Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Automation in the transfusion service Cover

Automation in the transfusion service

By: S.H. Butch  
Paid access
|Mar 2020

References

  1. George ML, Rowlands D, Price M, Macey J. The lean Six Sigma pocket tool book. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005.
  2. Butch SH, Stoe MJ, Bensette MM, Downs T. Process flow changes for operation of a bidirectional interface for ABO/Rh typing and antibody screening (abstract). Transfusion 2006;46(Suppl): 214A.
  3. Butch SH, Stoe MJ. Implementing automation without an interface (abstract). AABB Annual Meeting. October 24–26, 2004. Transfusion 2004; 44(Suppl):174AS.
  4. Cheng G, Chan A, Chun M, Wong L. Evaluation of the gel test for antibody screening in a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong; insensitivity for some cold antibodies that are reactive at 37 degrees C by conventional indirect antiglobulin tests. Clin Lab Haematol 1995:81-4.10.1111/j.1365-2257.1995.tb00323.x7621635
  5. Daniel-Johnson JA, Rumsey DH. Increased frequency of warm autoantibodies of undetermined specificity in gel techniques compared to tube testing (abstract). Transfusion 2006;46 (Suppl):217.
  6. Dwyre DM, Erickson Y, Heintz M, Elbert C, Strauss RG. Comparative sensitivity of solid phase versus PEG enhancement assays for detection and identification of RBC antibodies. Transfus Apher Sci 2006;35:19-23.10.1016/j.transci.2006.02.00216905362
  7. Weisbach V, Kohnhauser T, Zimmermann R, Ringwald J, Strasser E, Zingsem J, Eckstein R. Comparison of the performance of microtube column systems and solid-phase systems and the tube low-ionic-strength solution additive indirect antiglobulin test in the detection of red cell alloantibodies. Transfus Med 2006;16:276-84.10.1111/j.1365-3148.2006.00674.x16879156
  8. Bunker ML, Thomas CL, Geyer SJ. Optimizing pretransfusion antibody detection and identification: a parallel, blinded comparison of tube PEG, solid-phase, and automated methods. Transfusion 2001;41:621-6.10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41050621.x11346697
  9. Onda AE, Viernes AL. Analysis of the introduction of automation to the TAT in a large metropolitan hospital blood center (abstract). Transfusion 2007;47(Suppl):265A.
  10. Butch SH, Stoe MJ. Decreasing turn-around times for specimen processing using the ProVue™ (abstract). Transfusion 2004;44(Suppl):178A.
  11. 42 CFR 493.1256 (d) (5) Subpart K Quality System for Nonwaived Testing Standard: Control procedures.
  12. CLSI EP12-A2 User Protocol for Evaluation of Qualitative Test Performance; Approved Guideline–Second Edition, 2008.
  13. CLSI EP15-A2 User Verification of Performance for Precision and Trueness; Approved Guideline– Second Edition, 2006.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/immunohematology-2019-278 | Journal eISSN: 1930-3955 | Journal ISSN: 0894-203X
Language: English
Page range: 86 - 92
Published on: Mar 24, 2020
Published by: American National Red Cross
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 S.H. Butch, published by American National Red Cross
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.