Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Mesenchymal stem cells therapy for chronic ischemic stroke—a systematic review Cover

Mesenchymal stem cells therapy for chronic ischemic stroke—a systematic review

Open Access
|Oct 2024

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection process. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.
PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection process. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.

Figure 2.

MSCs can be sourced from bone marrow, adipose tissue, umbilical cord, and dental pulp. These cells can treat ischemic stroke by secreting neuroprotective factors, acting as immunomodulators, and promoting angiogenesis and neurogenesis [32,33,34]. Created with BioRender.com. MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells.
MSCs can be sourced from bone marrow, adipose tissue, umbilical cord, and dental pulp. These cells can treat ischemic stroke by secreting neuroprotective factors, acting as immunomodulators, and promoting angiogenesis and neurogenesis [32,33,34]. Created with BioRender.com. MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells.

Characteristics of extracted studies

ReferencesLocationStudy designSampleTime from stroke to therapyCell sourceRoute of administrationDosageOutcome measureFollow-up timeComparisonNOS score
Steinberg et al. [16]USAA non-randomized, open-label, single-arm study18Minimum 6 monthsAllogeneic cellsStereotactic intracranial injection2.5 × 106, 5.0 × 106, or 10 × 106ESS, NIHSS, FMA, F-M Motor Scale Score, mRSOn month 246
Levy et al. [15]USAA non-randomized, open-label, single-arm study36Minimum 6 monthsAllogeneic cellsIntravenousPhase I = 0.5 × 106, 1.0 × 106, and 1.5 × 106; phase 2 = 1.5 × 106/kg of body weightNIHSS, BI, MMSE, Geriatric Depression ScaleOn day 2, 3, 4, and 10, and on month 1, 3, 6, 9, and 126
Bhasin et al. [17]IndiaA non-randomized, open-label studyMSCs group = 6; control group = 6Minimum 3 monthsAutologous cellsIntravenous50–60 × 106FMA, mBIOn week 8, 24, 78, 156, and 208Placebo7
Chiu et al. [14]TaiwanA non-randomized, open-label, single-arm study3Minimum 6 monthsAutologous cellsStereotactic intracranial injection1.0 × 108NIHSS, mFMA sensation, BI, Berg Balance ScaleOn month 66

Search keywords

Electronic database nameKeywords
PubMed(Chronic[Title/Abstract]) AND ((Cerebral Ischemia[Title/Abstract]) OR (Ischemic Stroke[Title/Abstract]) OR (Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion[Title/Abstract]) OR (Cerebral Infarction[Title/Abstract]) OR (Ischemic Brain Injury[Title/Abstract])) AND ((Bone Marrow Derived Stem Cells[Title/Abstract]) OR (Adipose Derived Stem Cells[Title/Abstract]) OR (Umbilical-Cord Derived Stem Cells[Title/Abstract]) OR (Mesenchymal Stem Cells[Title/Abstract]))
PubMed Central(Chronic[Title/Abstract]) AND ((Cerebral Ischemia[Title/Abstract]) OR (Ischemic Stroke[Title/Abstract]) OR (Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion[Title/Abstract]) OR (Cerebral Infarction[Title/Abstract]) OR (Ischemic Brain Injury[Title/Abstract])) AND ((Bone Marrow Derived Stem Cells[Title/Abstract]) OR (Adipose Derived Stem Cells[Title/Abstract]) OR (Umbilical-Cord Derived Stem Cells[Title/Abstract]) OR (Mesenchymal Stem Cells[Title/Abstract]))
Google Scholarallintitle: mesenchymal stem cells chronic stroke
CENTRALIntervention (‘Mesenchymal stromal cells’ OR ‘Bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cells’ OR ‘Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells’ OR ‘Human dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells’) AND Population (‘Ischemic Stroke’ OR ‘Occlusion Of Artery’ OR ‘Ischemic Stroke’ OR ‘Cerebral Infarction’)”
ClinicalTrials.govCondition “Chronic Ischemic Stroke” AND Intervention “Mesenchymal stem Cells”

Summary of efficacy and safety outcomes

ReferencesEfficacy outcomeSafety outcomeStudy limitation
Steinberg et al. [16]The mean ± SD of baseline NIHSS total score, 9.3 ± 1.7, significantly improved at 12 months (−1.9, 95% CI: −2.6 to −1.1, P < 0.001) and 24 months (−2.1, 95% CI: −3.3 to −1.0, P < 0.01). Similarly, the mean ± SD of baseline FM total score, 133.6 ± 20.9, showed significant improvement at 12 months (19.2, 95% CI: 11.4–27.0, P < 0.001) and 24 months (19.4, 95% CI: 9.9–29.0, P < 0.01).At 24 months, all patients in the cohort experienced at least one AE. Common AEs and their respective percentages included headache related to surgical procedures (88.9%), nausea (33.3%), depression (22.2%), muscle spasticity (22.2%), vomiting (22.2%), increased blood glucose (16.7%), elevated C-reactive protein levels (16.7%), constipation (16.7%), fatigue (16.7%), pain in extremity (16.7%), and urinary tract infection (16.7%). Most of these AEs were mild (11.1%) or moderate (50.0%) in intensity.Small sample size and the used of uncontrolled study design.
Levy et al. [15]The median (interquartile range) of baseline NIHSS total score, 8 (6.5–10), significantly improved at 6 months (−1, P < 0.0001) and 12 months (−2, P < 0.001). The mean ± SD of baseline BI score, 65 ± 28.7, showed a notable gain of 6.8 points at 6 months (P = 0.0002) and further escalated to 10.8 points at 12 months (P < 0.001). The percentage of patients achieving an excellent functional outcome (BI score ≥95) increased from 11.4% at baseline to 27.3% at 6 months and 35.5% at 12 months.Out of 15 serious AEs, all were deemed unrelated or unlikely related to the investigational product. Among the 109 reported AEs, two were possibly related: a mild urinary tract infection and mild intravenous site irritation, both resulting in full recovery. Additional details are available in the study report.There was no control group and no study regarding the mechanism of action.
Bhasin et al. [17]In the MSCs group, both FM and mBI scores increased from baseline to the 208th week. The control group also showed notable improvement from baseline to the 4-year assessment. Baseline characteristics were aligned (P > 0.05), confirming comparability for evaluating therapy effectiveness at 8, 24, 78, 156, and 208 weeks. Notably, only mBI exhibited statistical significance at 208 weeks (95% CI: −12.9 to 0.49, P = 0.05) and at 156 weeks (95% CI: −1.26 to 1.76, P = 0.04). No significant difference in FM scores was observed at the 4-year examination (95% CI: −3.01 to 2.01, P = 0.19).After 9 months post-transplantation, one patient reported a skin allergy/rash. Subsequently, the patient was hospitalized for the issue, but it was determined that the infection was not related to the administered cells.Small sample size.
Chiu et al. [14]At 6 months, all patients exhibited improved motor functions (2–5 points) and sensory functions (0–2 points) compared to the initial NIHSS score. FMA scores indicated enhancements in both motor and sensory functions, while BI results highlighted improvements in daily life activities.AEs were reported, yet the authors concluded that they were unrelated to the administration of cell therapy. Unfortunately, specific details about these AEs were not provided.The sample size is limited and there is no group for comparison.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/abm-2024-0027 | Journal eISSN: 1875-855X | Journal ISSN: 1905-7415
Language: English
Page range: 194 - 203
Published on: Oct 31, 2024
Published by: Chulalongkorn University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 6 issues per year

© 2024 Mohammad Kurniawan, Yetty Ramli, Nadira Deanda Putri, Salim Harris, Al Rasyid, Taufik Mesiano, Rakhmad Hidayat, published by Chulalongkorn University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.