References
- Rumsey DH, Ciesielski DJ. New protocols in serologic testing: a review of techniques to meet today’s challenges. Immunohematology 2000;16:131–7.
- Roback JD, Grossman BJ, Harris T, Hillyer CD. Technical manual. 17th ed. Bethesda, MD: American Association of Blood Banks, 2011.
- Jørgensen J, Nielsen M, Nielsen CB, Nørmark J. The influence of ionic strength, albumin and incubation time on the sensitivity of the indirect Coombs’ test. Vox Sang 1979;36:186–91.
- Skaik YA. Detection of Rh antibodies using two low ionic diluents: extension of the incubation time and the number of Rh antibodies detected. J Postgrad Med 2008;54:4–6.
- Reznicek MJ, Cordle DG, Strauss RG. A hemolytic reaction implicating Sda antibody missed by immediate spin crossmatch. Vox Sang 1992;62:173–5.
- Judd WJ, Steiner EA, Abruzzo LV, et al. Anti-i causing acute hemolysis following a negative immediate-spin crossmatch. Transfusion 1992;32:572–5.
- Wise SC, Larson PJ, Cook LO. Antibodies to low-incidence antigens and elimination of the antihuman globulin phase of the crossmatch-case report: anti-Wra. Immunohematology 1997;13:20–2.
- Koshy R, Patel B, Harrison JS. Anti-Kpa-induced severe delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction. Immunohematology 2009;25:44–7.
- Higgins JM, Sloan SR. Stochastic modeling of human RBC alloimmunization: evidence for a distinct population of immunologic responders. Blood 2008;112:2546–53.
- Judd WJ, Fullen DR, Steiner EA, Davenport RD, Knafl PC. Revisiting the issue: can the reading for serologic reactivity following 37 degrees C incubation be omitted? Transfusion 1999;39:295–9.
- Chapman JF, Milkins C, Voak D. The computer crossmatch: a safe alternative to the serological crossmatch. Transfus Med 2000;10:251–6.