarpe MB, Fanger GR, Cardinaux J-R, Johnson GL, et al. Apoptosis stimulated by the 91-kDa caspase cleavage MEKK1 fragment requires translocation to soluble cellular compartments. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(12):10283–91; DOI:10.1074/jbc.M106885200.10.1074/jbc.M106885200
  27. 27. Kranc W, Budna J, Chachuła A, Borys S, Bryja A, Rybska M, et al. “Cell Migration” Is the Ontology Group Differentially Expressed in Porcine Oocytes Before and After In Vitro Maturation: A Microarray Approach. DNA Cell Biol. 2017;36(4):273–82; DOI:10.1089/dna.2016.3425.10.1089/dna.2016.3425
  28. 28. De Miguel MP, Cheng L, Holland EC, Federspiel MJ, Donovan PJ. Dissection of the c-Kit signaling pathway in mouse primordial germ cells by retroviral-mediated gene transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(16):10458–63; DOI:10.1073/pnas.122249399.10.1073/pnas.122249399
  29. 29. Driancourt MA, Reynaud K, Cortvrindt R, Smitz J. Roles of KIT and KIT LIGAND in ovarian function. Rev Reprod. 2000;5(3):143–52.10.1530/ror.0.0050143
  30. 30. Curry TE, Osteen KG. Cyclic Changes in the Matrix Metalloproteinase System in the Ovary and Uterus1. Biol Reprod. 2001;64(5):1285–96; DOI:10.1095/biolreprod64.5.1285.10.1095/biolreprod64.5.1285
  31. 31. Joyce IM, Pendola FL, Wigglesworth K, Eppig JJ. Oocyte Regulation of Kit Ligand Expression in Mouse Ovarian Follicles. Dev Biol. 1999;214(2):342–53; DOI:10.1006/DBIO.1999.9437.10.1006/dbio.1999.9437
  32. 32. Ikegawa S, Nakamura Y. Structure of the gene encoding human colligin-2 (CBP2). Gene. 1997;194(2):301–3.10.1016/S0378-1119(97)00209-6
  33. 33. Hammond SM, Altshuller YM, Sung TC, Rudge SA, Rose K, Engebrecht J, et al. Human ADP-ribosylation factor-activated phosphatidylcholine-specific phospholipase D defines a new and highly conserved gene family. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(50):29640–3.10.1074/jbc.270.50.296408530346
Language: English
Page range: 91 - 100
Submitted on: Sep 25, 2018
Accepted on: Oct 27, 2018
Published on: Dec 24, 2018
Published by: Foundation for Cell Biology and Molecular Biology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2018 Wiesława Kranc, Maciej Brązert, Katarzyna Ożegowska, Joanna Budna-Tukan, Piotr Celichowski, Maurycy Jankowski, Artur Bryja, Mariusz J. Nawrocki, Małgorzata Popis, Michal Jeseta, Leszek Pawelczyk, Mariusz Skowroński, Paweł Antosik, Dorota Bukowska, Małgorzata Bruska, Michał Nowicki, Maciej Zabel, Bartosz Kempisty, published by Foundation for Cell Biology and Molecular Biology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.