Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A comparison of the reactivity of monoclonal and polyclonal Rh reagents with red cells after prolonged storage Cover

A comparison of the reactivity of monoclonal and polyclonal Rh reagents with red cells after prolonged storage

Paid access
|Nov 2020

Abstract

Previous studies with stored red cells collected into EDTA anticoagulant had shown that commercial polyclonal anti-C, -c, and -E reagents gave acceptable reactions for 60 days, but polyclonal antie reagents reliably detected the e antigen only through 14 days. At that time it was noted that a monoclonal anti-e reacted 3+ to 4+ with red cells that no longer reacted, or reacted very weakly, with the polyclonal anti-e reagents. This observation led to a comparison study of the reactivity of monoclonal versus polyclonal Rh reagents with stored red cells. Monoclonal and polyclonal anti-C, -c, and -E reagents showed comparable reaction strengths, and gave acceptable reactions over the entire testing period. Polyclonal anti-e reagents, which are known to be of lower titer, again did not give reliable reactions with stored cells after 14 days. However, three different monoclonal anti-e reagents were able to detect the presence of the e antigen on stored cells for many weeks. This study showed that the monoclonal anti-e reagents tested are superior to polyclonal anti-e reagents for typing specimens that have been stored for more than 14 days. Immunohematology 1994;10:12.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/immunohematology-2019-812 | Journal eISSN: 1930-3955 | Journal ISSN: 0894-203X
Language: English
Page range: 12 - 15
Published on: Nov 22, 2020
Published by: American National Red Cross
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 C.M. Westhoff, B.D. Sipherd, L.D. Toalson, published by American National Red Cross
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.