Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Rehabilitative effect of the patterned stimulation with MP1 microperimeter in homonymous hemianopia Cover

Rehabilitative effect of the patterned stimulation with MP1 microperimeter in homonymous hemianopia

Vision Rehabilitation International
Volume 11 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)
By: ,  ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Jan 2020
Figures & tables

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Distribution of Visual Field mean deviation (VFMD) over the time (T). There is one outline in the VFMD column at T3. T0: baseline; T1: after training; T3: 3-months follow-up.

Figure 2

Distribution of Visual Field scotoma points (VFSP) over the time (T). T0: baseline; T1: after training; T3: 3-months follow-up.

Figure 3

Distribution of Microperimetry’s mean retinal sensitivity (MPRS) over the time (T). T0: baseline; T1: after training; T3: 3-months follow-up.

Figure 4

Distribution of Microperimetry’s scotoma points (MPSP) over the time (T). T0: baseline; T1: after training; T3: 3-months follow-up.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/vri-2020-005 | Journal eISSN: 2652-3647
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 41 - 47
Submitted on: Sep 14, 2020
Published on: Jan 1, 2020
Published by: Guide Dogs NSW/ACT
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Homonymous hemianopia,
Visual rehabilitation,
Microperimeter,
Visual stimulation
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Clinical medicine,
Physical and rehabilitation medicine

© 2020 Francesca de Rossi, Margherita Guidobaldi, Umberto Moscato, Camillo Marra, Filippo Amore, published by Guide Dogs NSW/ACT
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 11 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)
Previous article
Next article