Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Single-center comparison of gel microcolumn and solid-phase methods for antibody screening Cover

Single-center comparison of gel microcolumn and solid-phase methods for antibody screening

Paid access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. Pineda AA, Vamvakas EC, Gorden LD, Winters JL, Moore SB. Trends in the incidence of delayed hemolytic and delayed serologic transfusion reactions. Transfusion 1999;39: 1097–103.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1999.39101097.x10532604
  2. Weisbach V, Ziener A, Zimmermann R, Glaser A, Zingsem J, Eckstein R. Comparison of the performance of four microtube column agglutination systems in the detection of red cell alloantibodies. Transfusion 1999;39:1045–50.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1999.39101045.x10532596
  3. Bunker ML, Thomas CL, Geyer SJ. Optimizing pretransfusion antibody detection and identification: a parallel, blinded comparison of tube PEG, solid-phase, and automated methods. Transfusion 2001;41:621–6.10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41050621.x11346697
  4. Yamada C, Serrano-Rahman L, Vasovic LV, Mohandas K, Uehlinger J. Antibody identification using both automated solid-phase red cell adherence assay and a tube polyethylene glycol antiglobulin method. Transfusion 2008;48:1693–8.10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01736.x18482178
  5. Winters JL, Richa EM, Bryant SC, Tauscher CD, Bendix BJ, Stubbs JR. Polyethylene glycol antiglobulin tube versus gel microcolumn: influence on the incidence of delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions and delayed serologic transfusion reactions. Transfusion 2010;50:1444–52.10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02609.x20230534
  6. Roback JD, Grossman BJ, Harris T, Hillyer CD. Technical manual. 17th ed. Washington, DC: AABB, 2011:450.
  7. Harmening DM. Modern blood banking and transfusion practices. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis, 2005.
  8. Capture-R Ready-Screen (I and II) [package insert]. Norcross, GA: Immucor, Inc.; 2010.
  9. Casina TS. In search of the Holy Grail: comparison of antibody screening methods. Immunohematology 2006;22:196–202.10.21307/immunohematology-2019-380
  10. Weisbach V, Kohnhäuser T, Zimmermann R, et al. Comparison of the performance of microtube column systems and solid-phase systems and the tube low-ionic-strength solution additive indirect antiglobulin test in the detection of red cell alloantibodies. Transfus Med 2006;16:276–84.10.1111/j.1365-3148.2006.00674.x16879156
  11. Garozzo G, Licitra V, Criscione R, et al. A comparison of two automated methods for the detection and identification of red blood cell alloantibodies. Blood Transfus 2007;5:33–40.
  12. Haywood JR, Moulds MKG, Bryant BJ. Determination of optimal method for antibody identification in a reference laboratory. Immunohematology 2011;27:146–50.10.21307/immunohematology-2019-189
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/immunohematology-2019-131 | Journal eISSN: 1930-3955 | Journal ISSN: 0894-203X
Language: English
Page range: 101 - 104
Published on: Dec 1, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 A.M. Schmidt, B.J. Bendix, E.K. Jacob, S.C. Bryant, J.R. Stubbs, published by American National Red Cross
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.