Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Dog Distraction Quantified Cover

Dog Distraction Quantified

Vision Rehabilitation International
Volume 3 (2010): Issue 1 (January 2010)
By: Peter McKenzie  
Open Access
|Jan 2010

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

Percentage of dogs with dog distraction referrals by calendar year.
Percentage of dogs with dog distraction referrals by calendar year.

Figure 1.

Percentage of dogs with dog distraction referrals by calendar year.
Percentage of dogs with dog distraction referrals by calendar year.

Figure 2.

Number of dogs associated with aftercare issue (N = 280).
Number of dogs associated with aftercare issue (N = 280).

Figure 3.

Major aftercare issues associated with dogs placed in calendar years 2000 to 2003.
Major aftercare issues associated with dogs placed in calendar years 2000 to 2003.

Figure 4.

Major aftercare issues associated with dogs placed in calendar years 2004 to 2006.
Major aftercare issues associated with dogs placed in calendar years 2004 to 2006.

Figure 5.

Major aftercare issues associated with dogs placed in calendar years 2007 to 2008.
Major aftercare issues associated with dogs placed in calendar years 2007 to 2008.

Table 2.

Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by region.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by region.

Table 3.

Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by dog breed.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by dog breed.

Table 4.

Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by dog sex and user gender (Golden Retrievers excluded) n = 243.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by dog sex and user gender (Golden Retrievers excluded) n = 243.

Table 5.

Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by breeder quantity of dogs.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by breeder quantity of dogs.

Table 6.

Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by puppy raiser experience.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by puppy raiser experience.

Table 7.

Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by puppy raiser numbers.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by puppy raiser numbers.

Table 8.

Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by training intake assessment score.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by training intake assessment score.

Figure 6.

Percentage of dogs with dog distraction referrals by assessment score.
Percentage of dogs with dog distraction referrals by assessment score.

Table 9.

Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by puppy raising variable and assessment score.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by puppy raising variable and assessment score.

Table 10.

Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by supervising instructor.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by supervising instructor.

Table 11.

Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by batch type.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by batch type.

Table 12.

Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by training type.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by training type.

Table 13.

Percentage of dogs with dog distraction referrals by program instructor.
Percentage of dogs with dog distraction referrals by program instructor.

Table 14.

Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by user age.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by user age.

Table 15.

Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by user experience.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by user experience.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/ijom-2010-002 | Journal eISSN: 2652-3647
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 9 - 26
Published on: Jan 1, 2010
Published by: Guide Dogs NSW/ACT
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Clinical medicine,
Physical and rehabilitation medicine

© 2010 Peter McKenzie, published by Guide Dogs NSW/ACT
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 3 (2010): Issue 1 (January 2010)Next article