Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Propofol effects in rodent models of traumatic brain injury: a systematic review Cover

Propofol effects in rodent models of traumatic brain injury: a systematic review

Open Access
|Dec 2021

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Flow diagram of the study selection process.
Flow diagram of the study selection process.

Summary of study characteristics

No.ReferenceObjectivesAnimals/groupingsType of injuryAnalysisLimitations/recommendationsConclusion
1Menku et al. [20]Effect of propofol, propofol-citicoline combination on LP after head injury39 adult, male, Swiss Albino rats, 250–300 gDivided into 3 groups (n = 13 each):
  • Control group

  • Propofol group

  • Propofol + citicoline group

Moderate diffuse brain injuryPhysiological parameters
  • Heart rate

  • MAP

  • Hematocrit

  • pH

  • PaCO2

  • PaO2

MDA levelSOD levelGPx level
Combined use of therapeutic agents is more useful due to the synergetic effectsEffects of propofol on the activity of antioxidant enzyme system were stronger than its effect on LP
2Ding et al. [17]Therapeutic effects of propofol on brain edema following TBI and the modulating effect of propofol on AQP-4 expressionMale, Sprague Dawley rats, 250–300 gDivided into 4 groups:
  • TBI+P (n = 10)

  • P group (n = 10)

  • TBI group (n = 10)

  • Sham-operation group (n = 8)

Weight-drop injury
  • Brain edema

  • AQP-4 gene expression

  • AQP-4 level

  • IL-1β and TNF-α expression

  • Cultured astrocytes (NFκB and p38)

Control of brain edema and reduced neuroinflammation following TBI. May prove clinically useful in managing acute TBI as a multifunctional neuroprotective agent.Propofol treatment soon after TBI attenuates the development of edema and inhibits AQP-4 overexpression in rat models of TBI. Propofol modulates acute AQP-4 expression by attenuating IL-1β and TNF-α expression and inhibiting IL-1β and TNF-α-induced AQP4 expression
3Ma et al. [21]Role of NLRP3 and the effect of propofol to inhibit the NLRP3 inflammasome activation, which probably mediates the protective activity of propofol against the secondary injury following bTBIMale SPF Sprague Dawley rats (220–300 g)Divided into 6 groups (n = 8 each):
  • Normal group

  • bTBI-12 h and 24 h group rats were harvested at 12 h and 24 h after injury (n = 8, each subgroup)

  • bTBI-12 h and 24 h group treated with propofol (n = 8, each subgroup)

  • bTBI DMSO control group

Blast-induced TBI (bTBI)NLRP inflammasome mRNA expression TXNIP Caspase-1-p20 Cytokine level SOD MDA NSE-Overactivation of the NLRP3 inflammasome in the cerebral cortex may be involved in neuroinflammation during the secondary injury of bTBI in rats. Propofol might relieve the inflammatory response and attenuate brain injury by inhibiting ROS and reluctant depressing NLRP3 inflammasome activation and proinflammatory cytokine expression
4Eberspächer et al. [16]Effect of EEG-targeting low- and high-dose propofol infusion on acute histopathological damage in rats subjected to a moderate CCI39 male Sprague Dawley rats (400 ± 50 g)In 4 groups:
  • CCI/lowprop (n = 10)

  • CCI/highprop (n = 10)

  • CCI/halo (n = 10)

  • Sham/halo (n = 9)

CCIPhysiological evaluation
  • MAP

  • Heart rate

  • Hb

  • PaO2

  • PaCO2

  • pH

Respiratory rateGlucoseCore and pericranial temperatureLesion volumeEosinophilic cellsActivated caspase-3
Rupturing vessels during the impact that may lead to cortical and subcortical hemorrhage exacerbating the primary injuryEEG-targeted low- and high-dose propofol infusion for 6 h after CCI did not affect lesion volume or the number of eosinophilic cells in the hippocampus
5Kahveci et al. [18]Compared cerebral protective effects of isoflurane and propofol, when used in combination with moderatehypothermia (33–34 °C) in rats with TBI16 female Wistar rats (275–350 g)2 groups (n = 8 each):
  • Isoflurane group

  • Propofol group

Diffuse impact-accelerationPhysiological data
  • MAP

  • pH

  • PaCO2

  • PaO2

  • Hematocrit

Did not control the MAP during the study period.Investigation is needed to define the neuroprotective dose range of propofol in both experimental and human head injuryPropofol may be a better choice than isoflurane for use in combination with moderate hypothermia as treatment for head injury
6Liu et al. [19]Investigated the neuroprotective effects of propofol in rats following TBI, determined by neurological severity scores and expression of proinflammatory cytokines in the injured cortex212 adult male Sprague Dawley rats (200 ± 20 g)Divided into 4 groups (each group, n = 53):
  • Sham control group

  • TBI group

  • TBI+intralipid group

  • TBI+propofol group

Weight-drop injury
  • Neurological functional outcome (NSS test)

  • IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α mRNA expression

  • IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α protein level

-Cytokines, IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α play key roles in the pathophysiology of neuroinflammation in the delayed phase of TBI, and propofol could reduce the neurological impairment induced by TBI via suppression of inflammatory reaction
7Luo et al. [22]Anti-inflammatory effects of propofol after lateral fluid percussion TBIAdult male Sprague Dawley rats (300–340 g)Divided into 4 groups:
  • Isoflurane-TBI

  • Isoflurane-sham

  • Propofol-TBI

  • Propofol-sham No data on the number of rats per group

Lateral fluid percussion trauma
  • Animal physiology

  • Cognitive recovery (MWM test)

  • Lesion size after TBI

  • Neuronal loss in cortex

  • Microglial activation

  • Propofol reduces lipopo-lysaccharide-stimulated primary microglia activation and neurotoxicity

  • NADPH oxidase activity

  • Expression of gp91phox and p22phox

General anesthetics before and during the delivery of TBI, which do not ideally reflect clinical situationsEffects of propofol on microglial activation substantial
8Öztürk et al. [27]Effects of propofol and erythropoietin (Epo) on brain injury caused by oxidative stress and antioxidant properties of these agents after CHI60-d-old female Wistar albino rats (200–250 g)Divided into 5 groups:
  • Control (n = 4)

  • CHI (n = 6)

  • Epo (n = 6)

  • Propofol (n = 6)

  • Epo + propofol (n = 6)

CHIBiochemical analysis
  • SOD activity

  • CAT activity

  • MDA level

  • XO level

  • NO level

Lack of functional outcome measuresEpo and propofol decreased oxidative stress by decreasing MDA and NO level in brain tissue after CHI. However, combination of Epo and propofol has no significant beneficial advantage over Epo or propofol alone
9Sebastiani et al. [23]Delayed single-bolus propofol applications at the peak of p75NTR p75expression after experimental TBI213 adult C57BL/6N and 15 NGFR–deficient mice 6 groups (propofol 6 h, propofol 24 h, vehicle 6 h, vehicle 24 h, NaCl 0.9% 6 h, NaCl 0.9% 24 h)CCI
  • Physiological data (each group, n = 11)

  • Delayed post-traumatic propofol sedation enhances brain lesion volume (each group, n = 10)

  • Post-traumatic propofol sedation induces αII-spectrin degradation and reversibly lowers c-Fos levels, but does not modulate caspase-3 activation (each group, n = 5)

  • Post-traumatic propofol sedation impairs long-term motor function (each group, n = 13)

  • Expression of p75NTR is increased after experimental TBI (each group, n = 9–10)

  • Propofol-mediated increase in brain damage after CCI is attenuated by pharmacological inhibition of p75NTR and in p75NTR-deficient animals (each group, n = 11 adult C57BL/6N; n = 5 NGFR–deficient mice)

  • Propofol-mediated neuronal cell death is attenuated in NGFR/ mice (each group, n = 5)

  • Propofol sedation inhibits proteolytic cleavage of proapoptotic p75NTR ligand proBDNF after TBI (each group, n = 5)

Not statedPropofol sedation after acute brain lesion can have a deleterious impact and implicates a role for the pro-brain-derived neurotrophic factor-p75NTR p75 pathway. Propofol and other compounds with GABA receptor activity are frequently used in patients with acute brain pathologies to facilitate sedation or surgical and interventional procedures
10Statler et al. [24]Degree of neuroprotection provided by 7 anesthetics or sedatives (diazepam, fentanyl, isoflurane, ketamine, morphine, pentobarbital, and propofol) in a standard model of TBI81 adults, male Sprague Dawley rats (300–440 g)Divided into 9 groups of n = 9 (diazepam, fentanyl, isoflurane, ketamine, morphine, pentobarbital, propofol, none, and sham)CCI
  • MAP during experiment

  • Time to extubation

  • PaCO2 and PaO2 post TBI

  • Motor function

  • Cognitive testing

  • Histological analysis

Compared various anesthetics/sedatives, does not allow precise assessment of the effects of individual anesthetics/sedatives when administered in the absence of isoflurane pretreatment (isoflurane may be neuroprotective). Difficulty comparing the potency of inhalational and intravenous anesthetics (equipotent doses, based on the traditional concept of MAC, may not have been achieved)Medications commonly used in clinical TBI, narcotics and propofol, produced the poorest outcomes. By contrast, isoflurane, which is frequently used in experimental TBI, was associated with the best outcomes
11Thal et al. [25]To establish the influence of propofol on endogenous neurogenesis and functional recovery after TBI, rats were sedated with propofol (36 or 72 mg/kg/h) either during (0.5 h before until 1.5 h after CCI) or 2 h after TBI (3 h propofol sedation with 32 mg/kg/h (low dose (LD)) or 72 mg/kg/h (high dose (HD))116 male Sprague Dawley rats (280–330 g) divided into 5 groups in study A and 5 groups in study B (various number of mice per group)Study A:
  • Naïve (n = 10)

  • Sham36 (n = 11)

  • Sham72 (n = 12)

  • CCI36 (n = 10)

  • CCI72 (n = 11)

Study B:
  • Naïve (n = 10)

  • Primary lesion (n = 11)

  • CCI + 0 (n = 11)

  • CCI + LD (n = 13)

  • CCI + HD (n = 17)

CCI
  • Mortality, physiological variables, lesion volume

  • Study A: Influence of peritraumatic propofol infusion on neurogenesis, dentate gyrus volume, and neurofunctional outcome

  • Study B: Influence of post-traumatic propofol on neurogenesis and neurofunctional outcome

Use of BrdU to label newly generated cells in rodents, proliferation induced by ischemia reaches a maximum after 7–11 d. Study only following the subject for 7 d, proliferation after day 7 following CCI will not be detected and is missedPropofol infusion significantly attenuated post-traumatic neurogenesis, deteriorated neurofunctional recovery, and increased 28-d mortality.Potential negative effect of propofol after acute brain injury, especially when it is applied 2 h after CCI
12Yu et al. [26]Propofol could attenuate LP, calpain-induced CRMP2 degradation, and brain injury after TBI70 adult male Sprague Dawley rats (220–270 g) 7 groups of 9 rats (sham control, TBI, TBI + propofol 1 h, TBI + propofol 2 h, TBI + propofol 4 h, TBI + UE83836E, TBI + fat emulsion)Unilateral moderate CCI injury
  • Hemodynamics and arterial blood gas analysis

  • Propofol attenuates post-traumatic oxidative damage

  • Propofol reduces calpain-mediated αII-spectrin breakdown

  • Propofol reduces the proteolysis of collapsin response mediator protein-2 after TBI

  • Propofol protects neurons from TBI-induced apoptosis

Propofol ameliorates oxidative stress, suppresses calpain activation and CRMP2 proteolysis and reduces apoptosis, propofol likely may interact with other signaling pathways that may or may not be involved in post-TBI peroxidation, calpain activation and CRMP2 degradation.The samples at 24 h following TBI: can only make conclusions regarding the transient neuroprotective effects of propofol postconditioning in TBI rats. Long-term and dose-dependent effects of propofol must be investigated further.Additional time points are also needed to determine the best therapeutic window for propofoladministration. Extrapolating the therapeutic regimen of propofol for TBI rats to patients with moderate TBI should be performed cautiously and requires further clinical research.Propofol postconditioning alleviates calpain-mediated CRMP2 proteolysis and provides neuroprotective effects following moderate TBI potentially by counteracting LP and reducing calpain activation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/abm-2021-0032 | Journal eISSN: 1875-855X | Journal ISSN: 1905-7415
Language: English
Page range: 253 - 265
Published on: Dec 30, 2021
Published by: Chulalongkorn University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 6 issues per year

© 2021 Riyadh Firdaus, Sandy Theresia, Ryan Austin, Rani Tiara, published by Chulalongkorn University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.