Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Psychometric properties of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-C) used with a clinical sample of adolescents: a preliminary study

Open Access
|Apr 2021

References

  1. Locke KD, Sayegh L, Weber C, Turecki G. Interpersonal self-efficacy, goals, and problems of persistently depressed outpatients: prototypical circumplex profiles and distinctive subgroups. Assessment 2018;25(8):988–1000.
  2. Girard JM, Wright AGC, Beeney JE, Lazarus SA, Scott LN, Stepp SD, et al. Interpersonal problems across levels of the psychopathology hierarchy. Compr Psychiatry 2017;79:53–69.
  3. Grosse Holtforth M, Altenstein D, Krieger T, Flückiger C, Wright AGC, Caspar F. Interpersonal differentiation within depression diagnosis: relating interpersonal subgroups to symptom load and the quality of the early therapeutic alliance. Psychother Res 2014;24(4):429–41.
  4. Przeworski A, Newman MG, Pincus AL, Kasoff MB, Yamasaki AS, Castonguay LG, et al. Interpersonal pathoplasticity in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder. J Abnorm Psychol 2011;120(2):286–98.
  5. Costello EJ, Copeland W, Angold A. Trends in psychopathology across the adolescent years: what changes when children become adolescents, and when adolescents become adults? J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip 2011;52:1015–25.
  6. McFarquhar T, Luyten P, Fonagy P. Changes in interpersonal problems in the psychotherapeutic treatment of depression as measured by the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2018;226:108–23.
  7. Horowitz LM, Rosenberg SE, Baer BA, Ureño G, Villaseñor VS. Inventory of Interpersonal Problems: psychometric properties and clinical applications. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988;56(6):885–92.
  8. Barkham M, Hardy GE, Startup M. The IIP-32: a short version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Br J Clin Psychol 1996;35(1):21–35.
  9. Soldz S, Budman S, Demby A, Merry J. A short form of the inventory of interpersonal problems circumples scales. Assessment 1995;2(1):53–63.
  10. Horowitz LM, Alden LE, Wiggins JS, Pincus AL. Inventory of Interpersonal Problems manual. Odessa, FL: The Psychological Corporation; 2000.
  11. Hughes J, Barkham M. Scoping the inventory of interpersonal problems, its derivatives and short forms: 1988-2004. Clin Psychol Psychother 2005;12:475–96.
  12. Horowitz LM, Alden LE, Wiggins JS, Pincus AL. Inventory of Interpersonal Problems [Internet]. [cited 2020 Dec 30]. Available from: https://www.mindgarden.com/113-inventory-of-interpersonal-problems#horizontalTab4
  13. Lo Coco G, Mannino G, Salerno L, Oieni V, Di Fratello C, Profita G, et al. The Italian version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-32): psychometric properties and factor structure in clinical and non-clinical groups. Front Psychol 2018;9:341
  14. Akyunus M, Gencoz T. Psychometric properties of the inventory of interpersonal problems-circumplex scales short form: a reliability and validity study. Dusunen Adam: J Psychiatry Neurol Sci 2016;29(1):36–48.
  15. Qi W(G), Wang KT, Pincus AL, Wu LZ. Interpersonal problems and acculturative stress over time among Chinese international students from mainland China and Taiwan. Asian Am J Psychol. 2018;9:237–46.
  16. Bailey C, Abate A, Sharp C, Venta A. Psychometric evaluation of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems 32. Bull Menninger Clin. 2018;82(2):93–113.
  17. Kiesler DJ. The 1982 Interpersonal Circle: Aa taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychol Rev 1983;90(3):185–214.
  18. Wiggins JS, Trapnell P, Phillips N. Psychometric and geometric characteristics of the Revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS-R). Multivariate Behav Res 1988;23(4):517–30.
  19. Gurtman MB. Exploring personality with the Interpersonal Circumplex. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 2009;3(4):601–19.
  20. Alden LE, Wiggins JS, Pincus AL. Construction of Circumplex Scales for the Inventory of interpersonal problems. J Pers Assess 1990;55(3):521–36.
  21. Wiggins JS. An informal history of the interpersonal circumplex tradition. J Pers Assess 1996;66:217–33.
  22. Leary T. Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press; 1957.
  23. Weinryb RM, Gustavsson JP, Hellström C, Andersson E, Broberg A, Rylander G. Interpersonal problems and personality characteristics: psychometric studies of the Swedish version of the IIP. Pers Individ Dif 1996;20(1):13–23.
  24. Kunst H, Hoyer J. Psychometric analyses of IIP and NEO-FFI in offenders. Diagnostica 2003;49(1):24–33.
  25. Wilson S, Revelle W, Stroud CB, Durbin CE. A confirmatory bifactor analysis of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems–circumplex and associations of interpersonal traits across multiple relationship contexts and measures. Psychol Assess 2013;25(2):353–65.
  26. Gurtman MB, Balakrishnan JD. Circular measurement redux: the analysis and interpretation of interpersonal circle profiles. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 1998;5(3):344–60.
  27. Tracey TJG, Rounds J, Gurtman M. Examination of the general factor with the interpersonal circumplex structure: application to the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Multivariate Behav Res 1996;31(4):441–66.
  28. Pincus AL, Gurtman MB, Ruiz MA. Structural Analysis of Social Behavior (SASB): Circumplex analyses and structural relations with the interpersonal circle and the five-factor model of personality. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74(6):1629–45.
  29. Monsen JT, Hagtvet KA, Havik OE, Eilertsen DE. Circumplex structure and personality disorder correlates of the Interpersonal Problems model (IIP-C): construct validity and clinical implications. Psychol Assess 2006;18(2):165–73.
  30. Helsedirektoratet. Psykiske lidelser - barn og unge [Mental disorders – children and adolescents]. Available from: https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/pakkeforlop/psykiske-lidelser-barn-og-unge
  31. Achenbach TM, Becker A, Döpfner M, Heiervang E, Roessner V, Steinhausen HC, et al. Multicultural assessment of child and adolescent psychopathology with ASEBA and SDQ instruments: Research findings, applications, and future directions. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2008;49(3):251-75.
  32. Goodman R. The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip 1997;38(5):581–6
  33. Gowers SG, Harrington RC, Whitton A, Lelliott P, Beevor A, Wing J, et al. Brief scale for measuring the outcomes of emotional and behavioural disorders in children. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA). Br J Psychiatry 1999;174:413–6.
  34. Armsden GC, Greenberg MT. The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. J Youth Adolesc 1987;16(5):427–54.
  35. Nickel M, Luley J, Krawczyk J, Nickel C, Widermann C, Lahmann C, et al. Bullying girls - changes after brief strategic family therapy: a randomized, prospective, controlled trial with one-year follow-up. Psychother Psychosom 2006;75(1):47–55.
  36. Ulberg R, Hersoug AG, Hoglend P. Treatment of adolescents with depression: the effect of transference interventions in a randomized controlled study of dynamic psychotherapy. Trials 2012;13:159.
  37. Talebi Joybari M. Depression and interpersonal problems in adolescents: their relationship with alexithymia and coping styles. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci 2014;8(4):38–45.
  38. Havik OE, Monsen JT, Høglend P, Von Der Lippe AL, Lyngstad G, Stiles T, et al. Norwegian multi-center study of process and outcome in psychotherapy. 1995.
  39. Monsen JT, Hagtvet KA, Havik OE, Eilertsen DE. Circumplex structure and personality disorder correlates of the interpersonal problems model (IIP-C): construct validity and clinical implications. Psychol Assess 2006;18(2):165–73.
  40. Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA. Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms & Profiles [Internet]. [cited 2020 Dec 30]. Available from: https://aseba.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/ASEBA-Reliability-and-Validity-School-Age.pdf
  41. Heyerdahl S, Nøvik TS. Spørreskjema [Internet]. [cited 2020 Dec 30]. Available from: https://www.legeforeningen.no/foreningsledd/fagmed/norsk-barne–og-ungdomspsykiatrisk-forening/veiledere/veileder-i-bup/del-1-diagnostikk-og-utredning/instrumenter-som-bidrag-ved-diagnostikk/sporreskjema/
  42. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Cconventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 1999;6:1–55.
  43. Marsh HW, Hau KT, Wen Z. In search of golden rules: comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Struct Equ Model 2004;11:320–41.
  44. Awang Z. A handbook on SEM: structural equation modelling using amos graphics. Struct Equ Model 2012. 83–102.
  45. Gurtman MB, Pincus AL. Interpersonal adjective scales: confirmation of circumplex structure from multiple perspectives. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2000:26(3):374–84.
  46. MacCallum RC, Roznowski M, Necowitz LB. Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: the problem of capitalization on chance. Psychol Bull 1992;111(3):490–504.
  47. Kiesler DJ. Contemporary interpersonal theory and research: personality, psychopathology, and psychotherapy. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1996; 398. p.
  48. Pedersen S, Vitaro F, Barker ED, Borge AIH. The timing of middle-childhood peer rejection and friendship: Linking early behavior to early-adolescent adjustment. Child Dev 2007;78(4):1037–51.
  49. Langeveld JH, Israel P, Thomsen PH. Parental relations and referral of adolescents to Norwegian mental health clinics. Nord J Psychiatry 2010;64(5):327–33.
Language: English
Page range: 87 - 95
Published on: Apr 27, 2021
Published by: Psychiatric Research Unit
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year

© 2021 Pravin Israel, Johannes Hendrik Langeveld, published by Psychiatric Research Unit
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.