Introduction
The relationship between suicidal ideation and depressive symptomatology is well known (1). Between 60-85 % of adolescents with clinical depression report suicidal ideation, while the lifetime prevalence of suicidal ideation in general adolescent populations is much lower, about 9.2 % (2-4). Suicidal ideation is commonly defined as ideas and thoughts about death and harming or killing oneself (5). It spans a spectrum from passive wishes for death, to serious and specific plans of taking one’s life. More severe suicidal ideations, such as “I wish to kill myself”, are far less prevalent than milder forms, such as “I have thoughts of killing myself, but I would not carry it out” (6, 7). Adolescence is a period of significant change, both physically and cognitively, and the number of youth experiencing emotional and behavioral problems increases. As adolescents face new challenges and encounter increased pressure on several domains, there is a striking increase in suicidal ideation from childhood into adolescence (8). Young adolescents are particularly vulnerable to perceiving problems as overwhelming and given the earlier timing of their pubertal development, girls are most vulnerable and report more suicidal ideation and emotional problems (9).
Suicidal ideation is one of the strongest risk factors for suicide attempts and death by suicide both in adolescence and adulthood. Adolescents who report suicidal ideation are 12 times more likely to have attempted suicide by the age of 30 (10). Only a small subset of adolescents who report suicidal ideation later die by suicide (11, 12), however suicidal ideation has an important predictive value and has the potential to inform clinical interventions (13). Suicide is one of the leading causes of death among adolescents in many countries (3, 14). Not only does suicidal ideation increase the risk of suicide attempts and death by suicide in adolescents, suicidal ideation is an important marker for an array of significant impairments, such as higher risk of school dropout, poor psychosocial functioning, mood disorders, and externalizing disorders (10, 15). These problems can often persist long into adulthood if they go unrecognized (16). Among the potential risk factors implicated for suicidal ideation (14, 17-20), insecure attachment to parents may be particularly important to address in treatment. A better understanding of the role of relational factors, such as attachment style, in the development of suicidal ideation, is important for developing effective preventive strategies and interventions for adolescents who are experiencing clinical depression.
Attachment and suicidal ideation
Attachment theory might be a suitable developmental framework for understanding the interaction of interpersonal relationships with other factors that can lead to increased vulnerability to suicide (21). Attachment is an affective bond to one’s significant others. It is a specific aspect of the relationship between a child and caregiver that is involved in making the child feel safe, secure and protected (22). Adolescence is a period where multiple new attachment bonds are formed, but the attachment to parents remains important for developing a sense of self-reliance and social competence (23). Attachment to parents during adolescence differs from earlier ages because it emphasizes emotional autonomy while maximizing levels of support (24). Insecure attachment can be described in a two-dimensional model of avoidant and anxious attachment styles (25) based on Bowlby’s (23) original theory of internal working models. Adolescents with an avoidant attachment style, also called dismissive, tend to have a negative internal model of others and expect them to be unavailable and unsupportive, while adolescents with an anxious attachment style, also called preoccupied, are thought to have a negative internal model of themselves and low self-esteem. Early attachment experiences may serve as predisposing factors to suicidal ideation through their effects on self-esteem, emotion regulation, relationship functioning, and expectations for the future. Insecure attachment (high attachment anxiety and/or avoidance) is associated with a variety of ill effects on health, adjustment and well-being (26-29), and, importantly, increased risk of suicidal ideation (30).
Specific subtypes of insecure attachment may lead to different developmental trajectories with specific risk profiles. Adolescents with avoidant attachment in relation to their parents often have problems with intimacy and trusting others. They devalue interpersonal relationships, trying to avoid proximity, denying attachment needs, and avoiding closeness and interdependence in relationships (31). Deactivation or an avoidant strategy is also used in emotion regulation; in stressful situations they often attempt to block or inhibit any emotional state that can cause distress, as a consequence they often have more restricted expressions of emotions (26, 32). Mikulincer and Shaver (33) describe adolescents with an anxious attachment style as individuals who are sensitive to negative emotional experiences and extremely dependent on others and have an exaggerated need for support and validation from others. According to attachment theory, people with attachment anxiety are guided by an unfulfilled wish for more attention from attachment figures. Therefore, they tend to exaggerate and over-emphasize their sense of helplessness and vulnerability to arouse attention and care. Over time, this strategy may lead parents to reject the attachment need of these adolescents, which may lead to a vulnerability to developing suicidal ideation (34).
A better understanding of the association between specific subtypes of insecure attachment to either parent and suicidal ideation can provide valuable knowledge about who is at greater risk for suicidal ideation and inform interventions. Identifying predictors of suicidal ideation in clinical samples is important to reach adolescents who are at risk for suicidal attempt or death by suicide. A major limitation of previous studies on the association between insecure attachment style in adolescents and suicidal ideation is the lack of inclusion of fathers. Despite increased interest in fathers’ contributions to child and family (35), several studies have not differentiated between attachment to mother and attachment to father. Mostly, insecure attachment to parents have been assessed in general or limited to the parent who most likely influenced the child, or the composite sum of attachment to mother and father has been reported (36). The increased involvement of fathers in childrearing, particularly after infancy, underscores the need for more research exploring child-father attachment relationships and their association with suicidal ideation. Additionally, previous studies have typically not distinguished between adolescents with suicidal ideation and adolescents who make a suicide attempt when analyzing the association with insecure attachment (8, 37-39). Adolescents who experience suicidal ideation are different from adolescents who attempt suicide in their clinical presentation (11, 40). Combining these two groups complicates interpretations and the generalizability of findings. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the association between insecure attachment types to both parents and suicidal ideation.
Aims
The primary aim of this study was to investigate the association between attachment avoidance and attachment anxiety in relation to both mother and father, and suicidal ideation in a clinical sample of depressed adolescents. We hypothesized that both insecure attachment styles would be associated with suicidal ideation, but we expected that attachment anxiety in relation to either parent would be associated with higher levels of reported suicidal ideation because of negative self-view and sense of helplessness. Our secondary aim was to examine the unique association between the style of attachment to one’s mother versus father and suicidal ideation.
Methods
Participants
Data for this study came from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of adolescents with depression conducted at two Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service clinics in the county of Akershus, Norway. From October 2013 to January 2016, a total of 276 adolescents were screened for inclusion in the study. Progression through the assessment process is summarized in Figure 1. Participants were required to be currently living with an adult who had been one of their primary caregivers since before age four (to make sure participants had an early attachment relationship with their primary caregiver). Clinically referred adolescents (13-17 years old) and their parents were eligible to participate in the study if: 1) depression was listed as a reason for referral or 2) adolescents had been referred for reasons other than depression, but the adolescent scored > 6 on the Affective Problems subscale of the Youth Self Report form(41) at intake. Next, participants were assessed with Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) (42), those who scored > 17 went on to complete the full assessment which included a diagnostic interview. Adolescents meeting the DSM-IV-TR criteria for a current major depressive episode (43) and with a baseline score of 15 or above on clinician-rated Grid Hamilton Depression Rating scale (44), were included in the trial. Clinician-rated and self-reported measures of depression were both included in the screening, to get a clinical confirmation of the self-reported depressive symptoms. Adolescents meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria for any psychotic disorder, anorexia nervosa, bipolar disorder, intellectual disability or pervasive developmental disorders were excluded from the study. Eligible adolescents and parents provided written, informed consent and were then randomized to either Attachment Based Family Therapy (ABFT) or treatment as usual (TAU). The RCT study sample consisted of 61 adolescents (45). One patient withdrew consent shortly after randomization, 10 patients did not complete the Experiences in Close Relationships - Relationships Structure questionnaire (ECR-RS)(46). The current sample consisted of 50 adolescents, with a mean age of 15 years (SD = 1.3), 84% (N=42) of participants were girls. The project was approved by the Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics.

FIGURE 1.
Study participants from initial screening through analysis
Assessments
All assessments used in this study were conducted before randomization to either treatment. The adolescents and parents were assessed by a clinical psychologist at the clinic using a comprehensive assessment battery, including a diagnostic interview (Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime version) (47) and self-report measures.
Suicidal ideation was measured with the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire-Junior (SIQ-Jr) (48). SIQ-Jr is a 15-item self-report questionnaire measuring frequency and severity of suicidal thoughts on a 7-point scale with a total score ranging from 0 to 90 with higher scores indicating more suicidal thoughts. A score of 31 is the recommended clinical cutoff (89th percentile of the normative sample). Internal consistency in the current sample was α = .95.
The BDI-II (42) - a widely used 21-item self-report inventory - was used to assess the severity of depressive symptoms through the two weeks prior to inclusion in the study. Internal reliability was α = .94.
Attachment style to parents was measured using the ECR-RS (46), a nine-item self-report scale originally developed for adults, but it is also a highly useful and robust self-report attachment measure for adolescents (49). ECR-RS is based on ECR-R (50) item pool. The adolescents were encouraged to rate their relationship with both parents, regardless of whether or not they currently lived with them or had a close relationship with them. Some adolescents only had one caregiver and therefore provided information about only one. The attachment scores were computed into separate sum scores for attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance in relation to each parent. The anxious subscale consisted of 3 items (α = .73 for mother and α = .79 for father), and the avoidance subscale consisted of 6 items (α = .88 for mother α = .91 for father).
Data analytic strategy
Descriptive statistics were calculated for demographic variables, attachment variables, depression, and suicidal ideation. Due to the small sample size, and uneven number of mothers and fathers in the sample, separate analyses were performed initially to detect any potential association between the variables. To adjust for the potentially confounding influence of sex, age, and depression, these measures were included as independent variables in all models and in a separate model (Model 0). In the final model (Model 3), all attachment style measures that were significant in Models 1 and 2 were included to gauge the unique contribution of attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance in relation to each parent on suicidal ideation. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS Version 23 (51) for Windows. Missing data were mainly due to adolescents not completing the questionnaire. For adolescents declining to report on attachment relationship to either of the parent, the data were not imputed, this resulted in some cases being excluded from the analyses. Missing data were imputed using the Multiple Imputation method available in SPSS.
Results
Participant characteristics and a correlation matrix are presented in Table 1 for each variable used in the analyses. Sixty per cent of the adolescents scored above the clinical cut-off score on the SIQ-Jr. The results for the multiple regression analyses (Models 0 to 3) are presented in Table 2. In the null model (Model 0), not containing any attachment variables only level of depressive symptoms (t [42] = 3.23, p < .01) was associated with suicidal ideation.
TABLE 1.
Descriptive statistics and correlation matrix of study variables
| Variable | N | IQR | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Suicidal ideation (SIQ) | 50 | 18.75-60.25 | 40.12 | 23.48 | - | |||||||
| 2. Depression score (BDI-II) | 49 | 30-41 | 35.43 | 8.76 | .54** | |||||||
| 3. Age | 50 | 14-16 | 14.98 | 1.3 | -.19 | -.04 | ||||||
| 4. Gender | 50 | -.13 | -.20 | .05 | ||||||||
| 5. Attachment avoidance -mother | 49 | 2.67-4.83 | 3.72 | 1.42 | .36* | .15 | -.04 | .15 | ||||
| 6. Attachment anxiety - mother | 49 | 1.3-17 | 2.26 | 1.36 | .36* | .04 | .09 | .09 | .23 | |||
| 7. Attachment avoidance -father | 45 | 3.17-5.58 | 4.21 | 1.64 | .20 | .05 | -.1 | .11 | .23 | .12 | ||
| 8. Attachment anxiety - father | 45 | 1.17-4.17 | 2.79 | 1.36 | .27 | .04 | .26 | -.07 | -.09 | .45** | .30 | - |
| Model 0 | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insecure attachment styles in relation to mother | Insecure attachment styles in relation to father | Attachment anxiety in relation to mother and father | ||||||||||
| Independent variable | B | SE | CI (95%) | B | SE | CI (95%) | B | SE | CI (95%) | B | SE | CI (95%) |
| Gender | -6.65 | 8.61 | [-23.53, 10.23] | -4.02 | 7.99 | [-19.67, 11.63] | -8.14 | 8.48 | [-24.76, 8.48] | -7.60 | 7.75 | [-22.79, 7.60] |
| Age | -3.80 | 2.20 | [-8.11, .52] | -3.97 | 1.99 | [-7.89, -.06] | -4.84 | 2.22 | [-9.19, -,48] | -4.90 | 2.03 | [-8.87, -.93] |
| Depression score | 1.20 | .37 | [.47, 1.93] | 1.14 | .34 | [.49, 1.80] | 1.11 | .35 | [.42, 1.80] | 1.10 | .33 | [.43, 1.73] |
| Attachment avoidance - mother | 2.01 | 2.10 | [-2.11, 6.12] | |||||||||
| Attachment anxiety - mother | 5.65 | 2.02 | [1.69, 9.61] | 4.93 | 2.11 | [.80, 9.06] | ||||||
| Attachment avoidance - father | 1.18 | 1.98 | [-2.71, 5.07] | |||||||||
| Attachment anxiety - father | 3.83 | 1.92 | [.06, 7.59] | 2.56 | 1.80 | [-.96, 6.08] | ||||||
| R2 adj | .26 | .40 | .34 | .42 | ||||||||