Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Tracheal intubation with channeled vs. non-channeled videolaryngoscope blades Cover

Tracheal intubation with channeled vs. non-channeled videolaryngoscope blades

By: Peter Biro and  Martin Schlaepfer  
Open Access
|Dec 2018

References

  1. 1. Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Blitt CD, Connis RT, Nickinovich DG, et al. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2013; 118: 251-270. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31827773b223364566
  2. 2. Ducharme S, Kramer B, Gelbart D, Colleran C, Risavi B, Carlson JN. A pilot, prospective, randomized trial of video versus direct laryngoscopy for paramedic endotracheal intubation. Resuscitation 2017; 114: 121-126. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation. 2017.03.022
  3. 3. Lewis SR, Butler AR, Parker J, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 11: CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub2
  4. 4. Parasa M, Yallapragada SV, Vemuri NN, Shaik MS. Comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscope with Macintosh laryngoscope in adult patients undergoing elective surgical procedures. Anesth Essays Res 2016; 10: 245-249. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.167840
  5. 5. Biro P, Fried E, Schlaepfer M, Kristensen MS. A new retrograde transillumination technique for videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 2018; 73: 474-479. doi: 10.1111/anae.14217
  6. 6. Valencia JA, Pimienta K, Cohen D, Benitez D, Romero D, Amaya O, et al. A comparison of King Vision video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy as performed by residents: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth 2016; 35: 571-575. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.07.03927871595
  7. 7. Cooper RM. Strengths and limitations of airway techniques. Anesthesiol Clin 2015; 33: 241-255. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2015.02.006
  8. 8. Alvis BD, Hester D, Watson D, Higgins M, St Jacques P. Randomized controlled trial comparing the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope with the King Vision video laryngoscope in adult patients. Minerva Anestesiol 2016; 82: 30-35
  9. 9. Kleine-Brueggeney M, Greif R, Schoettker P, Savoldelli GL, Nabecker S, Theiler LG. Evaluation of six videolaryngoscopes in 720 patients with a simulated difficult airway: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 2016; 116: 670-679. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew058
  10. 10. Kriege M, Alflen C, Noppens RR. Using King Vision video laryngoscope with a channeled blade prolongs time for tracheal intubation in different training levels, compared to nonchanneled blade. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0183382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183382.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21454/rjaic.7518.252.sch | Journal eISSN: 2502-0307 | Journal ISSN: 2392-7518
Language: English
Page range: 97 - 101
Submitted on: Aug 8, 2018
Accepted on: Aug 25, 2018
Published on: Dec 5, 2018
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2018 Peter Biro, Martin Schlaepfer, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.