Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Selecting an acceptable and safe antibody detection test can present a dilemma Cover

Selecting an acceptable and safe antibody detection test can present a dilemma

By: M. R. Combs and  S. J. Bredehoeft  
Paid access
|Oct 2020

References

  1. 1.Judd WJ. Modern approaches to pretransfusion testing. Immunohematology 1999;15:41–52. 2.Löw B, Messeter L. Antiglobulin test in low-ionic-strength salt solution for rapid antibody screening and cross-matching. Vox Sang 1974;26:53–61.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1974.tb02666.x4420622
  2. Nance SJ, Garratty G. Polyethylene glycol. A new potentiator of red blood cell antigen-antibody reactions. Am J Clin Pathol 1987;87:633–5.10.1093/ajcp/87.5.6333578138
  3. Wenz B, Apuzzo J, Shah DP. Evaluation of the polyethylene glycol-potentiated indirect antiglobulin test. Transfusion 1990; 30:318–21.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1990.30490273439.x2112277
  4. deMan AJ, Overbeeke MA. Evaluation of the polyethylene glycol antiglobulin test for detection of red blood cell antibodies. Vox Sang 1990; 58: 207–10.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1990.tb02092.x2339531
  5. Slater JL, Griswold DJ, Wojtyniak LS, Reisling MJ. Evaluation of the polyethylene glycol-indirect antiglobulin test for routine compatibility testing. Transfusion 1989; 29:686–8.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1989.29890020440.x2799893
  6. Shirey RS, Boyd JS, Ness PM. Polyethylene glycol versus low-ionic-strength solution in pretransfusion testing: a blinded comparison study. Transfusion 1994;34:368–70.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1994.34594249044.x8191557
  7. Lapierre Y, Rigal D, Adam J, et al. The gel test: a new way to detect red cell antigen-antibody reactions. Transfusion 1990;30:109–13.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1990.30290162894.x2305438
  8. Issitt PD, Combs MR, Booth K. Comparison of the MTS-gel and polyethylene glycol (PEG) IAT methods (abstract).Transfusion 1997;37:64S.
  9. Plapp FV, Sinor LT, Rachel JM, et al. A solid phase antibody screen. Am J Clin Pathol 1984;82:719–21.10.1093/ajcp/82.6.7196507384
  10. Issitt PD, Combs MR, Bradshaw T. Comparison of a solid phase and polyethylene glycol (PEG) IAT method in a large transfusion service (abstract). Transfusion 1997;37:28S.
  11. Reilly B, DePalma H, Cosgrove P, Parsi M, Grima K. Comparison between routine tube test (LISS), PEG tube test, gel technology and solid-phase red cell adherence assays (abstract). Transfusion 1997; 37:64S.
  12. Issitt PD, Combs MR, Bredehoeft SJ, et al. Lack of clinical significance of “enzyme-only” red cell antibodies.Transfusion 1993;33:284–93.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1993.33493242634.x8480348
  13. Ness PM, Shirey RS, Thoman SK, Buck SA. The differentiation of delayed serologic and delayed serologic and delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions: incidence, long-term serologic findings, and clinical significance. Transfusion 1990; 30: 688–93.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1990.30891020325.x2219254
  14. Issitt PD. From kill to overkill: 100 years of (perhaps too much) progress. Immunohematology 2000; 16:18–25.10.21307/immunohematology-2019-574
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/immunohematology-2019-553 | Journal eISSN: 1930-3955 | Journal ISSN: 0894-203X
Language: English
Page range: 86 - 89
Published on: Oct 14, 2020
Published by: American National Red Cross
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 M. R. Combs, S. J. Bredehoeft, published by American National Red Cross
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.