Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetic study of antituberculosis treatment in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis Cover

Clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetic study of antituberculosis treatment in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis

Open Access
|Jun 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Design flowchart. CL, clearance rate.

Comparison of key PK parameters between the 2 groups (x̄ ± s)

ParameterHRZE
Cmax (µg/mL)
Control group (n = 45)5.6 ± 0.912.5 ± 1.825.7 ± 4.35.4 ± 0.8
Study group (n = 45)8.9 ± 1.5**16.8 ± 2.4**38.5 ± 5.6**8.2 ± 1.1**
Cmin (µg/mL)
Control group (n = 45)0.6 ± 0.21.2 ± 0.39.3 ± 1.70.4 ± 0.1
Study group (n = 45)1.5 ± 0.4**2.8 ± 0.6**12.8 ± 2.1**0.9 ± 0.2**
AUC0–24 (µg·h/mL)
Control group (n = 45)28.9 ± 5.256.7 ± 8.9287.5 ± 42.624.7 ± 3.5
Study group (n = 45)45.6 ± 6.7**85.6 ± 12.3**412.8 ± 58.3**35.2 ± 4.8**
t½ (h)
Control group (n = 45)4.3 ± 0.94.8 ± 0.712.4 ± 1.911.7 ± 1.6
Study group (n = 45)5.8 ± 1.1**5.2 ± 0.8*16.8 ± 2.5**12.5 ± 1.8*
CL (L/h)
Control group (n = 45)34.6 ± 5.210.6 ± 1.84.3 ± 0.724.2 ± 3.1
Study group (n = 45)22.0 ± 3.5**7.0 ± 1.2**3.0 ± 0.5**17.0 ± 2.3**

Comparison of baseline characteristics between the 2 groups (x̄ ± s)

IndicatorsControl group (n = 45)Study group (n = 45)Statistical (χ2/t)P
Demographic characteristics
Age (years)59.1 ± 10.258.3 ± 9.7t = 0.370.707
Proportion of males60.0% (27)62.2% (28)χ2 = 0.080.765
BMI (kg/m2)21.9 ± 2.822.4 ± 3.1t = −0.790.430
Primary kidney disease type
Diabetic nephropathy46.7% (21)44.4% (20)χ2 = 0.050.823
Hypertensive nephropathy26.7% (12)28.9% (13)χ2 = 0.060.806
Chronic glomerulonephritis22.2% (10)20.0% (9)χ2 = 0.070.792
Polycystic kidney4.4% (2)6.7% (3)FET1
Dialysis parameters
Dialysis age (months)38.3 ± 20.138.5 ± 11.1t = 1.110.269
Residual urine volume (mL/24 h)145 ± 72152 ± 68t = −0.840.403
Dialysis method (HDF:HD)26:1928:17χ2 = 0.180.669
Kt/V value1.49 ± 0.231.52 ± 0.21t = −0.620.531
Characteristics of TB
TB84.4% (38)86.7% (39)χ2 = 0.090.761
Extrapulmonary TB15.6% (7)13.3% (6)χ2 = 0.090.761
The proportion of cavitary pulmonary TB73.3% (33)75.6% (34)χ2 = 0.060.806
Classification of positive sputum smears (1 + /2 + /3+)16/17/618/15/6χ2 = 0.320.852
TB symptom score (0–10 points)6.5 ± 1.36.2 ± 1.5t = 1.000.320
Laboratory indicators
Hemoglobin (g/L)96.8 ± 11.798.5 ± 12.3t = −0.660.508
Serum creatinine (µmol/L)792.5 ± 142.8768.2 ± 156.4t = 0.760.449
Urea nitrogen (mmol/L)29.1 ± 7.228.3 ± 6.7t = 0.540.591
Albumin (g/L)34.7 ± 3.935.2 ± 4.1t = −0.580.559
hs-CRP (mg/L)20.1 ± 6.818.6 ± 7.3t = 1.090.275
Blood calcium (mmol/L)2.08 ± 0.292.12 ± 0.31t = −0.600.546
Blood phosphorus (mmol/L)1.92 ± 0.381.86 ± 0.42t = 0.700.485
iPTH (pg/mL)372.6 ± 166.2348.5 ± 152.7t = 1.100.273
Indicators of immunity
CD4 + T cell count (cells/µL)298 ± 102312 ± 108t = −0.750.454
CD8 + T cell count (cells/µL)703 ± 142685 ± 156t = 0.560.573
CD4 + /CD8 + ratio0.42 ± 0.140.46 ± 0.15t = −1.280.203
IL-6 (pg/mL)26.1 ± 9.524.3 ± 8.7t = 1.170.242
Comorbidity
Diabetes55.6% (25)51.1% (23)χ2 = 0.180.669
Coronary heart disease26.7% (12)24.4% (11)χ2 = 0.070.792
Hypertension71.1% (32)75.6% (34)χ2 = 0.240.624
History of drug use
Previous history of anti-TB treatment13.3% (6)15.6% (7)χ2 = 0.100.752
History of immunosuppressive therapy11.1% (5)8.9% (4)FET0.732

The negative conversion rate of sputum bacteria in the 2 groups changed dynamically (%, n/N)

Time pointControl group (n = 45)Study group (n = 45)OR95% CIP
4 weeks of treatment35.6% (16/45)62.2% (28/45)3.271.52–7.050.011
8 weeks of treatment60.0% (27/45)86.7% (39/45)4.331.71–10.980.004
12 weeks of treatment73.3% (33/45)93.3% (42/45)5.091.43–18.110.011

Comparison of clinical efficacy between the 2 groups (x̄ ± s)

GroupsnCuringMarkedly effectiveEffectiveIneffectiveχ2P
Control group4518 (40.0%)10 (22.2%)8 (17.8%)9 (20.0%)12.94<0.001
Study group4536 (80.0%)6 (13.3%)2 (4.4%)1 (2.2%)

Effect of dialysis on clearance of major antituberculosis drugs (x̄ ± s)

ParameterHRZE
CLDAA142.5 ± 15.365.4 ± 7.258.7 ± 6.5172.8 ± 18.7
ER0.59 ± 0.060.27 ± 0.030.24 ± 0.030.72 ± 0.08
Non-dialysis day t½ (h)5.8 ± 1.15.2 ± 0.816.8 ± 2.512.5 ± 1.8
Dialysis day t½ (h)3.2 ± 0.6#2.8 ± 0.5#9.4 ± 1.3#6.5 ± 1.0#

Incidence of adverse reactions (n (%))

Adverse eventsControl group (n = 45)Study group (n = 45)χ2P
Liver injury22.2% (10/45)6.7% (3/45)4.680.031
Optic neuritis15.6% (7/45)0% (0/45)7.500.006
Hyperuricemia31.1% (14/45)13.3% (6/45)4.180.041
Peripheral neuropathy8.9% (4/45)8.9% (4/45)0.001.000
Total adverse reactions62.2% (28/45)24.4% (11/45)13.31<0.001

Rates of radiographic improvement at week 12 in both groups (%, n/N)

ParametersControl group (n = 45)Study group (n = 45)OR95% CIP
Cavity closure rate48.9% (22/45)76.5% (34/45)3.231.32–7.930.009
Absorption rate of the infiltrated lesion62.2% (28/45)82.2% (37/45)2.811.06–7.430.034
Absorption rate of pleural effusion68.9% (31/45)88.9% (40/45)3.611.17–11.120.020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/abm-2026-0021 | Journal eISSN: 1875-855X | Journal ISSN: 1905-7415
Language: English
Page range: 182 - 193
Published on: Jun 30, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Wei Song, Zhao Yang, Yuqian Zhao, Bing Liu, Musong Li, Wei Du, Ning Niu, Jianru Jia, published by Chulalongkorn University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.