Diagnostic tests to assess balance in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review of their validity and reliability

Arsh, Aatik; Darain, Haider; Ullah, Irfan; Shakil-ur-Rehman, Syed

doi:10.2478/abm-2021-0014

Abstract

Background

Sophisticated biomechanical instruments can assess balance in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) with accuracy and precision; however, they are costly and time consuming to use. Clinical diagnostic tests to assess balance in patients with SCI are less costly and easier to use, but there is limited literature available regarding their reliability and validity.

Objectives

To review systematically articles reporting the validity and reliability of diagnostic tests used to assess balance function in patients with SCI.

Methods

We searched for articles in the English language from the earliest record to December 15, 2020, which reported validity or reliability of any clinical instrument or diagnostic test used to assess balance in patients with SCI. Articles assessing balance in paraplegic patients with causes other than SCI were excluded. Databases included MEDLINE, AMED, EMBASE, HMIC, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist was used to assess the studies included and PRISMA-DTA guidelines were applied.

Results

We included 16 articles that assessed the validity or reliability of 10 diagnostic tests. The Functional Reach Test (FRT), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) were assessed by more than 1 study, while the remaining 7 diagnostic tests including the Function in Sitting Test, T-Shirt Test, Motor Assessment Scale item 3, Sitting Balance Score, 5 Times Sit-to-Stand Test, Tinetti scale, and Sitting Balance Measure were assessed by 1 study each. The FRT has good-to-excellent test–retest reliability, excellent inter-rater reliability, and good construct, concurrent, and convergent validity. The BBS has excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability, high internal consistency, and good concurrent and construct validity. The Mini-BESTest has excellent test–retest reliability, excellent inter-rater reliability, high internal consistency, and good concurrent, convergent, and construct validity.

Conclusions

The FRT, BBS, and Mini-BESTest appear to be valid and reliable clinical instruments to assess balance function in patients with SCI.

References

Chou CH, Hwang CL, Wu YT. Effect of exercise on physical function, daily living activities, and quality of life in the frail older adults: a meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93:237–44.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wulf G, Shea C, Lewthwaite R. Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors. Med Educ. 2010; 44:75–84.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Winter DA, Patla AE, Ishac M, Gage WH. Motor mechanisms of balance during quiet standing. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003; 13:49–56.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
de Kam D, Roelofs JMB, Bruijnes AKBD, Geurts ACH, Weerdesteyn V. The next step in understanding impaired reactive balance control in people with stroke: the role of defective early automatic postural responses. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017; 31:708–16.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Alves J, Santos A. Virtual reality therapy for balance training in aging and neurological disorders. J Adv Neurosci Res. 2016; 3:1–8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hardin EC, Kobetic R, Triolo RJ. Ambulation and spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2013; 24:355–70.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jannings W, Pryor J. The experiences and needs of persons with spinal cord injury who can walk. Disabil Rehabil. 2012; 34:1820–6.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nas K, Yazmalar L, Şah V, Aydın A, Öneş K. Rehabilitation of spinal cord injuries. World J Orthop. 2015; 6:8–16.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Harkema SJ, Schmidt-Read M, Lorenz DJ, Edgerton VR, Behrman AL. Balance and ambulation improvements in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury using locomotor training–based rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93:1508–17.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Emerich L, Parsons KC, Stein A. Competent care for persons with spinal cord injury and dysfunction in acute inpatient rehabilitation. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2012; 18:149–66.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
van Hedel HJA, Dietz V. Rehabilitation of locomotion after spinal cord injury. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2010; 28:123–34.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mancini M, Horak FB. The relevance of clinical balance assessment tools to differentiate balance deficits. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010; 46:239–48.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Arora T, Oates A, Lynd K, Musselman KE. Current state of balance assessment during transferring, sitting, standing and walking activities for the spinal cord injured population: a systematic review. J Spinal Cord Med. 2020; 43:10–23.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chaudhry H, Bukiet B, Ji Z, Findley T. Measurement of balance in computer posturography: comparison of methods—a brief review. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2011; 15:82–91.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Clark RA, Bryant AL, Pua Y, McCrory P, Bennell K, Hunt M. Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance. Gait Posture. 2010; 31:307–10.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Alexander MS, Anderson KD, Biering-Sorensen F, Blight AR, Brannon R, Bryce TN, et al. Outcome measures in spinal cord injury: recent assessments and recommendations for future directions. Spinal Cord. 2009; 47:582–91.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lam T, Noonan VK, Eng JJ; SCIRE Research Team. A systematic review of functional ambulation outcome measures in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2008; 46:246–54.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Salameh JP, Bossuyt PM, McGrath TA, Thombs BD, Hyde CJ, Macaskill P, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist. BMJ. 2020; 370:m2632. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2632
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, Terwee CB. COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27:1171–9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, de Vet HCW, Terwee CB. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27:1147–57.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Adegoke BOA, Ogwumike OO, Olatemiju A. Dynamic balance and level of lesion in spinal cord injured patients. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2002; 31:357–60.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Boswell-Ruys CL, Sturnieks DL, Harvey LA, Sherrington C, Middleton JW, Lord SR. Validity and reliability of assessment tools for measuring unsupported sitting in people with a spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90:1571–77.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Field-Fote EC, Ray SS. Seated reach distance and trunk excursion accurately reflect dynamic postural control in individuals with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2010; 48:745–49.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lynch SM, Leahy P, Barker SP. Reliability of measurements obtained with a modified functional reach test in subjects with spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 1998; 78:128–33.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sprigle S, Maurer C, Holowka M. Development of valid and reliable measures of postural stability. J Spinal Cord Med. 2007; 30:40–49.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sprigle S, Wootten M, Sawacha Z, Thielman G. Relationships among cushion type, backrest height, seated posture, and reach of wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2003; 26:236–43.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Srisim K, Saengsuwan J, Amatachaya S. Functional assessments for predicting a risk of multiple falls in independent ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015; 38:439–45.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wirz M, Muller R, Bastiaenen C. Falls in persons with spinal cord injury: validity and reliability of the Berg Balance Scale. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010; 24:70–7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tamburella F, Scivoletto G, Iosa M, Molinari M. Reliability, validity, and effectiveness of center of pressure parameters in assessing stabilometric platform in subjects with incomplete spinal cord injury: A serial cross-sectional study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014; 11:86–98.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jørgensen V, Opheim A, Halvarsson A, Franzén E, Roaldsen KS. Comparison of the Berg Balance Scale and the Mini-BESTest for assessing balance in ambulatory people with spinal cord injury: validation study. Phys Ther. 2017; 97:677–87.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lemay JF, Nadeau S. Standing balance assessment in ASIA D paraplegic and tetraplegic participants: concurrent validity of the Berg Balance Scale. Spinal Cord. 2010; 48: 245–50.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chan K, Unger J, Lee JW, Johnston G, Constand M, Masani K, Musselman KE. Quantifying balance control after spinal cord injury: reliability and validity of the mini-BESTest. J Spinal Cord Med. 2019; 42(suppl 1):141–8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Roy A, Higgins J, Nadeau S. Reliability and minimal detectable change of the mini-BESTest in adults with spinal cord injury in a rehabilitation setting. Physiother Theory Pract. 2021: 37:126–34.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Abou L, Sung JH, Sosnoff JJ, Rice LA. Reliability and validity of the function in sitting test among non-ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2020; 43:846–53.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jørgensen V, Elfving B, Opheim A. Assessment of unsupported sitting in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2011; 49:838–43.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wadhwa G, Aikat R. Development, validity and reliability of the ‘Sitting Balance Measure’ (SBM) in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2016; 54:319–23.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2004; 21:1371–1383.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Amatachaya S, Wannapakhe J, Arrayawichanon P, Siritarathiwat W, Wattanapun P. Functional abilities, incidences of complications and falls of patients with spinal cord injury 6 months after discharge. Spinal Cord. 2011; 49:520–4.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kirshblum SC, Priebe MM, Ho CH, Scelza WM, Chiodo AE, Wuermser LA. Spinal cord injury medicine. 3. Rehabilitation phase after acute spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88(3 Suppl 1):S62–70.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Barbeau H, Nadeau S, Garneau C. Physical determinants, emerging concepts, and training approaches in gait of individuals with spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2006; 23:571–85.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tamburella F, Scivoletto G, Molinari M. Balance training improves static stability and gait in chronic incomplete spinal cord injury subjects: a pilot study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2013; 49:353–64.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nardone A, Schieppati M. The role of instrumental assessment of balance in clinical decision making. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010; 46:221–37.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yelnik A, Bonan I. Clinical tools for assessing balance disorders. Neurophysiol Clin. 2008; 38:439–45.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Noohu MM, Dey AB, Hussain ME. Relevance of balance measurement tools and balance training for fall prevention in older adults. J Clin Gerontol Geriatr. 2014; 5:31–5.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sibley KM, Straus SE, Inness EL, Salbach NM, Jaglal SB. Clinical balance assessment: perceptions of commonly-used standardized measures and current practices among physiotherapists in Ontario, Canada. Implement Sci. 2013; 8:33. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-33
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Park E-Y, Kim W-H. Correlation of Berg balance scale and functional reach test. Phys Ther Korea. 2007; 14:28–34.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Moore JL, Potter K, Blankshain K, Kaplan SL, O’Dwyer LC, Sullivan JE. A core set of outcome measures for adults with neurologic conditions undergoing rehabilitation: a clinical practice guideline. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2018; 42:174–220.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tyson SF, Connell LA. How to measure balance in clinical practice. A systematic review of the psychometrics and clinical utility of measures of balance activity for neurological conditions. Clin Rehabil. 2009; 23:824–40.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Page MJ, Shamseer L, Tricco AC. Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting. Syst Rev. 2018; 7:32. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0699-4
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article