Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Clinical and economic issues complicating cost-effectiveness evaluation of orphan diseases Cover

Clinical and economic issues complicating cost-effectiveness evaluation of orphan diseases

Open Access
|May 2017

References

  1. 1. Zicht op zinnige en duurzame zorg. Zoetermeer: Raad voor de Volksgezondheid en Zorg, 2006.
  2. 2. College voor zorgverzekeringen (since 2014 Zorginstituut Nederland). Diemen 2012. Report assessment health outcomes research alglucosidase alfa (Myozyme®) for Pompe disease. Diemen: CVZ; 2012. http://www.cvz.nl/binaries/live/%20cvzinternet/hst_content/nl/documenten/rapporten/2012/rpt211-ziekte-van-pompe.pdf.
  3. 3. College voor zorgverzekeringen (since 2014 Zorginstituut Nederland). Diemen 2012. Report assessment health outcomes research agalsidase alfa (Replagal®) and agalsidase bèta (Fabrazyme®) for Fabry disease. Diemen: CVZ; 2012. http://www.cvz.nl/binaries/live/cvzinternet/hst_content/nl/documenten/rapporten/2012/rpt1211-ziekte-van-fabry.pdf.
  4. 4. Letter of Ministry of Health 29 January 2013. The Netherlands.
  5. 5. Letter of Ministry of Health 3 October 2013. The Netherlands.
  6. 6. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Appraising Orphan Drugs. Last updated: 14 April 2008. www.nice.org.uk/aboutnice/whoweare/seniormanagementteam/meetings/2005/12july2005/appraising_orphan_drugs.jsp; www.nice.org.uk/niceMedia/pdf/smt/120705item4.pdf.
  7. 7. Hutton J, Rutten FFH, Hasselt van P, Oosterwijk C, Dubois D, Nuijten MJC. Economic relevance and validation procedure. Orphan Medicinal Products. Munich, 28 February 2014, ISBN: 978-94-91526-04-6.
  8. 8. Rabinovich, M., Greenberg, D. and Shemer, J.(2007). Threshold values for cost-effectiveness ratio and public funding of medical technologies. Harefuah 146, 453-458, 500.
  9. 9. Nuijten MJ, Dubois DJ. Cost-utility analysis: current methodological issues and future perspectives. Front Pharmacol 2011. Jun 8;2:29. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2011.00029. eCollection 2011.
  10. 10. http://www.emea.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/regulation/general/general_content_000029.jsp&mid=WC0b01a
  11. 11. European Medicines Agency. EPAR Myozyme. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_Scientific_Discussion/human/000636/WC500032128.pdf
  12. 12. Acquadro C, Berzon R, Dubois D. Incorporating the Patient’s Perspective into Drug Development and Communication: An Ad Hoc Task Force Report of the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Harmonization Group Meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001. Value in Health. Volume 6, Number 5, 2003, 522-531.10.1046/j.1524-4733.2003.65309.x14627058
  13. 13. EUnetHTA JA1 WP5 methodology guidelines Endpoints used for relative effectiveness assessment of pharmaceuticals HEALTHRELATED QUALITY OF LIFE and UTILITY MEASURES. February 2013.
  14. 14. Sussex J, Rollet P, Garau M et al. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Value Orphan Medicines. Research Paper 13/03. OHE. May 2013.10.2139/ssrn.2631463
  15. 15. Deverka PA et al. Economic Opportunities and Challenges for Pharmacogenomics; Annual Revue of Pharmacology and Toxicology 50: 423-37, 2010.10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.010909.10580520055709
Language: English
Page range: 132 - 137
Published on: May 9, 2017
Published by: European Biotechnology Thematic Network Association
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2017 Mark J.C. Nuijten, Marja H. Pronk, John Hutton, Peter van Hasselt, Cor Oosterwijk, Frans F.H. Rutten, published by European Biotechnology Thematic Network Association
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.