Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Comparison of relevant data of patients with and without recurrence after ERCP combined with EST stone extraction
| Group | Male/female | Age (years) | Diameter of CBD (mm) | Angle of CBD (°) | Maximum diameter of stones (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recurrence group (n = 34) | 11/23 | 66.60 ± 15.80 | 12.63 ± 3.46 | 131.79 ± 12.05 | 11.40 ± 0.38 |
| Non-recurrence group (n = 114) | 41/73 | 59.20 ± 16.10 | 10.79 ± 2.88 | 140.49 ± 12.13 | 11.30 ± 0.39 |
| χ2/t value | 0.97 | 2.21 | 3.12 | 3.67 | 0.09 |
| P value | 0.32 | 0.28 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.94 |
Comparison of data related to patients with complete stone removal and residual stones after ERCP combined with EST stone extraction
| Group | Male/female | Age (years) | Diameter of CBD (mm) | Angle of CBD (°) | Maximum diameter of stones (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Removal group (n = 108) | 36/72 | 60.10 ± 15.30 | 10.20 ± 2.58 | 143.76 ± 10.65 | 10.03 ± 3.91 |
| Residual stone group (n = 40) | 16/24 | 62.30 ± 18.70 | 12.67 ± 3.21 | 130.98 ± 11.41 | 12.15 ± 3.13 |
| χ2/t value | 0.98 | 0.72 | 5.17 | 6.91 | 1.02 |
| P value | 0.32 | 0.46 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.32 |
Recurrence of choledocholithiasis after ERCP combined with EST lithotripsy risk factor analysis
| Factor | P | OR | Wals | β |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remnant biliary stone | <0.05 | 12.72 | 35.39 | 2.54 |
| Diameter of CBD | <0.05 | 1.24 | 12.50 | 0.22 |
| Angle of CBD | <0.05 | 0.95 | 11.50 | 11.50 |