Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparison of gel test and conventional tube test for antibody detection and titration in D-negative pregnant women: study from a tertiary-care hospital in North India
Landsteiner K, Wiener AS. An agglutinable factor in human blood recognized by immune sera for rhesus blood. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1940;43:223–224.10.3181/00379727-43-11151
Lapierre Y, Rigal D, Adam J, et al. The gel test: a new way to detect red cell antigen-antibody reactions. Transfusion 1990;30:109–13.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1990.30290162894.x
Liley AW. Liquor amnil analysis in the management of the pregnancy complicated by rhesus sensitization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1961;82:1359–70.10.1016/S0002-9378(16)36265-2
Judd WJ, Steiner EA, Knafl PC. The gel test: sensitivity and specificity for unexpected antibodies to blood group antigens. Immunohematology 1997;13:132–5.10.21307/immunohematology-2019-728
Delaflor-Weiss E, Chizhevsky V. Implementation of gel testing for antibody screening and identification in a community hospital, 3-year experience. Lab Med 2005;36:489–92.10.1309/JAP6EC69BAAUG9B3
Lange J, Selleng K, Heddle NM, Traore A, Greinacher A. Coombs’ crossmatch after negative antibody screening—a retrospective observational study comparing the tube test and the microcolumn technology. Vox Sang 2010;98:e269–75.10.1111/j.1423-0410.2009.01278.x20635477
Novaretti MC, Jens E, Pagliarini T, Bonifácio SL, Dorlhiac-Llacer PE, Chamone DA. Comparison of conventional tube test with DiaMed gel microcolumn assay for anti-D titration. Clin Lab Haematol 2003;25: 311–15.10.1046/j.1365-2257.2003.00540.x12974722
Judd WJ; Scientific Section Coordinating Committee of the AABB. Practice guidelines for prenatal and perinatal immunohematology, revisited. Transfusion 2001;41;1445–52.10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41111445.x11724993