Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
“Less stress”: a pilot study on a cognitive behavioral treatment program for anxiety in children with autism spectrum disorders Cover

“Less stress”: a pilot study on a cognitive behavioral treatment program for anxiety in children with autism spectrum disorders

Open Access
|Mar 2021
Read online

Figures & Tables

TABLE 1.

Overview of the “Less Stress” sessions

SessionContent
Parent session 1Conducted before session 1. Parents receive information regarding the program and the role of the parent during the treatment
Session 1“Getting to know each other” exercise. Introduction to the program, assessment of the child’s interests and what makes the child happy. Assessment of potential rewards that could be used
Session 2Psychoeducation on feelings, relaxation and anxiety. Setting goals for the program
Session 3Creating a toolbox for emotion regulation (”Relaxation tools” and “Special interest tools” based on sessions 1 and 2, and introduction to “Physical tools”, “Social tools”, “Other tools” and “Unhelpful tools”)
Session 4“Thinking tools” (cognitive restructuring) and “Doing-tools” (exposure)
Session 5“Thinking tools” and “Doing-tools”
Session 6“Problemsolving tools” + Exposure
Session 7“Completing the toolbox” + Exposure
Parent session 2Conducted before session 8: Update on progress/goal setting. Information regarding exposure work and role of the parents in the next treatment phase
Session 8-13Exposure-based targeting of the main anxiety problem(s)
Follow-up sessions 1-3Three follow-up sessions with a monthly interval (starting 1 month after session 13)

1 Note. Sessions 1-7 are focused on skills-training, psychoeducation and in-session exposures, whereas sessions 8-13 are mainly exposure-based

TABLE 2.

Therapist rated adherence and competence

Items rated by the therapist after every sessionMean (SD) range
1. To what extent did you follow the specified structure for the session?3.5 (0.5) 2-4
2. To what extent did you demonstrate your therapeutic process and relationship skills?3.5 (0.4) 2-4
3. To what extent did you think you focused on the goals set for the session?3.5 (0.3) 2-4
4. Based on an overall assessment, how competently did you experience yourself as a therapist this session?3.4 (0-5) 2-4

1 Note. Adherence (items 1-3) and competence (item 4).The items are rated from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very large extent).

TABLE 3.

User satisfaction rated by parents and children

MotherFatherChild
ItemsMean (SD)Mean (SD)Mean (SD)
I found the” Less Stress” program useful7.0 (0.0)6.6 (0.5)6.1 (0.8)
I have used some of what I learned during the program6.9 (0.4)5.4 (0.9)5.8 (0.9)
I liked the “Less Stress” program6.8 (0.5)6.4 (0.5)5.8 (2.1)
I will continue to use what I learned in the program6.8 (0.5)6.0 (0.7)5.9 (0.8)
I remember what I learned in the program6.4 (0.7)5.3 (0.5)5.5 (0.8)
Did you talk to your child/parent about “Less Stress”? (yes = 1 / no = 0)1.0 (0.0)0.6 (0.5)0.9 (0.4)
Were you content with the therapist?8.8 (0.5)8.4 (0.5)7.9 (1.8)

1 Note. The first six items were rated from 1 (very much disagree) to 7 (very much agree); the last item was rated from 1 (not content) to 9 (very content)

TABLE 4.

Comparing baseline values for completers and non-completers

Age yearsIQCGASSRSRCADSNumber of anxiety diagnosesComorbid ADHD
Non-completers (n = 2)9.59951t = 71t = 83n = 1 in both1 of 2
Completers (n = 8)9.58840t = 96t = 97Range 1-5, mean 26 of 8

1 Note. IQ: Intelligence quotient; CGAS: Children’s Global Assessment Scale; SRS: Social Responsiveness Scale; RCADS: The Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale

TABLE 5.

Questionnaire ratings at baseline and after treatment

Questionnaires, ratersBaseline ratings N=10After treatment N=8Statistics
Mean (SD) rangeMean (SD) ranget-value p-value
CGAS, clinician-rated42.4 (6.9) 32-5248.3 (3.8) 41-55-3.85< .01
SRS t-score, mother91.1 (12.6) 62-10985.9 (11.0) 64-1033.03.02
RCADS t-score, mother94.6 (11.0) 74-11873.2 (20.1) 50-1104.25< .01
RCADS t-score, father96.2 (16.3) 76-11575.6 (17.9) 53-1122.73.04
RCADS t-score, child67.0 (16.0) 38-8260.0 (12.7) 43-764.06.01
ILC total score, child16.6 (4.4) 9-2118.9 (3.6) 13-24-2.24.07
ILC PR score, child3.6 (1.5) 2-63.0 (1.7) 0-51.66.16
CALIS raw score, mother50.1 (6.0) 39-5941.8 (10.3) 20-532.16.07
CALIS raw score, father45.4 (6.7) 37-5537.6 (12.8) 20-591.65.16

1 Note. CGAS: Children’s Global Assessment Scale; SRS: Social Responsiveness Scale; RCADS: The Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale; ILC: Inventory of Life Quality in Children and Adolescents, ILC total score is the LQ0 – 28 and PR is the problem score; CALIS: Child Anxiety Life Interference Scale

Language: English
Page range: 30 - 40
Published online: Mar 25, 2021
Published in print: Jan 1, 2021
Published by: Center for Evidence-based Psychiatry
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Beate Oerbeck, Kristin Romvig Overgaard, Tony Attwood, Jon Fauskanger Bjaastad, published by Center for Evidence-based Psychiatry
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.