Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Lateral flow assay: a promising rapid point-of-care testing tool for infections and non-communicable diseases Cover

Lateral flow assay: a promising rapid point-of-care testing tool for infections and non-communicable diseases

Open Access
|Dec 2023

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Types of diagnostic methods.
Types of diagnostic methods.

Figure 2.

Components of lateral flow assays.
Components of lateral flow assays.

Figure 3.

Lateral flow assay designs. (A) Sandwich assay or not competitive assay: A visible signal produced at both the test line and control line indicates the positive result. The analyte is present in the sample and hybridized to the capturing molecule at the test line. The absence of analyte gave a negative result where the signal was only produced at the control line. The signal at the control line is a result of the hybridization of the capturing molecule at the control line region that is complementary to the free conjugate molecules. (B) Competitive assay: A visible signal only at the control line gave a positive result, indicating the competition of analytes with the capturing molecule and no aggregation of conjugated particles at the test line. However, the signal at both the test line and control line gave a negative result, indicating the absence of analytes in the sample and binding of conjugated particles to the capturing molecules at the test line.
Lateral flow assay designs. (A) Sandwich assay or not competitive assay: A visible signal produced at both the test line and control line indicates the positive result. The analyte is present in the sample and hybridized to the capturing molecule at the test line. The absence of analyte gave a negative result where the signal was only produced at the control line. The signal at the control line is a result of the hybridization of the capturing molecule at the control line region that is complementary to the free conjugate molecules. (B) Competitive assay: A visible signal only at the control line gave a positive result, indicating the competition of analytes with the capturing molecule and no aggregation of conjugated particles at the test line. However, the signal at both the test line and control line gave a negative result, indicating the absence of analytes in the sample and binding of conjugated particles to the capturing molecules at the test line.

Sensing modality, features, advantages, and disadvantages of various LFAs

Sensing modalityFeaturesAdvantagesDisadvantagesReferences
OpticalColorimetricColorimetric changes help to make a visual observation for result interpretationSensitivity issues that lead to result inaccuracy[53]
FluorescenceProvides results with higher signal to noise ratio; higher sensitivityFluorescent labels are not visible at low concentration; requires external reader for specific analysis[54]
SERSHigh sensitivity with very low detection limit; can be developed into ultiplex LFA for a wide range of detectionExpensive[55]
ChemiluminescenceHigh sensitivity when used together with metal nanoparticles; lower LOD; highly stable for immobilizationRequires addition of enzymatic substrate; low shelf-life[56]

ThermalThermal imagingImproved LOD and high sensitivity; no photo bleaching or photo instabilityThe infrared image sensors are massive; expensive[57]
Laser speckle imagingUses improved depth resolution reader that improves sensitivityExpensive and not suitable at resource-limited settings[58]
PA imagingPA imaging helps sample penetration deeper that improves the sensitivity of detectionStrips need to be dried before analysis since acoustic waves travelling through water-interface is a challenge[44, 59]

MagneticMPQLow detection limit and highly sensitiveNot suitable for multiplex detection when using high affinity variants[52, 60]

ElectrochemicalAmperometry, cyclic voltametric, impedimetricThe ratio of applied voltage can be adjusted to increase the sensitivity of the detection; nanoparticle integration to improve LODRequires expensive reagents and multistep procedure[44, 61]

Different properties of various POCT devices

TypesPropertiesReferences
Qualitative strip–based handheld POCT devices
  • Immunochromatographic reaction

  • Signaling depends on the simple visualization of olorimetric changes.

  • Portable

  • Test usually done at the site of patients’ care.

  • E.g.: LFDs, ICSs, and multiplex LFDs

[17, 18]
Quantitative strip or chip–based with unit use analyzers
  • Used for quantitative analysis

  • A reader is used to measure the reaction onto the strip.

  • Allows to measure the INR levels of certain metabolites or proteins in our body.

  • Test strips are for single use and disposed after the data collection.

  • Common for blood sugar and thrombin analysis

Bench top POCT analyzers
  • Requires sample containers, labelling and needed to be carried out in clinical settings.

  • Can be set up at different POC locations.

  • Miniaturized and increased computer processing.

  • Used for spectrophotometric enzyme-substrate measurement, hemagglutination, immunoassay, and blood gas analysis.

  • E.g.: agglutination assays, immunofiltration assays

Molecular biology–based/nucleic acid POCT devices
  • Used for detection of pathogenic diseases.

  • Rapidly quantifies nucleic acid from numerous infectious agents.

  • Incorporated molecular biology techniques such as isothermal amplification reaction

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/abm-2023-0068 | Journal eISSN: 1875-855X | Journal ISSN: 1905-7415
Language: English
Page range: 250 - 266
Published on: Dec 28, 2023
Published by: Chulalongkorn University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 6 issues per year

© 2023 Kumaravel Vealan, Narcisse Joseph, Sharizah Alimat, Anandi S. Karumbati, Karuppiah Thilakavathy, published by Chulalongkorn University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.