Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Performance of an automated solid-phase red cell adherence system compared with that of a manual gel microcolumn assay for the identification of antibodies eluted from red blood cells Cover

Performance of an automated solid-phase red cell adherence system compared with that of a manual gel microcolumn assay for the identification of antibodies eluted from red blood cells

Paid access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. Shulman IA, Maffei LM, Downes KA. North American pretransfusion testing practices, 2001–2004: results from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program survey data, 2001–2004. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2005;129:984–9.10.5858/2005-129-984-NAPTPR16048410
  2. Weisbach V, Kohnhäuser T, Zimmermann R, et al. Comparison of the performance of microtube column systems and solid-phase systems and the tube low-ionic-strength solution additive indirect antiglobulin test in the detection of red cell alloantibodies. Transfus Med 2006;16:276–84.10.1111/j.1365-3148.2006.00674.x16879156
  3. Yamada C, Serrano-Rahman L, Vasovic LV, Mohandas K, Uehlinger J. Antibody identification using both automated solid-phase red cell adherence assay and a tube polyethylene glycol antiglobulin method. Transfusion 2008;48:1693–8.10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01736.x18482178
  4. Carter JE, Gallego M, Stubbs JR. The identification of red cell antibodies: a comparative study of a solid phase red cell adherence system, a gel system, and agglutination testing (abstract). Am J Clin Pathol 1997;107:486–7.
  5. Reilly B, DePalma H, Cosgrove P, Parsi M, Grima K. Comparison study between routine tube test (LISS), PEG tube test, gel technology, and solid phase red cell adherence assays (abstract). Transfusion 1997;37(Suppl):64S.
  6. Casina TS. In search of the Holy Grail: comparison of antibody screening methods. Immunohematology 2006;22: 196–202.10.21307/immunohematology-2019-380
  7. Steiner EA, Casina TS, Mann NN, Judd WJ. Comparison of acid eluates tested in gel vs. tube (abstract). Transfusion 1998;38(Suppl):37S.
  8. Greco VA, Byrne KM, Procter JL, Stroncek DF. Detection of antibodies in acid eluates with the gel microcolumn assay. Transfusion 2002;42:698–701.10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00108.x12147021
  9. Beck KH, Kaup N, Ilse R, Beeser H. [Capture-R Ready-ID and DiaMed-ID for identification of erythrocyte bound antibodies after acid elution.] Beitr Infusionsther Transfusionsmed 1997;34:171–5. [Article in German]
  10. Anti-Human Globulin, manufacturer’s insert. Norcross, GA: Immucor, 2007.
  11. Gamma Elu-Kit II™, manufacturer’s insert. Norcross, GA: Immucor, 2007.
  12. ID-Micro Typing System, Gel Test, manufacturer’s insert. Pompano Beach, FL: Micro Typing Systems, Inc, an Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics Company, 2008.
  13. Capture-R Ready ID, manufacturer’s insert. Norcross, GA: Immucor, 2006.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/immunohematology-2019-167 | Journal eISSN: 1930-3955 | Journal ISSN: 0894-203X
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 5
Published on: Dec 1, 2019
Published by: American National Red Cross
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 R.H. Finck, R.J. Davis, S. Teng, D. Goldfinger, A.F. Ziman, Q. Lu, S. Yuan, published by American National Red Cross
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.