Figure 1:
Figure 2:
Figure 3:
Figure 4:
Figure 5:
Figure 6:
Figure 7:
Figure 8:
Figure 9:
Figure 10:
Figure 11:
Figure 12:
Figure 13:
Figure 14:
Figure 15:
Figure 16:
Figure 17:
Figure 18:
Figure 19:
Figure 20:
Figure 21:
Figure 22:
Simulation parameters_
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Total simulation time | 12 min |
| Simulation area | 9000 m × 1000 m |
| Total no. of vehicles | 50 vehicles |
| Vehicles mobility | Random starting from 0 to 40 km/hr |
| Mobility model | Random waypoint model |
| Number of lanes | 2 |
| IEEE 802.11p data rate | 1 Mbps |
| Channel bandwidth | 2 Mbps |
| Packet size | 512 bytes |
| Transmission range per hop | 250 m |
| Node processing delay | sec |
Summarize comparison between different protocols_
| KPI | PBR-DV | VADD | GSPR | CMGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VANET delay | Very low | High | Low | Low |
| VANET Throughput | Very high | High | Very high | Low |
| VANET retransmission attempts | Very low | Very high | High | Low |
| VANET dropped data | Very low | Very High | Very high | Very low |
| VANET load | Very low | Very high | Very low | Very high |
| VANET traffic received | Very low | Very low | Very low | Very low |
Summarize comparison between proposed and AODV protocol_
| KPI | AODV | AODV + PBR-DV |
|---|---|---|
| VANET delay | Low | Very low |
| VANET throughput | Very high | Very high |
| VANET retransmission attempts | Low | Very low |
| VANET dropped data | Low | Low |
| VANET load | Very high | Very high |
| VANET traffic received | Very high | Very high |