Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparison of gel test and conventional tube test for antibody detection and titration in D-negative pregnant women: study from a tertiary-care hospital in North India Cover

Comparison of gel test and conventional tube test for antibody detection and titration in D-negative pregnant women: study from a tertiary-care hospital in North India

Paid access
|Mar 2020

References

  1. Bowman J. Thirty-five years of Rh prophylaxis. Transfusion 2003;43:1661–6.10.1111/j.0041-1132.2003.00632.x
  2. Landsteiner K, Wiener AS. An agglutinable factor in human blood recognized by immune sera for rhesus blood. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1940;43:223–224.10.3181/00379727-43-11151
  3. Lapierre Y, Rigal D, Adam J, et al. The gel test: a new way to detect red cell antigen-antibody reactions. Transfusion 1990;30:109–13.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1990.30290162894.x
  4. Brecher ME. Antibody detection, identification, and compatibility testing. In: Roback JD, Combs MR, Grossman BJ, Hillyer CD, eds. Technical manual. 16th ed. Maryland: American Association of Blood Banks, 2008: 899-917.
  5. Liley AW. Liquor amnil analysis in the management of the pregnancy complicated by rhesus sensitization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1961;82:1359–70.10.1016/S0002-9378(16)36265-2
  6. Judd WJ, Steiner EA, Knafl PC. The gel test: sensitivity and specificity for unexpected antibodies to blood group antigens. Immunohematology 1997;13:132–5.10.21307/immunohematology-2019-728
  7. Delaflor-Weiss E, Chizhevsky V. Implementation of gel testing for antibody screening and identification in a community hospital, 3-year experience. Lab Med 2005;36:489–92.10.1309/JAP6EC69BAAUG9B3
  8. Lange J, Selleng K, Heddle NM, Traore A, Greinacher A. Coombs’ crossmatch after negative antibody screening—a retrospective observational study comparing the tube test and the microcolumn technology. Vox Sang 2010;98:e269–75.10.1111/j.1423-0410.2009.01278.x20635477
  9. Novaretti MC, Jens E, Pagliarini T, Bonifácio SL, Dorlhiac-Llacer PE, Chamone DA. Comparison of conventional tube test with DiaMed gel microcolumn assay for anti-D titration. Clin Lab Haematol 2003;25: 311–15.10.1046/j.1365-2257.2003.00540.x12974722
  10. Judd WJ; Scientific Section Coordinating Committee of the AABB. Practice guidelines for prenatal and perinatal immunohematology, revisited. Transfusion 2001;41;1445–52.10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41111445.x11724993
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/immunohematology-2019-216 | Journal eISSN: 1930-3955 | Journal ISSN: 0894-203X
Language: English
Page range: 174 - 177
Published on: Mar 14, 2020
Published by: American National Red Cross
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2020 M.K. Thakur, N. Marwaha, P. Kumar, S.C. Saha, B. Thakral, R.R. Sharma, K. Saluja, H.K. Dhawan, A. Jain, published by American National Red Cross
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.