Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Correlations between serum acute-phase protein SAA, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis Cover

Correlations between serum acute-phase protein SAA, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis

By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Aug 2026
Read online

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of AS patients by BASDAI activity group

GroupNAge (years)Weight (kg)CRP (mg/L)ESR (mm/h)PLRSAA (mg/L)BASDAI
Low6034.5 (26.8–44.2)66 ± 8.77.4 (4.7–16.3)12 (10–16)102.7 ± 22.214.3 (11.7–17.2)2.8 (2.1–3.1)
Moderate5042 (35.2–47.8)69 (63–80)16.1 (12.1–21.2)24.5 (21–30)138.4 ± 27.629 ± 8.24.7 ± 0.4
High5045.5 (36.2–51.8)73.4 ± 1422 (13.8–31.8)40.5 (31–49)164.5 ± 29.248.3 ± 9.16.8 (6.5–7.4)

[i] AS, ankylosing spondylitis, BASDAI, bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index; CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; PLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; SAA, serum amyloid A.

Figure 1.

Distribution of SAA and PLR. (A) SAA; (B) PLR levels across different disease activity groups. Box plots display medians (horizontal lines), IQR (boxes), and 1.5 × IQR whiskers. Group comparisons were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis H test, with post hoc Dunn–Bonferroni tests for significant PLR differences: low- vs. high-activity (P < 0.0001), moderate- vs. high-activity (P < 0.0001), and low- vs. moderate-activity (∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001). IQR, interquartile range; PLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; SAA, serum amyloid A.

Figure 2.

Correlation of SAA, PLR and BASDAI scores. (A) SAA and BASDAI; (B) PLR and BASDAI, and (C) SAA and PLR. Both SAA and PLR showed strong correlations with BASDAI, while SAA and PLR exhibited a moderate correlation. r: correlation coefficient; P < 0.001 for all. BASDAI, bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index; PLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; SAA, serum amyloid A.

Table 2.

ROC curve analysis of diagnostic performance

Cut-off valueSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)AUC
SAA ≥30.6 mg/L96.080.00.93
PLR ≥143.778.076.40.86
Combined detection86.090.90.95

[i] AUC, area under the curve; PLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; SAA, serum amyloid A.

Figure 3.

ROC curve analysis of SAA, PLR, and their combination for predicting high disease activity. (A) AUC comparison between SAA and PLR; (B) sensitivity/specificity of SAA; (C) sensitivity/specificity of PLR; (D) sensitivity/specificity of combined SAA + PLR. AUC, area under the curve; combination, SAA + PLR; PLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; SAA, serum amyloid A.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/abm-2026-0027 | Journal eISSN: 1875-855X | Journal ISSN: 1905-7415
Language: English
Page range: 240 - 247
Published on: Aug 31, 2026
Published by: Chulalongkorn University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 NingNing Yu, TaiZhe Wang, ZhiGang Liu, published by Chulalongkorn University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.