Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Lutheran blood group system: a review Cover

The Lutheran blood group system: a review

By: M.L. Beck  
Paid access
|Nov 2020

References

  1. Callender S, Race R, Paykoc ZV. Hypersensitivity to transfused blood. Br Med J 1945;2:83.10.1136/bmj.2.4411.83
  2. Callender ST, Race RR.A serological and geneticalstudy of multiple antibodies formed in response to blood transfusion by a patient with lupus erythematosus diffusus. Ann Eugen 1946;13:102–17.10.1111/j.1469-1809.1946.tb02346.x
  3. Mainwaring UR, Pickles MM.A further case of antiLutheran immunization with some studies on its capacity for human sensitization. J Clin Pathol 1948;1:292–4.10.1136/jcp.1.5.292
  4. Shaw S, Mourant AE, Iken EW. Hypersplenism with anti-Lutheran antibody following transfusion. Lancet 1954;2:170–1.10.1016/S0140-6736(54)90141-5
  5. Gozenbach R, Haasig A, Rosin S. Über posttransfu- sionelle bildung von anti-Lutheran antikorpern. Die haufigkeit des Lutheran-antigens Lua in der berolkerung nord-west und mitteleuropas. Blut 1955;272–4.10.1007/BF01630414
  6. Greenwalt TJ, Saski T.The Lutheran blood groups: a second example of anti-Lub and three further examples of anti-Lua. Blood 1957;12:998–1003.10.1182/blood.V12.11.998.998
  7. Francis BJ, Hatcher DE. Hemolytic disease of the newborn apparently caused by anti-Lua.Transfusion 1961;1:248–50.10.1111/j.1537-2995.1961.tb00050.x13701232
  8. Cutbush M, Chanarin I.The expected blood group antibody, anti-Lub. Nature 1956;178:855–6.10.1038/178855b013369558
  9. Shaw MA, Leak MR, Daniels GL, Green CA,Tippett P. The rare Lutheran blood group phenotype Lu(a–b–): a genetic study.Ann Hum Genet 1984;48:229–37.10.1111/j.1469-1809.1984.tb01019.x6465841
  10. Rowe GP, Gale SA, Daniels GL, Green CA,Tippett P.A study on Lu-null families in South Wales. Ann Hum Genet 1992;56:267–72.10.1111/j.1469-1809.1992.tb01151.x1449238
  11. Mourant AE,Kopec AC,Domaniewska-Sobczak K.The distribution of human blood groups and other polymorphisms. 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press, 1976.
  12. Yung CH, Chow MP,Hy HY, Mou LL, Lyou JY, Lee TD. Blood group phenotypes in Taiwan. Transfusion 1989;29:233–5.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1989.29389162730.x2922792
  13. Issitt PD, Anstee DJ. Applied blood group serology. 4th ed. Durham, NC: Montgomery Scientific Publications, 1998.
  14. Mohr J.A search for linkage between the Lutheran blood group and other hereditary characters. Acta Path Microbiol Scand 1951;28:207–10.10.1111/j.1699-0463.1951.tb03688.x14829286
  15. Mohr J. Estimation of linkage between the Lutheran and the Lewis blood groups. Acta Path Microbiol Scand 1951;29:339–42.10.1111/j.1699-0463.1951.tb00136.x14933035
  16. Mohr J. A study of linkage in man. Munksgard, Copenhagen. 1954.
  17. Williams AF, Barclay AN.The immunoglobulin superfamily—domains for cell surface recognition. Ann Rev Immunol 1988;6:381–405.10.1146/annurev.iy.06.040188.0021213289571
  18. Crawford MN, Greenwalt TJ, Sasaki T, Tippett PA, Sanger R, Race RR.The phenotype Lu(a–b–) together with unconventional Kidd groups in one family. Transfusion 1961;1:228–32.10.1111/j.1537-2995.1961.tb00047.x
  19. Tippett P.A case of suppressed Lua and Lub antigens. Vox Sang 1971;20:378–80.
  20. Taliano V, Guevin R-M, Tippett P.The genetics of a dominant inhibitor of the Lutheran antigens. Vox Sang 1973;24:42–7.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1973.tb03855.x4682512
  21. Stanbury A, Francis B.The Lu(a–b–) phenotype: an additional example.Vox Sang 1967;13:441–3.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1967.tb03788.x6069259
  22. Darnborough J, Firth R, Giles M, Goldsmith KLG, Crawford MN.A “new” antibody anti-LuaLub and two further examples of the genotype Lu(a–b–). Nature 1963;198:796.10.1038/198796a014025138
  23. Brown F, Simpson S,Cornwall S, Moore BPL, Oyen R, Marsh WL.The recessive Lu(a–b–) phenotype.A family study.Vox Sang 1974;26:259–64.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1974.tb02694.x4836779
  24. Myhre B,Thompson M,Anson C, Fishkin B,Carter PK. A further example of the recessive Lu(a–b–) pheno- type.Vox Sang 1975;29:66–8.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1975.tb00478.x1146276
  25. Daniels G. Human blood groups. Oxford, England: Blackwell Science, 1995.
  26. Norman PC,Tippett P, Beal RW.An Lu(a–b–) phenotype caused by an X-linked recessive gene.Vox Sang 1986;51:49–52.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1986.tb00208.x3739323
  27. Winkler MM, Hamilton JR. Previously tested donors eliminated to determine rare phenotype frequencies (abstract). Joint Congr Int Soc Blood Transfus and AABB, 1990:158.
  28. Udden MM, Umeda M, Hirano Y, Marcus DM. New abnormalities in the morphology,cell surface receptors, and electrolyte metabolism of In(Lu) erythrocytes. Blood 1987;69:52–7.10.1182/blood.V69.1.52.52
  29. Bove JR, Allen FH, Chiewsilp P, Marsh WL, Cleghorn TW.Anti-Lu4: a new antibody related to the Lutheran blood group system.Vox Sang 1971;21:302–10.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1971.tb04785.x5118510
  30. Marsh WL.Anti-Lu5, anti-Lu6 and anti-Lu7.Three antibodies defining high frequency antigens related to the Lutheran blood group system. Transfusion 1972;12:27–34.10.1111/j.1537-2995.1972.tb00018.x
  31. McIlroy M, McCreary J, Stroup M. Anti-Lu8, an antibody recognizing another Lutheran-related antigen. Vox Sang 1972;23:455–7.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1972.tb03835.x5077743
  32. Molthan L, Crawford MN, Marsh WL, Allen FH. Lu9, another new antigen of the Lutheran blood group system.Vox Sang 1973;24:468–71.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1973.tb03487.x4691240
  33. [33]Gralnick MA, Goldfinger D, Hatfield PA, Reid ME, Marsh WL. Anti-Lu11: another antibody defining a high-frequency antigen related to the Lutheran blood group system.Vox Sang 1974;27:52–6.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1974.tb02388.x4850590
  34. Sinclair M, Buchanan DI,Tippett P, Sanger R.Another antibody related to the Lutheran blood group system (Much).Vox Sang 1973;25:156–61.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1973.tb04823.x4724954
  35. Daniels G, Khalid G. Identification by immunoblotting, of the structures carrying Lutheran and paraLutheran blood group antigens. Vox Sang 1989; 57:137–41.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1989.tb01151.x2781741
  36. Shirey RS, Oyen R, Heeb KN, Kickler TS, Ness PM. 15Cr radiolabeled survival studies in a patient with anti-Lu12 (abstract). Transfusion 1988;28(Suppl): 375.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1988.28188127959.x3341072
  37. Marsh Wl, Johnson CL, Mueller KA, Mannessier L, Rouger P. First example of the Wj-negative phenotype (abstract).Transfusion 1983;23:423.
  38. Judd WJ, Marsh WL, Oyen R, et al. Anti-Lu14: a Lutheran antibody defining the product of an allele at the Lu8 blood group locus.Vox Sang 1977;32:214–9.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1977.tb00632.x857422
  39. Marsh WL, Oyen R, Rosso M, Gruber D, Cooper J.A second example of anti-Lu14. Transfusion 1976; 16:633–5.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1976.16677060247.x996923
  40. Sabo B, Pancoska C, Myers M,Thoreson S, McCreary J, Stroup M. Antibodies against two high frequency antigens of the Lutheran System. Lu:2 and Lu:16, made by Lu(a+b–) black females (abstract). Transfusion 1980;20:630.
  41. Turner C. Anti-Lu17 (anti-Pataracchia). A new antibody to a high frequency antigen in the Lutheran system. Canad J Med Tech. 1979;41:43–7.
  42. Salmon C, Salmon D, Liberge G, André R, Tippett P, Sanger R.Un nouvel antigène de groupe sanguin éry- thocytaire presént chez 80% des sujets de race blanche. Nouv Rev Franc Hémat 1961;1:649–61.
  43. Frandson S, Atkins CJ, Moulds M, Poole J, Crawford MN, Tippett P. Anti-Aub: the antithetical antibody to anti-Aua.Vox Sang 1989;56:54–6.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1989.tb03049.x2644738
  44. Daniels GL, LePence PY, Rouger P, Salmon C,Tippett P.The red cell antigens Aua and Aub belong to the Lutheran system.Vox Sang 1991;60:191–2.
  45. Zelinski T, Kaita H, Coghlan G, Philipps S.Assignment of the Auberger red cell antigen polymorphism to the Lutheran blood group system: genetic justifica- tion.Vox Sang 1991;61:275–6.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1991.tb00959.x1776245
  46. Levene C, Gekker K, Poole J, Goldfarb A, DeCosta Y, Manny N. Lu20, a new high incidence ‘para’-Lu antigen in the Lutheran blood group system (abstract). Rev Paulista Med 1992;110:111–3.
  47. Crawford MN. In: Pierce SR, Macpherson CR, eds. Blood group systems: Duffy, Kidd and Lutheran. Arlington,VA:American Association of Blood Banks, 1988.
  48. Mollison PL, Engelfriet CP, Contreras M. Blood transfusion in clinical medicine. 9th ed. Oxford, England: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1987.
  49. Hardman JT, Beck ML. Hemagglutination in capillar- ies:correlation with blood group specificity and IgG subclass.Transfusion 1981;21:343–6.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1981.21381201810.x7233518
  50. Molthan L, Crawford MN.Three examples of anti-Lub and related data.Transfusion 1966;6:584–9.10.1111/j.1537-2995.1966.tb04782.x5951618
  51. Castillo L, Leveque C. Delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction due to anti-Lua (abstract). Joint Congr Int Soc Blood Transfus and AABB, 1990:162.
  52. Parsons SF, Mallinson G, Judson PA,Anstee DJ,Tanner MJA, Daniels GL. Evidence that the Lub blood group antigen is located on red cell membrane glycoproteins of 85 and 78 kD.Transfusion 1987;27:61–3.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1987.27187121477.x3810828
  53. Poole J. Review: the Lutheran blood group system— 1991. Immunohematology 1992; 8:1–8.10.21307/immunohematology-2019-973
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/immunohematology-2019-671 | Journal eISSN: 1930-3955 | Journal ISSN: 0894-203X
Language: English
Page range: 94 - 100
Published on: Nov 3, 2020
Published by: American National Red Cross
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 M.L. Beck, published by American National Red Cross
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.