Comparative study of effective-site target controlled infusion with standard bolus induction of propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion
By:
References
- 1. Brain AIJ. The laryngeal mask-a new concept in airway management. Br J Anesth. 1983; 55: 801-5.
- 2. Brodrick PM, Webster NR, Nunn JF. The laryngeal mask airway. A study of 100 patients during spontaneous breathing. Anaesthesia. 1989; 44:238-41.10.1111/j.1365-2044.1989.tb11233.x
- 3. Smith I, White PF. Use of the laryngeal mask airway as an alternative to a face mask during outpatient arthroscopy. Anesthesiology. 1992; 77: 850-5.
- 4. Braude N, Clements EAF, Hodges UM, Andrews BP. The pressor response and laryngeal mask insertion. A comparison with tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia. 1989; 44:551-4.10.1111/j.1365-2044.1989.tb11439.x
- 5. Brimacombe J.The advantage of the LMA over the tracheal tube or facemask: a meta-analysis. Can J Anesth. 1995; 42:1017-23.
- 6. Brain AIJ. The Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Instruction Manual. Henley:Intavent Research, 1995.
- 7. Coates DP, Monk CR, Prys Roberts C, Turtle M. Hemodynamic effects of infusions of the emulsion formulation of propofol during nitrous oxide anesthesia in humans. Anesth Analg. 1987; 66: 64-70.10.1213/00000539-198701000-00011
- 8. Schwilden H. A general method for calculating the dosage scheme in linear pharmacokinetics. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1981; 20:379-86.
- 9. Shafer SL, Gregg KM. Algorhithms to rapidly achieve and maintain stable drug concentrations at the site of drug effect with a computer-controlled infusion pump. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1992; 20:147-69.
- 10. Schnider T, Minto C, Shafer SL, Gambus PL, Andresen C, Goodale DB, Youngs EJ. The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology.1999; 90:1502-16.
- 11. Struys MMRF, De Smet T, Depoorter B, Versichelen LFM, Mortier EP, Dumortier FJE, et al. Comparison of plasma compartment versus two methods for effect compartment-controlled target comtrolled infusion for propofol. Anesthesiology. 2000; 92:399-406.10.1097/00000542-200002000-00021
- 12. Wakeling HG, Zimmerman JB, Howell S, Glass PSA. Targeting effect compartment or central compartment concentration for propofol. Anesthesiology. 1999; 90: 92-7.
- 13. Taylor N, Kenny GNC. Requirements for targetcontrolled infusion of propofol to insert the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia. 1998; 53:222-6.
- 14. Kodaka M, Handa F, Kawasaki J, Miyao H. Cp50 of propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion using predicted concentrations with and without nitrous oxide. Anaesthesia. 2002; 57:956-9.10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02821.x
- 15. Baik HJ, Kim JH, Lee CH. Laryngeal mask insertion during target-controlled infusion of propofol. J Clin Anesth. 2001; 13:175-81.10.1016/S0952-8180(01)00237-9
- 16. Matta BF, Marsh DS, Nevin M. Laryngeal mask airwaya more successful method of insertion. J Clin Anesth. 1995; 7:132-5.10.1016/0952-8180(94)00027-2
- 17. Somboonvibul W, Lelanukrom R, Sriprachittichai P. The laryngeal mask airway in pediatric anesthesia. Thai J Anesthesiol. 1995; 21: 64-9.
- 18. Schwilden H. A general method for calculating the dosage scheme in linear pharmacokinetics, Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1981; 20: 379.10.1007/BF00615409
- 19. Marsh B, White M, Morton N, Kenny GN. Pharmacokinetic model driven infusion of propofol in children. Br J Anaesth. 1991; 67: 41-8.
- 20. Higuchi H, Adachi Y, Arimura S, Nitahara K, Satoh T. Oral clonidine premedication reduces the EC50 of propofol concentration for laryngeal mask airway insertion in male patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002; 46: 372-7.
- 21. Casati A, Fanelli G, Casaletti E, Cedrati V, Veglia F, Torri G. The target plasma concentration of propofol required to place laryngeal mask versus cuffed oropharyngeal airway. Anesth Analg. 1999; 88: 917-20.10.1213/00000539-199904000-00043
- 22. Kodaka M, Handa F, Kawasaki J, Miyao H. Cp50 of propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion using predicted concentrations with and without nitrous oxide. Anaesthesia. 2002; 57:956-9.10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02821.x
- 23. Brimacombe J. Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia: Principles and Practice, 2nd edition. New York:Saunders, 2005.
- 24. Ludbrook GL, Upton RN. A physiological model of induction of anaesthesia with propofol in sheep. 2. Model analysis and implications for dose requirements. Br J Anaesth. 1997; 79: 505-13.
Language: English
Page range: 177 - 182
Published on: Apr 13, 2018
Published by: Chulalongkorn University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 6 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2018 Krairerk Sintavanuruk, Sukanya Pongruekdee, Russana Thaharavanich, Surajak Laosuwan, Somrat Charuluxananan, published by Chulalongkorn University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.